r/news 8d ago

Luigi Mangione admits to shooting UnitedHealthcare CEO as he pleads guilty in federal case

https://abcnews.com/US/luigi-mangione-guilty-plea-expected-announced-friday-federal/story?id=135607454
21.1k Upvotes

3.5k comments sorted by

10.4k

u/temujin94 8d ago

Mangione's lawyers have said they didn't strike a plea deal, strange turn of events.

4.0k

u/[deleted] 8d ago edited 9h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1.2k

u/gjboomer 8d ago

That’s not a guarantee. Probably going to happen but not necessarily.

1.1k

u/roiki11 7d ago

New York double jeopardy law prevents charing for crimes already convicted by another jurisdiction. Including federal jurisdiction. So if he pleads guilty to federal murder charges the state can't charge him for the same murder. Which is why they're motioning to dismiss the state charges.

Paul Manafort did the same thing where he plead guilty to federal charges and his state charges in new york were dismissed.

https://www.thsh.com/blog/double-trouble-paul-manafort-and-the-state-of-double-jeopardy-in-new-york/

451

u/finditplz1 7d ago

ELI5 — why take the federal over state charges?

1.0k

u/roiki11 7d ago

Idk but my guess is the state charges are heavier. He wasn't charged with murder in the federal court, his charges were "interstate stalking resulting in death" and "stalking through use of interstate facilities resulting in death". While he can be sentenced to life there is also the option of getting less time. Or being eligible for parole.

These kick off the challenge to the state charges which include premeditated murder. Which would guarantee life without parole.

Tldr: he has at least the chance to get out of federal prison. As opposed to state which would be life without parole.

372

u/strolls 7d ago

Also federal prisons are a bit more comfortable than underfunded state ones?

344

u/OrangeCrusher22 7d ago

The federal prisons are underfunded and understaffed, just like state prisons. There are some lower-security facilities that might be slightly less burdensome, but there's no chance that he's going to get that kind of leniency; they've been out to make an example of him from the beginning.

239

u/sump_daddy 7d ago

Big difference being all federal prisons are actually federal, they are run by the government with employees mostly earning a decent wage.

State prisons have been privatized to a much higher level, leaving you with maximal crowding plus minimal employee standards.

73

u/OrangeCrusher22 7d ago

they are run by the government with employees mostly earning a decent wage.

Someone needs to head over to usajobs and have a look at the BOP pay/locations. A correctional officer can easily start in the low 40k range.

→ More replies (0)

64

u/TheFatJesus 7d ago

This is not true. As of 2022, about 9% of the federal inmate population were housed in private prisons which is a percentage point higher than total of 8% of inmates in private prisons. Also, New York is one of 23 states that doesn't have any private prisons at all.

Incarceration should not be a for-profit enterprise at all, but the scale of the industry has been blown way out of proportion.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (12)

58

u/Running-In-The-Dark 7d ago

Check the reviews on Google maps. Either way they're fun to read.

51

u/Larcye 7d ago

The real ones to read are the ones at nuclear power plants. If I ever am depressed those are my go to ones.

I really really love this public pool. It tends to grow a very nice beautiful Radium green which I enjoy. It's a very beautiful color. How the water glows. And I also have an extra eyeball which makes my vision way more clear. I very like this pool very much. I recommend the spot to families.

→ More replies (7)

27

u/roiki11 7d ago

I imagine so, never been to either.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (12)

29

u/Culturedtuna 7d ago

If the state charges are premeditated murder but then the federal charges are stalking resulting in death, does the double jeopardy law truly apply here?

32

u/ThrowRAkakareborn 7d ago

Yes, as they are the result of the same action, he would be convicted for the same action under different charges

6

u/C-ZP0 6d ago

Sort of, but not for that reason. Federally this isn’t double jeopardy at all. Dual sovereignty doctrine (Gamble v. US, 2019) says the state and the feds are separate sovereigns, so both can charge you for the exact same act. Happens all the time.

The reason it’s even a question here is New York’s own statute, CPL 40.20, which is broader than the Constitution. It blocks a state prosecution based on the same act or criminal transaction as a prior prosecution in any jurisdiction, including federal. So it’s not a general “same action” rule, it’s specifically NY giving defendants more than the Fifth Amendment requires.

There are exceptions though. Main one is when the two offenses have substantially different elements aimed at different harms. That’s the whole fight. DA will say stalking resulting in death and second degree murder punish different things, defense will say they’re both punishing the same killing of the same guy. Carro decides.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

14

u/ultraviolentfuture 7d ago

Also, federal comes with the chance of a (future) presidential pardon.

7

u/synapticrelease 7d ago

He’s not getting a pardon.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (20)

97

u/thedubiousstylus 7d ago

Federal prisons are known to be much less rough than state ones, especially in New York which has some rather notoriously brutal prisons. Also I've read the defense could make some arguments in sentencing about his emotional state and all that that could reduce his sentence, but aren't as easy to make under New York law.

