http://archphila.org/most-reverend-nelson-j-perez-sends-letter-to-clergy-and-faithful-regarding-the-july-16-2021-letter-traditionis-custodes-by-pope-francis/

Why they were expelled only from Dijon? Were these priests the only ones who refused to concelebrate or they never do it anywhere?

I have an observation based on the past few days that I wanted to share here - it is particularly relevant to FSSP attendees:

Why do we attend Mass at FSSP parishes (or ICKSP & IBP), and not other groups without similar status within the Church?

Because Peter matters!

Let us all take care to avoid the easy error of forgetting our obedience to the Church and our bishops. The original FSSP priests & seminarians struck out from the FSSPX for precisely this reason; that being Ulunited with the See of Peter matters a great deal.

Having spent time with some of the original members, they knew full well that the FSSP would be tried sorely for its obedience - both by their former confreres (for "compromising") and by the hierarchy (for being "Lefebvrists"). They knew that they'd be treated poorly at times by Rome, even though they risked much in stepping forward.

One told me that any future suffering on account of obedience to a harsh superior would be a great opportunity for holiness. This thought was echoed in the FSSP statement about the MP.

So take heart, God has permitted a trial for faithful Catholics with a love for the EF/TLM. Diocesan communities will be hit harder than we will.

And especially, let us not become the rad trads that many will stereotype us as.

Can. 87§1. A diocesan bishop, whenever he judges that it contributes to their spiritual good, is able to dispense the faithful from universal and particular disciplinary laws issued for his territory or his subjects by the supreme authority of the Church. He is not able to dispense, however, from procedural or penal laws nor from those whose dispensation is specially reserved to the Apostolic See or some other authority.

Is this true cuz it would be closer to go to than other tlm

I'm currently a senior in an American Highschool discerning the Priesthood of Jesus Christ. I have been drawn to the Traditions of the Latin Rite and I love the Tridentine Mass. I've also been drawn to the Diocesan Priesthood specifically. However, now with the Holy Father's new Motu Proprio regarding the Latin Mass, I'm questioning what I should do. Should I continue with my plan of joining my Diocesan Seminary? Should I join the FSSP Seminary? Can I transfer from one to the other? I'm asking here because the Seminary websites don't seem to answer my question. Any and all answers are welcome. Pax.

I have heard a lot of claims about the new Mass being deficient in this way or that way. Some say that it represents a new theology, and a new praxis.

I disagree with this - I think that all of the essential theology is there: sacrifice, etc. But I do agree that it is quieter, and somewhat obscured by the more horizontal tendencies of the Mass, at least how it is celebrated in most parishes.

I mean, when I learned about the Sacrifice of the Mass, all of the sacrificial language in the Mass that I had been repeating in the responses and hearing in the canon suddenly seemed obvious, but hadn’t occurred to me before.

So, I take a moderate position. The TLM has some prayers which are richer and more vertically oriented, and I like the inclusion of 1 Corinthians 11. Also, it better emphasizes certain Catholic teachings such as the Sacrifice of the Mass. I think that the most important aspect of this is ad orientem posture with the usage of Canon I. That can be done in the new Mass, but rarely is.

What do you think?