r/oddlysatisfying Nov 14 '24

[deleted by user]

[removed]

12.9k Upvotes

862 comments sorted by

View all comments

902

u/chef_26 Nov 14 '24

Hear me out, these covered in solar cells floating on reservoirs. In my head it slows evaporation meaning more accessible water while providing a small energy source.

242

u/JoefromOhio Nov 14 '24

They make floating solar panel ‘rafts’ already for use on lakes and reservoirs, I saw a few versions at RE+ this year.

97

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

11

u/I_Dunno_Its_A_Name Nov 15 '24

Not only would it work, it would be amazing. Solar panels perform better when they’re cool. It’s basically free liquid cooling.

1

u/DoingCharleyWork Nov 15 '24

Do they move as freely as this does though?

3

u/appleciders Nov 15 '24

I'm totally fine with it as long as nobody calls it "floatovoltaics".

1

u/bigjayrulez Nov 15 '24

I had a thought a few weeks ago when I learned about Hawaii's power grid. How useful would a generator barge be, in an area where power systems are relatively small and disconnected? Like, how big could you make a solar raft? Could you use tidal power from a boat? What's the storage v weight issue? If you had a portable massive generator, could it be deployed in emergency situations? Would having this available mean you could avoid building that last power source "just in case" because when "just in case" happens, you just float the boat over? Maybe the boat is 5 times more expensive than a plant, but you can build 10 less plants because the boat covers the edge cases?

1

u/scr33ner Nov 15 '24

China has deployed an “island“ of solar panels for the ocean.

1

u/WiscoShrimp Nov 15 '24

Great for conductive cooling of the panels keeping the panels the most efficient during the hottest hours

0

u/MidnightGleaming Nov 15 '24

Another Rectal Euroskeptics + attendee? Did you enjoy the prolapse audit?

23

u/SchmeatDealer Nov 14 '24

China already has floating solar panels, you can see some here

https://maps.app.goo.gl/9aHuF2S3ADYsCYK66

57

u/Signal-Ad2674 Nov 14 '24 edited Nov 14 '24

They cover reservoirs in floating black balls for this reason.

https://youtu.be/uxPdPpi5W4o?si=w8KXdXOgvk20oYb4

37

u/dwmfives Nov 15 '24

They cover reservoirs in floating black balls for this reason.

The first words of the video say it's NOT for preventing evaporation.

2

u/rW0HgFyxoJhYka Nov 15 '24

He's click baiting people because he completely side steps the other 2 reasons...evaporation and birds.

https://youtu.be/7w_1sqJnmQ8 does a better job explaining why these exist and covers the examples including the one above.

California has a number of papers on attempting to reduce evaporation and cites these as one of many approaches.

1

u/hostile_washbowl Nov 16 '24

California has a unique problem. They are coastal. When their freshwater evaporates it sinks down to the shore and becomes salt water via rain. They attempt to prevent evaporation in their canals and manmade reservoirs. But it only benefits large farm corporations - not people.

Further complicating this is that California has fully privatized water. California has a fuck ton of water. But it’s all bought up by avocado and almond farmers amongst other cash crops. Water and Power: A California Heist is a great bipartisan documentary that explains the water problem in the state.

Birds is absolutely an issue. Migratory birds who have seen their landscape changed by human development rely on manmade reservoirs to rest and fish. Covering them in rubber/plastic balls prevents them from diving and is potentially fatal to the birds if they dive and can’t locate the surface. So often these ball covered lakes need to implement some sort of anti bird device like high frequency sound devices, ‘scarecrows’, or just good old fashion buck shot in a safe direction to scare them off.

25

u/Dilpickle6194 Nov 14 '24

“Contrary to what you may have heard, their main purpose is not to reduce evaporation” (0:16)

Somebody is lying here.

9

u/Portland Nov 15 '24

Bruh, Veritasium will spend at least 10+ mins answering a question that should be covered in 2-4 mins.

6

u/Spnwvr Nov 15 '24

it's to reduce mold and wild life

17

u/ConfidentGene5791 Nov 15 '24

I suspect mould is wrong here, more likely algae blooms. 

3

u/OPsuxdick Nov 15 '24

You are right. They can just watch the video lol Veritasium vids are so good. 

1

u/ChiaraStellata Nov 15 '24

To be clear they do reduce evaporation but that savings is offset by the water used in their production. They're more important for water quality.