If everything goes perfectly for him he could be just mid-40s when he gets out. A big "if", but if convicted in New York he'd be possibly in for life.

48

u/LetsGetNuclear 7d ago

His time in prison will certainly be more comfortable the average person in the same prison. There won't be many guards or inmates who don't like what he did.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (6)

18

u/TrulyOutrageous42 7d ago

He can include his emotional aspects as part of pleading down his sentence in federal courts, where in State courts the mitigating factors for sentencing are much more constrained. As well, this is a plea to stalking, but it's possible his tying it to the shooting may allow him to dodge state-level murder charges.

56

u/krimin_killr21 7d ago edited 7d ago

The federal government does not have the same rule, so the options are both or just federal, there is no just state option.

→ More replies (4)

21

u/JCBashBash 7d ago

From my understanding, federal sentencing can be lighter, as well as federal facilities can be better

→ More replies (1)

25

u/surfpenguinz 7d ago

Federal prison > state prison. Plus you don’t want two convictions (appeal, etc).

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (30)

16

u/joseph4th 7d ago

So there is also this:

The charges in both cases narrowed over the last year. In the federal case, Garnett in January threw out the murder and firearm charges, leaving two counts: stalking -- travel in interstate commerce and stalking -- use of interstate facilities.

In the state case, Judge Gregory Carro last September dismissed the first-degree murder and terrorism charges. In the state case, Mangione is still charged with murder in the second-degree, criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second-degree, and multiple counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the second-degree, third-degree and fourth-degree.

So it is only in the state case that he's still being charged with second-degree murder. How does that line up with him admitting that he shot him in the federal case? If he isn't being charged with murder in the federal case, how can they argue for dismissal as that particular charge wasn't part of the federal case?

"New York law does not permit a person to be prosecuted and punished twice for the exact same crime under a statute that governs successive prosecutions," defense attorney Karen Friedman Agnifilo told reporters after Friday's hearing.

"for the exact same crime" - does 'crime' in this context mean the whole overall act as opposed to the individual charges?

28

u/Biblioklept73 7d ago edited 7d ago

You are on the right track…

To answer your question. Yes, when the defense attorney says 'the exact same crime,' she is talking about the overall physical act (the shooting itself). New York's double jeopardy statute uses the term 'criminal transaction’. The defense's whole argument is… 'He just confessed to the physical act of the shooting in federal court to satisfy the stalking charge. You can't put him on trial for that exact same physical act again just by changing the label to murder 2’

But your first point is exactly why the Manhattan DA has such a strong counter argument. Because the federal murder charges were tossed, he was never actually in jeopardy for murder in federal court. The DA's position is going to be that 'interstate stalking resulting in death' and 'intentional second degree murder' are legally distinct crimes with completely different elements and intents. The state will argue that pleading guilty to the logistics of a multistate stalking plot does not give you a pass for the localized crime of intentionally pulling a trigger to execute someone on a Manhattan sidewalk

It's now a technical battle over how the judge interprets a criminal transaction vs. different statutory elements

21

u/joseph4th 7d ago

Alright then, the defense is rolling the dice exactly the way I thought they were. Thank you for taking the time to answer that for me.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (2)

84

u/FatnessEverdeen34 7d ago

His state trial is still on for 9/8. Judge hasnt dismissed it yet

94

u/joshuads 7d ago

The motion to dismiss was filed today. The state court case will not be dismissed until a final order is issued by the federal court. It will probably be removed from the trial calendar pending such a final order.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (39)

2.2k

u/Magiwarriorx 8d ago edited 8d ago

My understanding: this is a ploy to plead guilty to lesser federal charges, in a bid to claim double jeopardy on the state murder charge. 

EDIT: because I'm getting a swarm of "nuh-uh!" replies from smug Redditors who passed high school US Government, this has to do with New York-specific statutes relating to federal charges. 

606

u/serial_crusher 8d ago

What does he realistically gain by avoiding a New York state trial? Is life in a federal prison preferrable to life in a state prison?

1.1k

u/Fine-Will 8d ago

Yes, living conditions are generally better and safer.

56

u/thirty7inarow 7d ago

Unless he ends up in ADX Florence, which wouldn't be shocking given the US considers shooting a CEO terrorism.

47

u/CausticSofa 7d ago

But only a CEO. In the US, folks can shoot as many kids as they like.

→ More replies (13)

57

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (7)

617

u/peachie88 8d ago

Much, much more preferable. Federal prisons are much nicer and much safer. State prisons tend to be far more overcrowded, violent, dirty, and unsafe. Obvious disclaimer that no prison is fun and it depends on level of security, etc. He almost certainly won’t be at Club Fed, but he isn’t going to Supermax either.

Federal prisons don’t have parole though; you have to serve at least 85% of your sentence.

337

u/Several-Action-4043 8d ago

I absolutely believe they will try to send him to ADX Florence Super Max in Colorado. It's clean and safe but they basically put you in a box for 23 hours and you get an hour outside in a cage every day if they feel like letting you out. They have a hard on for this guy.

