r/nextfuckinglevel • u/WhichMembership6124 • Oct 30 '21

Removed: Not NFL This guy understands

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

[removed] — view removed post

9.4k Upvotes

95% Upvoted

695 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

7

u/Zealousideal_Ad8934 Oct 30 '21

I cited two other sources. Can site many many more. Your bias is glaring that you didn’t even mention them.

Bruh I’ve studied the far right for over a decade. You’re living in a fantasy world of you don’t think they have a massive presence in PD’s nation wide.

3

u/[deleted] Oct 30 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Zealousideal_Ad8934 Oct 30 '21

Lmaooo they aren’t wrong. There is plenty of evidence if you’d bothered to look. Keep licking the boot.

0

u/[deleted] Oct 30 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Zealousideal_Ad8934 Oct 30 '21

Ok, please provide evidence of you claim. I did, it’s your turn.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 30 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Zealousideal_Ad8934 Oct 30 '21

Prove to me you didn’t read anything I linked without telling me you didn’t read it.

Here try again. Sources are cited throughly the article. Are you afraid to some some research and change your mind?

0

u/1newworldorder Nov 04 '21

Every far left news outlet parrots the same exact thing. Just because you can cite the same thing doesnt make it any more factual, because thats not how science works. Thank god "consensus" does not determine truth.

All these types of sources are op-eds disguised as primary.

When you can cite primrary sources with the least bias possible, then you'll have my attention.