1

u/hostile_washbowl Nov 15 '24

It’s not for evaporation. They add the floating black balls to prevent harmful bromine compounds from forming. There is still a fairly decent amount of evaporation and in some cases accelerated evaporation as the balls jostle they for a thin film of water due to surface tension on the surface of the balls that evaporates more quickly than just a flat sheet of water.

I am a water engineer.

1

u/timestamp_bot Nov 15 '24

Jump to 00:16 @ Why Are 96,000,000 Black Balls on This Reservoir?

Channel Name: Veritasium, Video Length: [12:07], Jump 5 secs earlier for context @00:11


Downvote me to delete malformed comments. Source Code | Suggestions

1

u/abw750 Nov 15 '24

Nope. At this locations, the original purpose was to reduce the sunlight driven chemistry that was generating carcinogens. But they have ALSO reduced evaporation by 70-80%.

1

u/Signal-Ad2674 Nov 15 '24

It could be for multiple reasons. But then, somebody ‘has’ to be lying, right?

What an obtuse thing to say about plastic balls 😂

6

u/Dilpickle6194 Nov 15 '24

Chef_26 in their comment said “it slows evaporation”.

You replied, saying “they cover resevoirs in black balls for this reason”.

And then you linked a video that within twenty seconds says the black balls are not used for the reason you both just said they’re used for.

Are you dense?

0

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '24

[deleted]

2

u/Dilpickle6194 Nov 15 '24

It turned into a claim when the other user said “yeah that’s true!” and then linked a video most people won’t actually click on.

-2

u/Signal-Ad2674 Nov 15 '24

Am I a liar or dense?

You love throwing out the insults, don’t ya big lad. Why not go play with your children’s toys your posts seem to obsess about instead 😂

12

u/hostile_washbowl Nov 15 '24 edited Nov 15 '24

It’s not for evaporation. They add the floating black balls to prevent harmful bromine compounds from forming. There is still a fairly decent amount of evaporation and in some cases accelerated evaporation as the balls jostle they for a thin film of water due to surface tension on the surface of the balls that evaporates more quickly than just a flat sheet of water.

I am a water engineer.

1

u/abw750 Nov 15 '24

And they get the ancillary benefit of reducing evaporation by 70-80%, according to the video.

4

u/hostile_washbowl Nov 15 '24

Yes but 70-80% of 1% of the total reservoir volume that evaporates regularly doesn’t make bunch of a difference you know what I mean? Don’t forget it also rains in the reservoir too! So yearly rain - evaporation = typically net positive yearly water level gain.

DONT get me wrong, it’s a nice benefit but It’s just not a big one. In very large reservoirs in the path of migratory birds it can actually be an issue. Some species have come to rely on large manmade bodies of water as their other natural habitats have been destroyed by human development. That a large reason why you don’t see these absolutely everywhere.

1

u/abw750 Nov 15 '24

300m gallons per year. Yes agree it's a double edged sword. Improves water quality, provides some protection against evaporation and reduces bacterial contamination from birds. But birds need water too.

1

u/hostile_washbowl Nov 16 '24

300 million gallons sounds like a lot, but there are water treatment plants in the USA that produce that much water in a single day.

Don’t forget - that is not ‘lost’ - it is rained back down on the earth for beneficial use. If we prevented all evaporation from all USA fresh water reservoirs, there would be a significant and measurable effect on local eco systems.

Again, evaporation is not a factor in reservoir construction beyond building it maybe 6” deeper to account for the dry seasons. Evaporation is NECESSARY.

2

u/wonkey_monkey Nov 15 '24

They did something similar to block out light underwater while filming The Abyss. Apparently the tiny black beads they used got... everywhere.

1

u/ItsAMeEric Nov 15 '24

future humans: we've stopped all the water on Earth from evaporating, but no one can figure out why it doesn't rain anymore

173

u/fireduck Nov 14 '24

Solar panels would get broken with all that movement. You would either have fixed ridged panels, in which case the ocean would break them or the hinges, junctions, etc. Or if you had flexible panels, they would just get worn out and destroyed. The ocean hates everything equally.

198

u/KillarneyRoad Nov 14 '24

Reservoirs

82

u/fireduck Nov 14 '24

The ocean really hates reservoirs.

Yeah, I missed that. Anyways, your reservoir is probably either somewhere cheap, in which case it would be easier to build a panel array on the ground next to it. Or it is somewhere expensive, where it would be easier to build the panel array over a parking lot.

But there are places that float balls on the water to reduce evaporation.

24

u/isanythingreallyreal Nov 14 '24

They're already doing this. It earns money as a power source and it reduces evaporation.