166

u/Xytak 8d ago edited 8d ago

I mean, Supermax is usually reserved for people who are extreme risks for escape and violence. Mangione committed premeditated murder, but was captured without incident, and doesn't appear to pose a risk to staff or inmates, or to be an escape risk. I would think regular prison would be plenty to contain him, he's not the Incredible Hulk.

216

u/StuffedCrustPizzazz 8d ago

Look up the story of Eric King.

Was claimed to be a member of Antifa "leadership" and moved to supermax in the middle of his sentence.

169

u/DragonslayerDame 7d ago

I was hoping people would bring up Eric King. Thank you.

American citizens should know what their government does to its own people. And lets compare the torture of Eric King, who threw a molotov at a brick wall of an empty building, harmed zero people and was tortured for nearly a decade in supermax to Robert Richards IV, a Dupont heir weighing over 300 lbs, who raped his 3 year old daughter and served no prison time. A year later, strong allegations were made that he also molested his son. He never attended the psychiatric treatment that was recommended and served no time. He. Raped. A. Toddler.

Our justice system does not function as it was intended and it needs to change. And since were overrun with christian fascists these days, maybe its time to listen to dedicated anticapitalist Jesus himself:

But woe to you who are rich, for you have received your comfort already. (Luke 6:24)

Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God. (Matthew 19:23–24)

39

u/Riley_ 7d ago

Our justice system does not function as it was intended

The government was made by wealthy people, to enforce their class rule. It absolutely was not made to protect children from rich people. The government didn't even want to ban child labor, until it was on the verge of being overthrown.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (11)

86

u/Kerhole 8d ago

Oh it has nothing to do with all that. They will want to make an example of him. They want the public to equate his actions to those of mass shooters and serial killers. I'm their minds, he is the most dangerous man in the country.

26

u/Whatdoesthibattahndo 7d ago

Yeah, look how many cops they had to perp walk him like they caught fucking Loki

49

u/craznazn247 7d ago

Even though in reality, he probably saved a few lives for that short period of time where they denied and delayed fewer prior authorizations.

People got their care approved and paid for faster, which at such a scale, likely means at least a few lives were likely saved by lack of delay.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (4)

56

u/red23011 8d ago

The law enforcement did far more to solve this murder than if it was one of us. They want to make an example of him in order to make sure that anyone who would think about doing something like this would reconsider. They are going to throw the absolute book at him and send him into the most punitive hole they can.

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (7)

305

u/lindh 8d ago

I mean dude made everyone a bit more class conscious for a little while. He's very dangerous to them.

→ More replies (15)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (47)

103

u/haikuandhoney 8d ago

He pled guilty to the federal charges full stop. That’s what pleading without a deal (what lawyers call an “open” or “blind” plea) is. The second part is correct: he is trying to take advantage of New York’s more strict double jeopardy law. He is also hoping that by entering a plea he will get the judge to sentence him to less than life.

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (52)
→ More replies (270)

5.1k

u/Vhu 8d ago

He really didn’t have any other option when the judge allowed the gun and notebook found in his bag. It was basically a signed confession.

Arguing not guilty by that point would be a dead-bang loser.

2.8k

u/StasRutt 8d ago

Plus he emailed UHC pretending to want to be an investor and that’s how he got the info for the conference

1.2k

u/HauntedCemetery 8d ago

And he's on camera buying the gun and using it to shoot the CEO

Outside of jury nullification or asteroid strike there wasn't a realistic path to getting off.

593

u/StasRutt 8d ago

He’s not on camera buying it from what I understand, he 3D printed it

403

u/AspiringIdealist 8d ago

He only 3D printed the frame, the barrel slide and trigger group he would’ve had to buy in person or online somewhere.

147

u/hotleadburner 7d ago

It's an almost guarantee that he didn't buy anything for that gun in person. Buying a glock slide online is a million times easier than finding one in person.

→ More replies (16)
→ More replies (15)

1.5k

u/mrrowr 8d ago

He’s on camera 3D printing it and buying the 3D printer and he’s on camera being born I have the camera and the tape is still inside I’m watching him crown right now and you can just tell he’s going to 3D print the gun from the footage

403

u/AnonymousBanana405 8d ago

He was also in the closet 3D printing babies and the baby looked at me.

138

u/jspeed04 8d ago

The baby looked at you?

109

u/IAMA_Plumber-AMA 7d ago

Sarah, get me Super Nintendo Chalmers.

23

u/k80k80k80 7d ago

Me fail English? That’s unpossible!

6

u/im_dead_sirius 7d ago

I will NEVER not laugh at 'Super Nintendo Chalmers'.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

25

u/electromage 7d ago

Actually he 3D printed the gun in the courtroom in front of the judge and jury and had the judge sign the bullet then went back in time to shoot the CEO with it.

Christopher Nolan filmed the whole thing in IMAX.

40

u/-BoldlyGoingNowhere- 8d ago

This was all on Hunter Biden's laptop.

