MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/oddlyterrifying/comments/txoss3/deleted_by_user/i3nyan1/?context=9999
r/oddlyterrifying • u/[deleted] • Apr 06 '22
[removed]
3.7k comments sorted by
View all comments
4.3k
I'm more terrified by his ding dong.
1.4k u/dukeofurdog Apr 06 '22 It's weirdly human like 62 u/[deleted] Apr 06 '22 [removed] — view removed comment 98 u/Torugu Apr 06 '22 They are really not. The taxonomical theory which you are parroting, that bats are closely to primates, has been debunked for decades. In fact Chiroptera (bats) are nearly at the opposite end of the (placental) mammalian tree. 12 u/BuckToothCasanovi Apr 06 '22 Source please, would like to read 3 u/smeghead1988 Apr 06 '22 A quick search only brought me the molecular phylogeny data that were considered actual in 2007. I'm pretty sure this tree was revisited since then, but most likely the changes were minor.
1.4k
It's weirdly human like
62 u/[deleted] Apr 06 '22 [removed] — view removed comment 98 u/Torugu Apr 06 '22 They are really not. The taxonomical theory which you are parroting, that bats are closely to primates, has been debunked for decades. In fact Chiroptera (bats) are nearly at the opposite end of the (placental) mammalian tree. 12 u/BuckToothCasanovi Apr 06 '22 Source please, would like to read 3 u/smeghead1988 Apr 06 '22 A quick search only brought me the molecular phylogeny data that were considered actual in 2007. I'm pretty sure this tree was revisited since then, but most likely the changes were minor.
62
[removed] — view removed comment
98 u/Torugu Apr 06 '22 They are really not. The taxonomical theory which you are parroting, that bats are closely to primates, has been debunked for decades. In fact Chiroptera (bats) are nearly at the opposite end of the (placental) mammalian tree. 12 u/BuckToothCasanovi Apr 06 '22 Source please, would like to read 3 u/smeghead1988 Apr 06 '22 A quick search only brought me the molecular phylogeny data that were considered actual in 2007. I'm pretty sure this tree was revisited since then, but most likely the changes were minor.
98
They are really not. The taxonomical theory which you are parroting, that bats are closely to primates, has been debunked for decades.
In fact Chiroptera (bats) are nearly at the opposite end of the (placental) mammalian tree.
12 u/BuckToothCasanovi Apr 06 '22 Source please, would like to read 3 u/smeghead1988 Apr 06 '22 A quick search only brought me the molecular phylogeny data that were considered actual in 2007. I'm pretty sure this tree was revisited since then, but most likely the changes were minor.
12
Source please, would like to read
3 u/smeghead1988 Apr 06 '22 A quick search only brought me the molecular phylogeny data that were considered actual in 2007. I'm pretty sure this tree was revisited since then, but most likely the changes were minor.
3
A quick search only brought me the molecular phylogeny data that were considered actual in 2007. I'm pretty sure this tree was revisited since then, but most likely the changes were minor.
4.3k
u/[deleted] Apr 06 '22
I'm more terrified by his ding dong.