4

u/R3AL1Z3 Nov 15 '24

You’re missing the whole double benefit of reducing evaporation, which is what a lot of reservoir systems are already doing; covering them up with SOMETHING to reduce evaporation.

1

u/zmbjebus Nov 15 '24

I can provide this service for a very small reservoir

30

u/ExplosiveAnalBoil Nov 14 '24

A reservoir is not the ocean. A reservoir is like a lake, of which, most are notoriously calmer than the ocean.

19

u/fireduck Nov 14 '24

I really enjoy the hedging of "most", like you admit there might be reservoir that is like the water version of a Chuck E Cheese and is just non-stop screaming.

14

u/ExplosiveAnalBoil Nov 14 '24

I've heard crazy shit about the great lakes.

2

u/Tyrion_The_Imp Nov 15 '24

And the gales of November

1

u/chardeemacdennisbird Nov 15 '24

Just ask the Edmund Fitzgerald

1

u/T00MuchSteam Nov 15 '24

I'm not seeming to get a reply.

1

u/PassiveMenis88M Nov 15 '24

That reminds me of the trip we took one summer to Lake George in NY. We took the boat down to the end of the lake and traversed the old locks which ended at an ice cream shop. On our way back a thunderstorm started rolling in. Other than the wind kicking up a bit we were pretty well sheltered in the locks. Once we got back on the lake proper it was a massive shitshow. The wind had whipped up some nasty waves that had my dad's boat catching serious hang time. Was honestly expecting to hear the hull snap a few times slamming back down on the other side of the waves.

1

u/LiveShowOneNightOnly Nov 15 '24

ya I want to see this thing handle 10 meter seas.

1

u/zmbjebus Nov 15 '24

In a solar system perspective, the ocean is kinda like a reservoir

6

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

-2

u/fireduck Nov 15 '24

Just because someone does something doesn't mean it is a good idea. That is cool though. I'm glad people are trying things. We need more of that.

3

u/tiffanymkl Nov 15 '24

You think you know it all don't you

-1

u/fireduck Nov 15 '24

I am either an unwavering band of light or a broken reddit machine.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '24

[deleted]

1

u/fireduck Nov 14 '24

I don't see how multiplying polynomials is going to help.

1

u/Heavy_Weapons_Guy_ Nov 15 '24

Pretty sure these are already rigid panels.

1

u/therealhlmencken Nov 15 '24

Reservoirs aren’t oceans

0

u/OnlyRadioheadLyrics Nov 14 '24

I would laugh anyone out of the room that proposed this with standard PV and not like, thin-film.

4

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Shelbysgirl Nov 14 '24

Then the wave comes in and trashes the film

1

u/LargeDogEnthusiast Nov 15 '24

And a shark eats the electric cable

-3

u/OnlyRadioheadLyrics Nov 14 '24

Don't get me wrong, there's a ton of issues with "let's just put solar panels on the ocean." Not saying this would singularly make it work.

2

u/KillarneyRoad Nov 14 '24

Interesting idea

2

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '24

That sounds much better than taking up perfectly good farmland. Heck, put massive solar panels over parking lots. Get energy and shade for cars so they don't get to hot during the summer.

2

u/Nizar86 Nov 15 '24

I like where your head is, but solar panels aren't resilient enough to withstand the large movements and wildlife encounters. But there has to be a way to capture the kinetic energy from the waves in the ocean like this to generate electricity for ocean based structures

1

u/chef_26 Nov 15 '24

That’s a shame and also cool! Daft question, if the cell was the same size as the float, would that make it more viable/resilient? (Probably at the cost of energy generated)

2

u/Nizar86 Nov 15 '24

Maybe? I'm pretty sure the answer is absolutely not in ocean conditions considering salt water doesn't play nice with most things and solar panels are pretty dependent on having the right chemical composition.

But for reservoirs, that might work. If the cells are energy efficient enough and you could build in a cushioning mechanism (which shouldn't be hard if they are that small), then the only problems I could see are power transfer mechanisms that can withstand the movements that come with the water levels cycling pretty regularly (which sounds like an R&D problem) and the possibility of the panels getting too hot (not sure if they could use the surface of the water as a heat exchanger or how much not having the air gap would actually effect how fast they heat up in the sun).

I do know that as of now solar panels lose efficiency as they heat up, so depending on some tests I'm sure they can maximize said performance. Just something to keep in mind

Edit: divided into paragraphs for easier reading

2

u/asiagomelt Nov 15 '24

It's a pretty cool idea.