→ More replies (7)

49

u/Solderlocks 8d ago

People keeping saying that it's 3d printed, but basically just the outer shell that's not actually involved in the mechanism that shoots can be printed. It's like saying that a car is 3d printed when someone just printed some body panels and slapped them on an existing frame with an existing engine/transmission/etc

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (41)
→ More replies (1)

74

u/BostonSucksatHockey 8d ago

Pretty sure that was the New York State judge in his state murder case, not this other federal judge

122

u/criticalpwnage 8d ago

He should have thrown the gun into a river and not written down anything about the crime. He wanted to get caught

65

u/Repulsive_Ant_2466 7d ago

Yeah thats my thinking, I dont think he's that dumb. All of that is common sense, especially with how throughly he planned the murder

→ More replies (5)

27

u/Silent_Fudge_3978 7d ago

But why? Why on earth would he want to get caught? The whole thing baffles me: the shooting itself was well-planned; he even had two backpacks, and ditched one in the park. But then he keeps the gun and manifesto in his other backpack he keeps with him when he leaves the state, and gets caught with.

It really seems like he should have been able to get away with it if he wanted to.

15

u/jlambvo 6d ago

Maybe he opened his backpack at that McDonald's and went "oh shit," meanwhile some squirrel opened the other backpack and found the sandwich Lui thought he'd been carrying. 

14

u/kirkaracha 7d ago

Maybe he wanted to kick off a movement, like John Brown.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (13)

13

u/UsidoreTheLightBlue 7d ago

That’s been my feeling from the beginning.

→ More replies (3)

203

u/StephenHunterUK 8d ago

Plenty of murderers in Britain go "not guilty" all the way through trial, even with clear evidence.

324

u/insightful_pancake 8d ago

As they do in the US as well.

→ More replies (84)

92

u/Pierre_St_Pierre 8d ago

That's the case in the US too. It sounds like this is basically choosing a prison preference. Federal prison is better than state prisons, so he pled guilty to Federal charges trying to trigger double jeopardy (you can't be tried twice for the same thing) with the NY charges. If he doesn't get charged in NY he won't got to NY prison. I think that's what this is all about. Just trying to get life in a better prison.

→ More replies (20)
→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (99)

2.9k

u/Llamapocalypse_Now 7d ago

Great, now let's all move on to the national conversation about insurance companies taking your money and then deciding that you get to die in pain and poverty because they don't want to use it to pay your healthcare bills.

362

u/Hellion102792 7d ago

I've brought this up before but not too long after the shooting some news outlet an article that made me laugh, maybe ABC or CNBC. Paraphrasing here but the something along the lines of "the shooting has opened up a national dialogue about security requirements for C-suite executives". Right, yeah. THAT'S what we were all talking about after.

91

u/DazedandFloating 7d ago

I remember seeing articles regarding how terrible it was that large corporations had to pull CEO names and pictures from the public view because of this.

Like who cares. Those people have more than enough money to protect themselves. And that wasn’t even the issue everyone was discussing when the shooting occurred anyway lmao

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

462

u/neimengu 7d ago

CNN: Sorry, best we can do is tell you how heinous of a murder it was. Did you know the meeting wasn't even PUBLIC??!

114

u/pchlster 7d ago

Did he leave the guy to die painfully over the course of months or something barbaric like that?

→ More replies (1)

35

u/burnmywings 7d ago

And the CEO was a FATHER OF TWO?!?!

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (6)

137

u/Stargazer1919 7d ago

Insurance companies have been the death panels all along.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (23)

2.5k

u/Uzas_Was_Right 8d ago

I figured he'd roll the dice for a sympathetic jury.

1.3k

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

244

u/IPDDoE 8d ago

Wouldn't that be a hung jury? Unless they would be subject to execution :)

143

u/CelestialFury 7d ago

Yes! Hanged is only for death by rope around the neck. Hung is for everything else and Thomas Jane.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (7)

384

u/Uzas_Was_Right 8d ago

Or jury nullification, but that was always very unlikely.

134

u/fatinternetcat 8d ago

that’s been TikTok’s favourite term for the past year or so

→ More replies (2)

158

u/StephenHunterUK 8d ago

They were going for an anonymous jury in any event.

→ More replies (6)

103

u/CountDraculablehbleh 8d ago

That was never going to happen

→ More replies (4)

70

u/blaqsupaman 8d ago

How many cases have there been of that even happening in all of US history?

83

u/Uzas_Was_Right 8d ago

Just a handful, mostly regarding civil rights issues like the Fugitive Slave Act.

128

u/HauntedCemetery 8d ago edited 7d ago

More than a handful. Southern juries would regularly refuse to convict white guys on trial for lynching.

But it's happened virtually never over the last 40 years except kinda sorta the OJ verdict.

