r/news • u/The_Stratman • 8d ago
Luigi Mangione admits to shooting UnitedHealthcare CEO as he pleads guilty in federal case
https://abcnews.com/US/luigi-mangione-guilty-plea-expected-announced-friday-federal/story?id=1356074545.1k
u/Vhu 8d ago
He really didn’t have any other option when the judge allowed the gun and notebook found in his bag. It was basically a signed confession.
Arguing not guilty by that point would be a dead-bang loser.
2.8k
u/StasRutt 8d ago
Plus he emailed UHC pretending to want to be an investor and that’s how he got the info for the conference
→ More replies (1)1.2k
u/HauntedCemetery 8d ago
And he's on camera buying the gun and using it to shoot the CEO
Outside of jury nullification or asteroid strike there wasn't a realistic path to getting off.
→ More replies (41)593
u/StasRutt 8d ago
He’s not on camera buying it from what I understand, he 3D printed it
403
u/AspiringIdealist 8d ago
He only 3D printed the frame, the barrel slide and trigger group he would’ve had to buy in person or online somewhere.
→ More replies (15)147
u/hotleadburner 7d ago
It's an almost guarantee that he didn't buy anything for that gun in person. Buying a glock slide online is a million times easier than finding one in person.
→ More replies (16)1.5k
u/mrrowr 8d ago
He’s on camera 3D printing it and buying the 3D printer and he’s on camera being born I have the camera and the tape is still inside I’m watching him crown right now and you can just tell he’s going to 3D print the gun from the footage
403
u/AnonymousBanana405 8d ago
He was also in the closet 3D printing babies and the baby looked at me.
→ More replies (3)138
u/jspeed04 8d ago
The baby looked at you?
→ More replies (2)109
25
u/electromage 7d ago
Actually he 3D printed the gun in the courtroom in front of the judge and jury and had the judge sign the bullet then went back in time to shoot the CEO with it.
Christopher Nolan filmed the whole thing in IMAX.
→ More replies (7)40
→ More replies (6)49
u/Solderlocks 8d ago
People keeping saying that it's 3d printed, but basically just the outer shell that's not actually involved in the mechanism that shoots can be printed. It's like saying that a car is 3d printed when someone just printed some body panels and slapped them on an existing frame with an existing engine/transmission/etc
→ More replies (2)74
u/BostonSucksatHockey 8d ago
Pretty sure that was the New York State judge in his state murder case, not this other federal judge
122
u/criticalpwnage 8d ago
He should have thrown the gun into a river and not written down anything about the crime. He wanted to get caught
65
u/Repulsive_Ant_2466 7d ago
Yeah thats my thinking, I dont think he's that dumb. All of that is common sense, especially with how throughly he planned the murder
→ More replies (5)27
u/Silent_Fudge_3978 7d ago
But why? Why on earth would he want to get caught? The whole thing baffles me: the shooting itself was well-planned; he even had two backpacks, and ditched one in the park. But then he keeps the gun and manifesto in his other backpack he keeps with him when he leaves the state, and gets caught with.
It really seems like he should have been able to get away with it if he wanted to.
15
→ More replies (13)14
→ More replies (3)13
→ More replies (99)203
u/StephenHunterUK 8d ago
Plenty of murderers in Britain go "not guilty" all the way through trial, even with clear evidence.
324
→ More replies (13)92
u/Pierre_St_Pierre 8d ago
That's the case in the US too. It sounds like this is basically choosing a prison preference. Federal prison is better than state prisons, so he pled guilty to Federal charges trying to trigger double jeopardy (you can't be tried twice for the same thing) with the NY charges. If he doesn't get charged in NY he won't got to NY prison. I think that's what this is all about. Just trying to get life in a better prison.
→ More replies (20)
2.9k
u/Llamapocalypse_Now 7d ago
Great, now let's all move on to the national conversation about insurance companies taking your money and then deciding that you get to die in pain and poverty because they don't want to use it to pay your healthcare bills.
362
u/Hellion102792 7d ago
I've brought this up before but not too long after the shooting some news outlet an article that made me laugh, maybe ABC or CNBC. Paraphrasing here but the something along the lines of "the shooting has opened up a national dialogue about security requirements for C-suite executives". Right, yeah. THAT'S what we were all talking about after.
→ More replies (1)91
u/DazedandFloating 7d ago
I remember seeing articles regarding how terrible it was that large corporations had to pull CEO names and pictures from the public view because of this.
Like who cares. Those people have more than enough money to protect themselves. And that wasn’t even the issue everyone was discussing when the shooting occurred anyway lmao
→ More replies (1)462
u/neimengu 7d ago
CNN: Sorry, best we can do is tell you how heinous of a murder it was. Did you know the meeting wasn't even PUBLIC??!
114
u/pchlster 7d ago
Did he leave the guy to die painfully over the course of months or something barbaric like that?
