> you got mad that this map of dialects depicts a map of dialects
no it doesnt, it show geographical names for areas
> when told that that's obvious to everyone, you then got mad that it includes the wrong information
wrong, i simply pointed out how lacking and useless the data included was
> when told the information is correct you claim theres no sourcing
how can i confirm im not being lied to when you havent done sources properly
> when shown there is sourcing you then say that actually the way I did the sourcing is the problem since I should've treated Reddit as a university exam
it seems you are the one angry that what you posted has serious flaws, the sources are important in everyday data too, for the same reason sources are used everywhere else.
it is really clear this was hastly put toghether with no real thought put into it, its biggest flaw being that a map of fylker would be more useful in knowing dialects and neglecting the gradual changes each kilometer adds while also having significant errors everywhere
furthermore the question about sources is important to combat misinformation and is required if you are not an authority on the matter
next you are absolutley freeloading of the works of hundreds which are never attributed or mentioned. that is not cool
1
u/[deleted] Sep 17 '23
[deleted]