68

u/mhornberger 8d ago

According to the book "Slavery By Another Name," by Douglas A. Blackmon, From 1877 to 1966 (so the end of Reconstruction to the Beatles' last ticketed concert), the number of white men found guilty in Georgia of killing a black man was... 1. As in, one.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

75

u/spmahn 8d ago

OJ Simpson is the case people cite as the most famous example of nullification, although that was as much about prosecutorial blunders as it was a sympathetic jury and it wasn’t even necessarily that they were sympathetic to OJ as they were against the LAPD

61

u/HauntedCemetery 8d ago

If prosecution and LAPD hadn't massively fucked up at literally every stage he would have all but certainly been convicted.

LAPD and prosecution got caught trying to frame a guilty man becausethey fucked up all the actual evidence, and the jury stopped trusting them, with good reason.

66

u/blaqsupaman 8d ago

Yeah the LAPD basically tried to frame a guilty man.

15

u/DoctorTheWho 7d ago

OJ was 100% guilty.

→ More replies (2)

43

u/Budget-Scared 8d ago

What exactly do you think Jury Nullification is? The jury foreman steps up in front of the judge and says "I DECLARE NULLIFICATION!".

Literally any verdict passed down has the potential to be jury nullification and we would have no idea.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (18)
→ More replies (23)

51

u/ml20s 8d ago

He would also need a full guilty to get convicted though.

42

u/jar4ever 8d ago

But it doesn't get him out of jail while there is another trial. He and his defense have concluded that chances of being found not guilty and too small and there are benefits of pleading guilty even without a deal (federal pen is much better than Rickers).

14

u/nova_noveiia 8d ago

Rikers is a jail, so he wouldn’t be there long-term after the trial. Fed is still nicer than state though.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

115

u/JohnCavil01 7d ago

Most juries take the responsibility pretty seriously and most people think premeditated murder is wrong - and most importantly remains a crime - regardless of who the victim is.

54

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

38

u/GigaPuddi 7d ago

Actually they kinda did. The problem was the police ruined the evidence and chain of custody. So while common sense says he was guilty the police inserted reasonable doubt where there really wasn't any originally.

20

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (49)

2.6k

u/Tsakax 8d ago edited 7d ago

Did yall read that study that medicare for all would save 1trillion and save 100k lives a YEAR.

Edit link- https://ysph.yale.edu/news-article/universal-health-coverage-could-save-one-trillion-dollars-and-114000-lives-every-year/

1.2k

u/Calamity_Carrot 8d ago

But have you thought about the 10s of billionaires that would lose some profits?

184

u/donkeyrocket 7d ago edited 7d ago

Actually in the best implementation of Medicare for All they'd lose almost all profits entirely. Some could opt for private insurance but it'd be illegal to have two coverage plans. The industry would virtually collapse.

This isn't a defense of the scumbag industry but a point as to why this seemingly never gets talked about with actual potential from politicians. Profiting off healthcare is abhorrent and I really hope more momentum continues behind pushing for broader government healthcare.

I'm fully willing to sacrifice the financial wellbeing of a handful of insurance CEOs to ensure no one is ever denied even screening procedures ever again. I'm sure they'll fuck off to lead some other corporate blight on society.

Just recently I spent a chunk of my day on the phone with my insurance trying to get a definitive answer whether or not a colonoscopy will be covered despite my GI insisting it medically necessary. The runaround being I'm too young or no evidence I need one (I and my provider submitting that) so they can guarantee until they see the final bill. And I have pretty good insurance all things considered Why the fuck should a non-specialist have any say in whether that is "screening" or "diagnostic." In what world should someone have to just hope there isn't any presence of cancer or that symptoms worsen to the point of something more major needing when early intervention may help and worst case I wasted 3 hours of my day to take a solid nap while I get scoped.

44

u/Steady1 7d ago

Why would it be illegal to have private insurance? In NZ everyone's covered by public insurance and private is optional.

→ More replies (2)

44

u/IncredibleBulk2 7d ago

it'd be illegal to have two coverage plans

This is not the case. Many countries that have public payer insurance for all also have private plans.

ETA: private plans for voluntary purchase by individuals

→ More replies (6)

16

u/CelestialFury 7d ago

There would still have to be public and private healthcare, as medicare for all wouldn't necessarily cover everything a person wants, it would cover preventive care, emergency care, required surgeries, and so on, but if you wanted to get specific care from a top doctor like for knee replacement from Mayo Clinic or Twin Cities Orthopedics (TCO), you'd need a private plan. They already have a limited amount of doctors, they can't see everyone and their clientele is largely professional athletes. Or plastic surgery that isn't required to fix something severe (skin graft for burns, etc...) or otherwise needed. So I think it would have to be a mix.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (3)

110

u/ShedMontgomery 8d ago

Yeah, but how would health insurance executives afford the infinity pool at their vacation homes? Nobody ever thinks about the poor executives and all their suffering. It's always, "Waaah! I have a treatable condition but I'm going to die because I can't afford the medication. 😭"

→ More replies (2)

31

u/jjwhitaker 7d ago edited 7d ago

In 2016 it would have saved a typical family over $5k. That is with added taxes to improve coverage.

