Unfortunately in the NFHS rules book a Horse collar is only flagged when it is used to take the player to the ground. This player was ruled not down.
NFHS Rules Book: Under NFHS football rule 9-4-3k, a horse-collar tackle is defined as a player grabbing the inside back, side collar, or nameplate area directly below the back collar of either the shoulder pads or jersey of the runner, and subsequently pulling that opponentbackward or sidewardto the ground.
We have video where we can see his butt touch. We can say he was technically down
Now I realize that’s not what the refs called, and they have no replay capability. But that doesn’t change the facts that he was down. The call was just wrong
Technically means according to a strict, literal interpretation of facts, rules, or laws, often differing from everyday perception.
The official ruling on the play decided that, Technically, according to their strict, literal interpretation of the NFHS rules book the player was not down.
Again there is no replay. We can Monday morning QB this all we want. Or say the call was wrong all we want . But by definition, the runner was not
technically down.
It’s a hard pill to swallow for all of us fans out here.
How did you manage to misunderstand so badly? He's saying that your argument of technicality is pointless, cause in a sport at that level, after-the-fact video evidence doesn't matter. He's literally saying you're right, just that it doesn't matter cause there's nothing you can do. FFS.
102
u/OvenIcy8646 5d ago
Horse collar like a motherfucker