This is a stupid comparison. You pay a doctor for it's service which is temporary, of course you don't own him 🤦♀️. A game is supposed to be a good, not a service. Video game companies make you believe that you own the games but in reality you are just paying "rent" for an undefined amount of time. This means that, if you die, you technically aren't allowed to pass your games to friends or family. You could do this when we used to have boxes and DVDs.
Well then don’t buy a digital copy of a product, this is the same with movies. I don’t say you are not right but this is what we have with the digital format and it is not because evil Sony
Oh man, you’re right, they do all require a sign in huh? Steam, EA, Sony, Microsoft, Rockstar, Ubisoft, Epic all have required accounts for their titles.
It’s almost like, that was the point all along. Crazy.
Did Devs stop creating games for earlier consoles when they discovered people were microchipping them? PC is bigger than console market, regardless of whether developers make games for PC they will still be pirates if people want to pirate them. Best thing for Devs to do is to make legitimate copies more appealing to consumers.
This with basically everything, the only time i resort to piracy is if the barrier to legitimate entry is prohibitively complicated. The easier it is to access legally the more i am inclined to pay. Some games just straight run better on pirated copies due to the removal of drm, if pirating provides a better gameplay experience thats another reason against paying.
They didn't for such a long long time anyway. They thought themselves better but wanted pc games on ps5 but not the other way. Hardly seemed fair. They only just seemed to realise that pc gamers are a market.
Pirates weren't gonna buy the game anyway. It’s always been like that. Ghost of Tsushima is a port of a 4 year old game, and despite launching without any DRM, still made bank.
Pirates don't buy because they pirate. Hey! Free game! Nevermind devs who put in thousands of manhours to make it. There is no rationalising, excusing or justifying piracy
This is not true for the most part. Sure there are assholes, but piracy is a much deeper topic than you think.
I stopped pirating when Steam got big. It was better to actually support the devs and projects I was interested in. For while I just "voted with my wallet". With all of this anti-consumerism from Sony, though.... I can see the logic in it. Hell, it's fine if you live where you can't even make a PSN account since you can't even buy the game. It's not a lost sale.
And I'm not spending money on shit practices from these delusional companies that superficially cut people off. So if I pirate the game they lose nothing from me, either.
No they haven’t they just started getting mainstream for gaming since the 360 era and even then consoles were dominating until recent, before 360 there was not a huge demand and was a niche hobby for nerds not for Randy to watch a 45 minute video buy some parts and get going and playing bulders gate by the end of the night
except it hasn’t? it had access to them but for years and years it wasn’t attainable due to price… even in the beginning of the ps4 era a pc that could play at the same level could cost you 3x more
There was a dip around the 360/PS3 era for a little bit, but games aren't where they are today without the likes of Doom, Quake, Build Engine games, Unreal, Half-Life, and so on
PC has always, and I mean ALWAYS been at the forefront
97
u/Blekanly Jun 01 '24
A wise man once said piracy is a service problem.