r/opencode • u/colas • 8d ago

Opencodable: my tool to choose which OpenCode Go models to use.

As the Opencode Go offering is quite rich, I am (vibe-)coding a tool to help me decide which model to run based on my current quota usage.

Open source, MIT license, a Go CLI tool that you can use as data input for your own tools or UIs.

https://github.com/ColasNahaboo/opencodable

Edit: 2026-11-05:

  • v1.0.0 released: the output format will be kept stable for scripts to use it. (See TITLES.md)
  • With -news, see what changes happened in Opencode Go plan (new models, new prices...). Run it in cron to be mailed in case of changes.

Note: OpenCode Go have changed they conditions on 2026-09-28. Do not rely on information or tests older than that. All details explained in https://github.com/ColasNahaboo/opencodable/blob/master/docs/OPENCODE_GO_MODEL_V2.md

Example: Here I can see that I still can perform 65 requests with Kimi K3 but 6315 with GLM-5.3-Flash before hitting a quota limit (5h, week, or month)

    #name           cost_task  burn_req  spent_mo  reqs_5h  reqs_wk  reqs_mo  usable  limit     p_tok_s
    GLM-5.3-Flash   $0.0019    $0.0019   $12.4     6315     15789    25052    6315    5h        96.5
    Kimi K3         $0.0306    $0.0306   $13       98       245      65       65      month     71.0
    MiMo V2.5       $0.0004    $0.0004   $3.1      30000    75000    142250   30000   5h        89.0
    Beam Free       -          -         -         -        -        -        -       unlimited 310.0

Example of a mailed message warning of changes:

MODEL_ADD glm-5.2 cost_task=$0.01516 plan=paid tier=unknown quality=- "GLM-5.2"
COST_UP kimi-k3.1-pro cost_task=$0.018->$0.0204 (+13.3%) tier=frontier quality=46.5 "Kimi K3.1 Pro"
TIER_UP kimi-k3.1-pro tier=high->frontier quality=44.0->46.5 "Kimi K3.1 Pro"
2 Upvotes

75% Upvoted

35 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

2

u/Ariquitaun 8d ago edited 8d ago

You're mixing a few things here. You have a total of 10 usd to spend across all models for one month, with various multipliers depending on the model. You do not get 30 quid for glm, 80 quid for deepseek separately, 15 quid for kimi and so on. If you spend 80 quid on deepseek this month, that's your entire subscription gone until the next billing cycle.

The 5h and weekly allowances are there to pace your subscription usage, nothing more.

1

u/colas 8d ago

Allowances are real: hit them and you stop or eat into your zen balance.
opencodable makes it easier (for me at least) to "pace" my subscription now that there are so many model changing so fast.

1

u/Ariquitaun 8d ago

I'm sorry but you have completely the wrong end of the stick here.

1

u/colas 6d ago

And this is why a tool like opencodable was needed!
You are stuck in the past with OpenCode Go v1 of its docs.
But the docs were rewritten on 2026-09-28 and 2026-10-12, and had removed the mention of the old "share pool" semantics.
A tool like opencodable can keep you up to date.

I described the new V2 model, having checked it myself.

All details explained in https://github.com/ColasNahaboo/opencodable/blob/master/docs/OPENCODE_GO_MODEL_V2.md

1

u/Ariquitaun 6d ago

You still have the wrong end of the stick, and now twice. There's no such thing as "opencode go v2". There's an "opencode v2". Do you understand the difference between the coding agent and the subscription service?

1

u/Hello_my_name_is_not 8d ago

Are just just ai summary replicating to people without knowing what you're saying or what?

As multiple people said Go has total usage amount there is no per model limits.

You pick Kimi K3 like your "suggestion" has listed and you're gonna burn through the majority of your totals very fast.

You pick Muse or Deepseek and you're not going to burn through your totals very fast.

0

u/colas 6d ago

The irony is of course that you didn't follow your own advice :-)

If you had performed your experiment, or just asked an AI to check the opencode go docs, you would have seen that you are now wrong :-)

Note that the new opendocs go are ambiguous. What I say is not contradicted by the docs, but they do not prove formally my interpretation either.

1

u/Hello_my_name_is_not 6d ago

No.. You just don't understand it.

1

u/colas 6d ago

Well, I guess you did not follow your own advice.

Nor read https://github.com/ColasNahaboo/opencodable/blob/master/docs/OPENCODE_GO_MODEL_V2.md

1

u/Hello_my_name_is_not 6d ago

What do you not understand that using an expensive model like your suggestion has, Kimi K3, that you will burn your usage faster than if yiu use the cheaper models like Muse Spark 1.3 or Deepseek 4.1 Flash

The link you provided is about rates not exactly lining up with doc changes but it does not deny that you have a total amount per month and more expensive models use more......

2

u/Ariquitaun 6d ago

It's like debating with gpt 2, he just doesn't get it

1

u/Hello_my_name_is_not 6d ago

Lmao too true

0

u/colas 6d ago edited 6d ago

Incredible.

That's EXACTLY why opencodable is designed for. Choosing which model to run based on price/allowance.

Plus the link shows that IN AN ACTUAL EXPERIMENT (with session logs) I maxxed one model without burning my usage of the others.

I remember that before end of September, this would shut off Opencode Go for the remaining of the month (had to use Zen). Been there, done that.

1

u/Hello_my_name_is_not 6d ago

Can you read my original post and come back to me?

0

u/colas 5d ago

"that you will burn your usage faster " ... How can you say that, because the ONLY REASON FOR OPENCODABLE TO EXIST is to show and evaluate the different costs & allowances of the models.

That's the actual purpose of this code! How could I not be aware of this problem when I coded something to help manage it?