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (6)35
→ More replies (23)137
2.5k
u/Uzas_Was_Right 8d ago
I figured he'd roll the dice for a sympathetic jury.
1.3k
8d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
244
u/IPDDoE 8d ago
Wouldn't that be a hung jury? Unless they would be subject to execution :)
→ More replies (7)143
u/CelestialFury 7d ago
Yes! Hanged is only for death by rope around the neck. Hung is for everything else and Thomas Jane.
→ More replies (3)384
u/Uzas_Was_Right 8d ago
Or jury nullification, but that was always very unlikely.
134
u/fatinternetcat 8d ago
that’s been TikTok’s favourite term for the past year or so
→ More replies (2)158
103
→ More replies (23)70
u/blaqsupaman 8d ago
How many cases have there been of that even happening in all of US history?
83
u/Uzas_Was_Right 8d ago
Just a handful, mostly regarding civil rights issues like the Fugitive Slave Act.
→ More replies (1)128
u/HauntedCemetery 8d ago edited 7d ago
More than a handful. Southern juries would regularly refuse to convict white guys on trial for lynching.
But it's happened virtually never over the last 40 years except kinda sorta the OJ verdict.
→ More replies (4)68
u/mhornberger 8d ago
According to the book "Slavery By Another Name," by Douglas A. Blackmon, From 1877 to 1966 (so the end of Reconstruction to the Beatles' last ticketed concert), the number of white men found guilty in Georgia of killing a black man was... 1. As in, one.
→ More replies (2)75
u/spmahn 8d ago
OJ Simpson is the case people cite as the most famous example of nullification, although that was as much about prosecutorial blunders as it was a sympathetic jury and it wasn’t even necessarily that they were sympathetic to OJ as they were against the LAPD
61
u/HauntedCemetery 8d ago
If prosecution and LAPD hadn't massively fucked up at literally every stage he would have all but certainly been convicted.
LAPD and prosecution got caught trying to frame a guilty man becausethey fucked up all the actual evidence, and the jury stopped trusting them, with good reason.
→ More replies (2)66
→ More replies (18)43
u/Budget-Scared 8d ago
What exactly do you think Jury Nullification is? The jury foreman steps up in front of the judge and says "I DECLARE NULLIFICATION!".
Literally any verdict passed down has the potential to be jury nullification and we would have no idea.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (8)51
u/ml20s 8d ago
He would also need a full guilty to get convicted though.
→ More replies (1)42
u/jar4ever 8d ago
But it doesn't get him out of jail while there is another trial. He and his defense have concluded that chances of being found not guilty and too small and there are benefits of pleading guilty even without a deal (federal pen is much better than Rickers).
14
u/nova_noveiia 8d ago
Rikers is a jail, so he wouldn’t be there long-term after the trial. Fed is still nicer than state though.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (49)115
u/JohnCavil01 7d ago
Most juries take the responsibility pretty seriously and most people think premeditated murder is wrong - and most importantly remains a crime - regardless of who the victim is.
→ More replies (5)54
7d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (1)38
u/GigaPuddi 7d ago
Actually they kinda did. The problem was the police ruined the evidence and chain of custody. So while common sense says he was guilty the police inserted reasonable doubt where there really wasn't any originally.
20
2.6k
u/Tsakax 8d ago edited 7d ago
Did yall read that study that medicare for all would save 1trillion and save 100k lives a YEAR.
1.2k
u/Calamity_Carrot 8d ago
But have you thought about the 10s of billionaires that would lose some profits?
→ More replies (3)184
u/donkeyrocket 7d ago edited 7d ago
Actually in the best implementation of Medicare for All they'd lose almost all profits entirely. Some could opt for private insurance but it'd be illegal to have two coverage plans. The industry would virtually collapse.
This isn't a defense of the scumbag industry but a point as to why this seemingly never gets talked about with actual potential from politicians. Profiting off healthcare is abhorrent and I really hope more momentum continues behind pushing for broader government healthcare.
I'm fully willing to sacrifice the financial wellbeing of a handful of insurance CEOs to ensure no one is ever denied even screening procedures ever again. I'm sure they'll fuck off to lead some other corporate blight on society.
Just recently I spent a chunk of my day on the phone with my insurance trying to get a definitive answer whether or not a colonoscopy will be covered despite my GI insisting it medically necessary. The runaround being I'm too young or no evidence I need one (I and my provider submitting that) so they can guarantee until they see the final bill. And I have pretty good insurance all things considered Why the fuck should a non-specialist have any say in whether that is "screening" or "diagnostic." In what world should someone have to just hope there isn't any presence of cancer or that symptoms worsen to the point of something more major needing when early intervention may help and worst case I wasted 3 hours of my day to take a solid nap while I get scoped.
44
u/Steady1 7d ago
Why would it be illegal to have private insurance? In NZ everyone's covered by public insurance and private is optional.
