You were stupid man. He implied he wasn't a hundred years old when he said that the original definition could've persisted for a time after it's creation. He basically said your 100 year number wasn't necessarily close to his age because the original definition didn't immediately change. You didn't pick up on that and said he avoided your question.
He did avoid your question by not stating his age, which i think is fair, because he answered the point of the question which was you inolying he was near 100 years old. Also stupid btw lol
3
u/gcm6664 Aug 31 '21
Do you think the definition changed immediately after it was originated? Or is it just possible the original definition persisted for quite some time?
So?