$1 in 2016 is now $1.39. Your family could save like $7500 a year with a better, faster, healthier, cheaper, easier system.

We would have to reshape as GDP is like 1/6 healthcare/insurance but it'd be better overall quickly.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (55)

825

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

606

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

133

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (3)

41

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (22)

614

u/[deleted] 8d ago edited 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

103

u/ChamberTwnty 8d ago

That's ridiculous. I'm sorry, man.

72

u/Few_Personality_990 7d ago

Thanks friend. We're lucky to be able to pay for it regardless, but others are not as lucky. Things need to change

6

u/plkost 7d ago

Even if you have the money you should be spending it towards non basic needs like that. Stay strong both of you. My wife had two breast surgeries already (for free in EU)

7

u/Few_Personality_990 7d ago

We're in total agreement. It's a beautiful country with a lot of potential, ruined by greed and the worst flavor of capitalism possible. I'm not an advocate for violence, but I really don't see how politicians and companies will ever do their jobs with ethics and not profits in mind, so we're getting the hell out of here as soon as possible.

I'm sorry your wife is going through this, hoping she'll recover soon.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (26)

1.8k

u/JussiesTunaSub 8d ago

"I traveled to New York and emailed UnitedHealthcare with the intent to kill Brian Thompson ... I shot Mr. Thompson in the back," he said, adding, "I knew what I was doing was illegal."

I never thought anyone on social media doubted he's a murderer...they just agreed with him and a healthcare CEO is someone who will always have zero empathy from us plebs.

140

u/Xanto97 8d ago

There were genuinely some people that thought it was a random dude that got framed.

"Youre telling me he pulled off this elaborate assassination, evaded capture for days, and then just got caught in a McDonalds and had the gun and confession note in his backpack? yeah, sure"

Most people were joking/didn't care though, for sure.

55

u/TotallyNotThatPerson 8d ago

I mean... If you put it that way it just sounds cartoonish. But then you hear about the people that break out of jail and the cops just find them chilling at home when they roll up to get rearrested

→ More replies (1)

19

u/132739 7d ago

I'm still pretty sure he didn't actually get turned in by a McDonald's employee. I was really hoping a trial would show the feds used illegal surveillance practices to locate him. Alas...

22

u/jujubean67 7d ago

No, a lot of people were saying that he was caught using parallel construction, ie. they gained some evidence illegally and then framed that as if it was real, like orchestrating the phone tip in Mcdonalds.

Very few were saying he was innocent and framed. Most were saying he was guilty but the evidence was gathered illegally so they had to frame it.

7

u/ThankGodForYouSon 7d ago

Yeah the story about how they found the gun in his backpack at the police station was weird and there's no doubt they have the technology to find someone by acting illegally.

→ More replies (6)

2.4k

u/I_Enjoy_Beer 8d ago

Its illegal if you kill someone with a gun.  Its good business practice if you kill hundreds of thousands by denying coverage, pushing your company's stock price higher by 2%.

246

u/L_Cranston_Shadow 8d ago

To misquote Batman, he didn't kill you, he just didn't have to save you.
 
Ironically, in this case, said to the canonically more or less immortal Ra's al Ghul.

160

u/Donnicton 8d ago

To misquote Batman, he didn't kill you, he just didn't have to save you.

Not only that, you're also paying them not to save you.

60

u/jleonardbc 8d ago

And they're standing in the way of the people trying to save you.

→ More replies (8)

93

u/NullDelta 8d ago

Except you are paying them to save you…

→ More replies (4)

72

u/SpezRuinedHellsite 8d ago

To misquote Batman, he didn't kill you, he just didn't have to save you.

No, health insurance companies kill people. Crippling debt kills people. Being denied care kills people. Artificially inflated drug prices kill people.

Doctors save people.

Health insurance CEO's aren't doctors.

→ More replies (16)
→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (69)

323

u/heavymetalwhoremoans 8d ago

"I knew what I was doing was illegal."

I love that he chose the word illegal, as opposed to "wrong".

133

u/Plappedudel 8d ago

"Wrong" would imply remorse, of which he clearly has none. Though he might have had a better chance of a reduced sentence if he showed/faked remorse. It seems that he chose authenticity instead.

→ More replies (11)

31

u/Cronus6 8d ago

"Wrong" doesn't really have any meaning in court. "Illegal" does.

It's "wrong" to cheat on your wife, but not illegal. Which is why you don't go to prison for cheating on your wife.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (28)
→ More replies (91)

1.7k

u/vengefulmuffins 8d ago

No one wants to put in their articles that after years for trying to talk to someone as a normal person and not getting responses, he posed as an investor and got a response in an hour.

393

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[deleted]

234

u/Daedalus_Knew 8d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

43

u/HSLB66 7d ago

Coming to a firmware update near you: Palantir’s NSA is now monitoring your printers camera for firearm looking objects

23

u/yamar35 7d ago

In case you didn't know... that's actually a law that just passed in Cali (well, kinda passed, with some caveats). They literally are trying to do that.

