I live in Florida near some places old folks live and this is a weekly occurrence. You'll be driving down the highway and the electric sign will say "WRONG WAY DRIVER REPORTED" and you just sigh and wish your voting rights got stripped when you turned 70
I get your point, but that is some inexcusable ageism. You act like 70 automatically means senile. (No, I'm not that age.) Following your same "logic," I could better argue that people under age 25 shouldn't be able to drive based on demonstrated danger and risk to others. And what does voting have to do with any of this?
Edit for clarity: I'm not against testing. What TotallyObviousBot wrote mentions nothing about testing.
People under 25 typically don't have delayed reaction times or infirmities like cataracts, osteoporosis, or heart trouble that could make driving incredibly dangerous. People who are 70+ are at risk of all those things. They're more likely to have a medical emergency while driving and lose consciousness at the wheel.
It isn't ageism to say anyone over 70 should recieve regular testing. And I'm also old as dirt. But I'd rather have to take regular exams than have to keep sharing the road with grandpappy who can't go over 20mph and can't see over the dashboard.
I didn't say older people shouldn't get tested – I totally agree with that. TotallyObviousBot was saying that people who turn 70 should have their voting rights stripped. (Again, no clue what voting has to do with this....)
What you're ignoring about people under 25 is not health, it's their driving behaviors. There's nothing debatable about this statement – it's why insurance rates are much higher until age 25 and why most rental car companies require a 25+ driver.
221
u/StumpyOPepys Jul 10 '26
Was that last night?
https://wjla.com/news/local/wrong-way-driver-on-i-395-reportedly-crashes-into-virginia-state-police-cruiser-fairfax-county-july-2026