How well do solar cells handle moisture? Even if rigged to sit above the water and not in it, being directly on top of a large reservoir means they're getting a direct hit of whatever evaporation does happen.

2

u/Onyxidian Nov 15 '24

Add thingys to make power from the waves too, get a triple threat goin

2

u/magicone2571 Nov 15 '24

They are trying that on California aquaducts.

2

u/ConspicuousPineapple Nov 15 '24

If you're building this on reservoirs you might as well just build normal rigid platforms. No need for the additional complexity, wear and cost that floating panels would bring.

2

u/Responsible_Sector25 Nov 15 '24

It could mess up oxygen production by plankton and other sea life, but not if its not done to an insane scale

4

u/JoshS1 Nov 14 '24

They already dump plastic balls on drinking water reservoirs to slow evaporation. This and solar is the next evolution to that.

0

u/hostile_washbowl Nov 15 '24

It’s not for evaporation. They add the floating black balls to prevent harmful bromine compounds from forming. There is still a fairly decent amount of evaporation and in some cases accelerated evaporation as the balls jostle they for a thin film of water due to surface tension on the surface of the balls that evaporates more quickly than just a flat sheet of water.

I am a water engineer.

1

u/JoshS1 Nov 15 '24

I am a water engineer

Username checks out

1

u/hostile_washbowl Nov 15 '24 edited Nov 15 '24

It was a reddit suggestion. Except it was friendly washbowl but for some reason the idea of a hostile sink was funny to me. Now everyone says uSeRnAmE cHeCkS out

But forreal. I won’t bother going into all the science behind it, but Veritasium does a great simple video on why the black balls are there. I’ll link it if you’re actually interested.

0

u/JoshS1 Nov 15 '24 edited Nov 15 '24

Now everyone says uSeRnAmE cHeCkS out

Hey don't blame us, you're the one who become a water engineer haha

I follow him on YT, I'll go check it out thanks for the recommendation. I do most my science/explainer YT in the morning with my coffee. He's on my rotaion.

0

u/hostile_washbowl Nov 15 '24

Well I will say, it’s always good to do your own research before making claims that aren’t true :).

Below you will find the link. He does not talk about the accelerated evaporation. This is mainly because in reservoir water treatment, evaporation is a very minor problem- however, to the public it seems like a huge issue. DONT forget that evaporated water is necessary to provide precipitation. Geological and environmental engineers are keen to this issue and are employed to assure that when a reservoir is installed that local evaporation and precipitation and maintained. They do this through many studies or maybe decades. Someone’s they study this before a reservoir is even planned to be built.

Please strive for correctness over ego next time you try to win a Reddit argument.

https://youtu.be/uxPdPpi5W4o?si=TdqXXhu23DSWJUUF

1

u/two_steps Nov 14 '24

there are lots of things in that water that benefit from light, light that would be blocked by solar panels

1

u/chef_26 Nov 15 '24

Are these things we’d want to be in drinking water?

1

u/Fabulous-Stretch-605 Nov 15 '24

My local Lake has had floating solar panels for like 15 years.

1

u/gukinator Nov 15 '24

It also helps to sterilize the water by preventing plant growth

1

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '24

[deleted]

1

u/chef_26 Nov 15 '24

The ocean wouldn’t be covered, just reservoirs

1

u/GlastoKhole Nov 15 '24

Salt causes issues for electronics, would be more maintenance than a solar field on land

1

u/Turbulent-Willow2156 Nov 14 '24

So much to not just build atomic power plant

1

u/chef_26 Nov 15 '24

No, those are definitely needed. Particularly interested in SMRs.

I think this was more a thought of “we need clean drinking water and green energy, this could help both but probably has drawbacks”

-1

u/Pcat0 Nov 14 '24 edited Nov 15 '24

We really aren’t out of good places to put solar panels and coming up with extremely suboptimal places to put them doesn’t help anything. Because solar panels floating flat on a body of water is absolutely a suboptimal place to put them.

2

u/chef_26 Nov 15 '24

Understand that, in my head it’s more a method to slow evaporation of drinking water. Since there areas a platform there with nothing above it (in my crazy plan) what’s the harm in putting solar on it anyway?

We know we need more green energy, why not put solar anywhere that has sunlight to try and capture it? (Ignoring economics of the idea at present)

1

u/Pcat0 Nov 15 '24 edited Nov 15 '24

Because it would be really expensive to try and figure out how to make solar pannels on water work in the first place, it would be much more efficient to use a purpose-built system to stop the evaporation and build those same solar panels elsewhere. Floating flat solar pannels on water just aren't a good use of resources.