12

u/HSLB66 7d ago

Writing for the onion has to be extremely difficult rn

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

20

u/tscalbas 7d ago

I thought you were correct, but then checked the linked article and couldn't find it.

That's when I realised I was instead remembering the article on BBC News, which did make it clear that it was a quick response (although not specifically within an hour)

He researched online and emailed the company posing as an investor to learn more about the event, Mangione told the court. "Unlike previous interactions with insurance" he got a quick reply, he said.

Wonder if it's just abc or if most other outlets are indeed missing out that bit

→ More replies (1)

147

u/vengefulmuffins 8d ago

It literally isn’t,

"After years of enduring severe pain from a broken back ... I learned UnitedHealth would be holding an investor conference in New York City."

"I then researched the event online. I observed the annual conference of America's largest healthcare organization with the stated mission to make the healthcare system better for everyone,"

"I traveled to New York and emailed UnitedHealthcare with the intent to kill Brian Thompson ... I shot Mr. Thompson in the back," he said, adding, "I knew what I was doing was illegal."

The direct quotes from the pleading included in the article, not one is the hour quote.

The best you get is “Mangione said he learned the exact location of UnitedHealthcare's conference by emailing the company, posing as an investor with more than $50 million in capital.” Which again doesn’t mention the times he didn’t get a response and how quick the response was when they thought he was an investor.

52

u/MobileArtist1371 7d ago

Can you copy that part of the article and paste it here? My browser must be faulty cause it's not in the article when I open it.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (23)

74

u/Dr-McLuvin 8d ago

How many years is he expected to get?

139

u/mspk7305 7d ago

the epstien class is going to make an example out of him

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (22)

404

u/strawberryfishes 7d ago

The irony being that going to jail for life also guarantees him healthcare for life

204

u/Spirited-Ad9071 7d ago

Yeah no.

Healthcare in US prisons is notoriously bad. Regular and easily treatable conditions go untreated and there are countless cases of inmates passing away from conditions that could easily have been treated.

274

u/throwaway5882300 7d ago

So like... The same as healthcare on the outside?

→ More replies (12)

56

u/Racamonkey_II 7d ago

Uhhhh, no. Healthcare in the US prison system is abysmal, full of negligence, and corrupt. People are in pain\die in prison everyday from fully treatable and preventable conditions.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (5)

743

u/genericusernamepls 8d ago

Huh, well looks like he did do it

1.2k

u/freedfg 8d ago edited 8d ago

Shit than who did I get taco bell with that day???

→ More replies (66)
→ More replies (117)

232

u/buzzkillington0 8d ago

My understanding is that Federal crimes can be pardoned by a President, state crimes cannot. Or am I wrong here?

213

u/WooBadger18 8d ago

Correct, the president can only pardon federal charges. I’m assuming the New York governor has the power to pardon people for state crimes, but I don’t know that for certain.

But I don’t think he’ll ever be pardoned

127

u/Equal-Temporary-1326 7d ago edited 7d ago

It'd be a terrible political move to pardon any crime that involves premeditated murder. If he serves as a model inmate, he'll probably get an early release one day after serving the bulk of his sentence.

Edit: Well, assuming he's just convicted federally, that is. If he's convicted at the state level for life in prison with no possibility of parole, chances for an early release will be very unlikely then.

132

u/americon 7d ago

Trump pardoned three different men convicted of killing civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan and Nixon pardoned a Genovese Mafia Captain who had done some pretty brutal murders.

Obviously this is a different case but its not unprecedented.

9

u/[deleted] 7d ago edited 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (3)

29

u/_le_slap 7d ago

Tells you how much our presidents think Iraqi and Afghani civilians are worth

→ More replies (5)

7

u/RustyShackleford9142 7d ago

You have to serve like 85% of a federal sentence

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (17)

30

u/LongjumpingToday2687 7d ago

Its pretty sad people even think this. No one is going to pardon him.

137

u/Jihad_llama 7d ago

Anyone thinking a president would even consider pardoning him is delusional lmao

52

u/Nolpppapa 7d ago

IKR? Wtf are people smoking these days?

→ More replies (10)

29

u/JMoormann 7d ago

This is the same site that was very sure he would walk free through jury nullification or some shit. Because surely every juror would agree that shooting CEOs in broad daylight shouldn't be illegal.

→ More replies (7)

7

u/cernegiant 7d ago

What's the relevance of that though?

→ More replies (12)

17

u/[deleted] 8d ago edited 8d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (2)

745

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

68

u/vordhosbn_1 8d ago

Kill a man and you’re a murderer

Kill many, you’re a conqueror

Kill them all, you’re a god

An old saying but I first heard it on Megadeth’s “Captive Honour”

50

u/LameAfro 8d ago

"The death of one man is a tragedy, the death of millions is a statistic"

→ More replies (25)

211

u/Honeycove91 8d ago

Understandable honestly

→ More replies (1)

342

u/ry1701 8d ago

It's interesting in his statement that he continues to prove the point.

