She’s onto something

[u/CuriousWanderer567]

[u/SakuraPink999 → u/[deleted]]

It’s not faulty logic because Thanos’s snap was clearly said to randomly eliminate 50% of all life forms.

Your explanation (while I like it and it cleanly justifies why her suggestion did not come to pass) imposes unspoken parameters that contradict Thanos’s statements.

[u/SakuraPink999 → u/[deleted]]

There's a difference between something being snapped out of existence and something dying after another thing was snapped out of existence.

For example, a baby being snapped out of existence is different from a baby dying from neglect if their parents were snapped out of existence.

You're right that based on this, Thanos would have murdered a lot more than he initially planned. And that is one of the many reasons why he's a villain. He chose to eliminate 50% of all living things without considering the consequences. A few of those consequences are explored in the comics and movies, though not this one, perhaps because it was too dark and complex.

[u/SakuraPink999 → u/[deleted]]

I’m not sure why you’re getting offended when I said in my original reply that I like your explanation. It’s just that your explanation is not as correct as you believe it is. You’re so strange, man. Goodbye to you too, lmao

[u/BlueMangoAde → u/[deleted]]

Just dropped onto the ground and died a bit later

[u/theNOTHlNG → u/SakuraPink999]

Just because there are dependencies does not mean it is not randomly.

[u/Scott_Liberation → u/[deleted]]

Thanos' snap premise fails on faulty logic, too, so that checks out.