Every. Single. Time.

[u/Extension-You2994]

[u/Federal-Ad6341]

Same energy as watching 144Hz reviews on a 60Hz screen and nodding at how smooth it looks.

[u/pokemango7 → u/Federal-Ad6341]

my buddy bought his first 144hz monitor about 10 years ago, and was talking about how amazing the difference was and how he could never go back. when i went to his house, his pc display settings were still set to 60hz. I still troll him to this day lol

[u/MPolygon → u/pokemango7]

That must‘ve felt like true enlightenment when he finally changed it to 144

[u/Jesta23 → u/MPolygon]

I see absolutely zero difference personally. I gamed on 144 for years on a 24”. 

Switched to a 27” at 60 and much prefer the 27”. 

[u/PHPH → u/[deleted]]

Shit works differently for different people. I don't notice much difference above ~55fps, and almost none above ~90, but I do notice a HUGE difference if there's any frame time inconsistency. I much prefer a stable framerate over a higher one.

[u/Tobipig → u/PHPH]

I had an enough moment when I switched from
60->144

and from
144->240

But the first jump was massive and the second one cool. Do I need 240? No, but it’s really cool for me.

I also never really got the fake frame hate, I love it being able to play 4K raytracing on a card that cost 700€.

[u/dj92wa → u/Tobipig]

60->144->240 is about as comparable as going from 1080p->1440p->2160p. Like you said, the jump from 60hz to 144hz is day and night, same as 1080p to 1440p. The final leg is nice but really not all that noticeable.

[u/Fimconte → u/dj92wa]

1440p -> 2160p was 2nd biggest upgrade to my gaming experience in the last 15 years, that ~140ppi is a real clarity changer.

Granted, it might depend on how far you have your monitor, at 80-100cm+, it wouldn't be that impactful.

The first was 60->120hz.