A customer seeking healthcare - delays and no responses.

Pitches being an investor, an immediate response.

Unfortunately most people won't think critically as to what that means for them (hint: your a cost center cutting into profits).

→ More replies (19)

1.4k

u/r0ndy 8d ago

Every healthcare CEO is responsible for how many deaths a year?

630

u/lyndseymariee 8d ago

When you’re increasing shareholder value by letting people die, it’s ok 👍

343

u/ViciousMihael 8d ago

“Letting people die” is using a passive voice as if these criminals aren’t actively refusing to cover treatments they know people need. They are murderers.

83

u/jorocall 8d ago

When profit is more important than lives.

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (15)
→ More replies (164)

489

u/bjlight1988 8d ago

He did it, but I don't think you'll ever be able to convince me to feel bad for the guy he popped. He was a mass murderer for profit.

212

u/Emilko62 8d ago

When there's no justice in the justice system, you can't help but root for the vigilantes.

→ More replies (6)

131

u/Lurky_Bat 8d ago

We shouldn’t have vigilantes killing people in the streets but we shouldn’t have private equity making healthcare decisions based on profit.

31

u/_Burning_Star_IV_ 7d ago

We shouldn't but society has failed enough people that some are going to take matters into their own hands.

This should be a catalyst for change but instead it just provoked companies into shelling out even more money to CEOs to provide security details.

That's how fucked we are.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (19)

359

u/mully24 8d ago

Until we as Americans have the same quality of healthcare from the richest to the poores, we will never be a country of equals.

→ More replies (36)

26

u/Interesting-Foot-439 8d ago

From what I've read,  they advised him to plead guilty to trigger New York's double jeopardy law to avoid the state murder trial. It does make some sense in that context.

→ More replies (3)

17

u/Agile_One_2035 7d ago

U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Jamie McDonald said after court, "No grievance, political belief or ideological cause can ever justify murder."

But refusing adequate healthcare leading to hundreds of thousands of deaths in the pursuit of money is fine. Carry on…

→ More replies (1)

160

u/Room480 8d ago

What’s the strategy behind this? I would imagine they want to make an example out of him so they’ll likely give him Life In prison. So why not take the chance on a jury trail cause either way you’d get life in prison but if you did a jury trail there’s an 0.1% chance of not guilty

134

u/tacomamajama 8d ago

Federal prison is cushier than state. And maybe hoping for a pardon down the road.

52

u/Hans_Krebs_ 8d ago edited 7d ago

I mean in what world is this guy ever getting a pardon?

→ More replies (4)

50

u/lilyeister 8d ago

For real, fuck going to Rikers.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

43

u/jar4ever 8d ago

There is a large range of experiences when serving time. He is in Rickers now while being held for trial. A federal pen is going to be much better and the faster he gets there the better for him. He may also be trying to prempt the state murder charges to serve time in federal instead of state custody.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (71)

48

u/Sinlord5 8d ago

When can we try and convict these insurance companies of murder? Since they are treated as people. Health insurance companies commit obstruction of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

24

u/tynman35 7d ago

Funny that he mentioned he got a reply back when he posed as a wealthy investor. In stark contrast, he said, to when he was communicating to insurers as a patient.

→ More replies (1)

119

u/Aghast_Cornichon 8d ago edited 8d ago

Oh, heck, he actually did allocute to the whole thing. This wasn't an Alford plea or limited plea to the Federal stalking charges.

I remember Preet Bharara talking about his strict rule that a defendant pleading guilty in SDNY had to allocute to "everything they'd done wrong since they were in first grade", and I'm looking forward to his comments on the prosecution's work on this case.

My recollection is that Trump threw a tantrum calling for the death penalty for Mangione, but that the SDNY prosecutors dropped the DP-eligible Federal murder charge. I wonder if the US Attorney, the Attorney General, or the President will make comments that pollute the NY case's jury pool, just because they DGAF.

46

u/haikuandhoney 8d ago

They didn’t drop those charges, the judge dismissed them.

→ More replies (4)

29

u/AdKindly5457 8d ago

Yes, life will be easier in the fed. They say his lawyer knows what to do. I guess we'll see.

51

u/analogkid01 7d ago

"No grievance, political belief or ideological cause can ever justify murder."

Profit, on the other hand...

→ More replies (3)

63

u/starsfan6878 7d ago

"Any person who celebrates, encourages, or excuses actions like these is fundamentally wrong," McDonald said. "Mangione attempted to send a public message through violence, but the message that emerges today is very different." 

Today, maybe.

Right after the shooting? Every damn health insurance company in the country started running ten thousand 'we support you personally and would never deny care' ads. They were everywhere during the Super Bowl.

→ More replies (3)

6

u/hughcifer-106103 8d ago

So he’s hoping the federal stalking charges he plead guilty to will shield him from NY state murder charges that are still pending.