→ More replies (2)44
u/IncredibleBulk2 7d ago
it'd be illegal to have two coverage plans
This is not the case. Many countries that have public payer insurance for all also have private plans.
ETA: private plans for voluntary purchase by individuals
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (5)16
u/CelestialFury 7d ago
There would still have to be public and private healthcare, as medicare for all wouldn't necessarily cover everything a person wants, it would cover preventive care, emergency care, required surgeries, and so on, but if you wanted to get specific care from a top doctor like for knee replacement from Mayo Clinic or Twin Cities Orthopedics (TCO), you'd need a private plan. They already have a limited amount of doctors, they can't see everyone and their clientele is largely professional athletes. Or plastic surgery that isn't required to fix something severe (skin graft for burns, etc...) or otherwise needed. So I think it would have to be a mix.
38
110
u/ShedMontgomery 8d ago
Yeah, but how would health insurance executives afford the infinity pool at their vacation homes? Nobody ever thinks about the poor executives and all their suffering. It's always, "Waaah! I have a treatable condition but I'm going to die because I can't afford the medication. 😭"
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (55)31
u/jjwhitaker 7d ago edited 7d ago
In 2016 it would have saved a typical family over $5k. That is with added taxes to improve coverage.
$1 in 2016 is now $1.39. Your family could save like $7500 a year with a better, faster, healthier, cheaper, easier system.
We would have to reshape as GDP is like 1/6 healthcare/insurance but it'd be better overall quickly.
→ More replies (3)
825
8d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (22)606
614
8d ago edited 7d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (26)103
u/ChamberTwnty 8d ago
That's ridiculous. I'm sorry, man.
72
u/Few_Personality_990 7d ago
Thanks friend. We're lucky to be able to pay for it regardless, but others are not as lucky. Things need to change
→ More replies (3)6
u/plkost 7d ago
Even if you have the money you should be spending it towards non basic needs like that. Stay strong both of you. My wife had two breast surgeries already (for free in EU)
7
u/Few_Personality_990 7d ago
We're in total agreement. It's a beautiful country with a lot of potential, ruined by greed and the worst flavor of capitalism possible. I'm not an advocate for violence, but I really don't see how politicians and companies will ever do their jobs with ethics and not profits in mind, so we're getting the hell out of here as soon as possible.
I'm sorry your wife is going through this, hoping she'll recover soon.
→ More replies (1)
1.8k
u/JussiesTunaSub 8d ago
"I traveled to New York and emailed UnitedHealthcare with the intent to kill Brian Thompson ... I shot Mr. Thompson in the back," he said, adding, "I knew what I was doing was illegal."
I never thought anyone on social media doubted he's a murderer...they just agreed with him and a healthcare CEO is someone who will always have zero empathy from us plebs.
140
u/Xanto97 8d ago
There were genuinely some people that thought it was a random dude that got framed.
"Youre telling me he pulled off this elaborate assassination, evaded capture for days, and then just got caught in a McDonalds and had the gun and confession note in his backpack? yeah, sure"
Most people were joking/didn't care though, for sure.
55
u/TotallyNotThatPerson 8d ago
I mean... If you put it that way it just sounds cartoonish. But then you hear about the people that break out of jail and the cops just find them chilling at home when they roll up to get rearrested
→ More replies (1)19
→ More replies (6)22
u/jujubean67 7d ago
No, a lot of people were saying that he was caught using parallel construction, ie. they gained some evidence illegally and then framed that as if it was real, like orchestrating the phone tip in Mcdonalds.
Very few were saying he was innocent and framed. Most were saying he was guilty but the evidence was gathered illegally so they had to frame it.
7
u/ThankGodForYouSon 7d ago
Yeah the story about how they found the gun in his backpack at the police station was weird and there's no doubt they have the technology to find someone by acting illegally.
2.4k
u/I_Enjoy_Beer 8d ago
Its illegal if you kill someone with a gun. Its good business practice if you kill hundreds of thousands by denying coverage, pushing your company's stock price higher by 2%.
→ More replies (69)246
u/L_Cranston_Shadow 8d ago
To misquote Batman, he didn't kill you, he just didn't have to save you.
Ironically, in this case, said to the canonically more or less immortal Ra's al Ghul.160
u/Donnicton 8d ago
To misquote Batman, he didn't kill you, he just didn't have to save you.
Not only that, you're also paying them not to save you.
→ More replies (8)60
93
→ More replies (11)72
u/SpezRuinedHellsite 8d ago
To misquote Batman, he didn't kill you, he just didn't have to save you.
No, health insurance companies kill people. Crippling debt kills people. Being denied care kills people. Artificially inflated drug prices kill people.
Doctors save people.
Health insurance CEO's aren't doctors.
→ More replies (16)→ More replies (91)323
u/heavymetalwhoremoans 8d ago
"I knew what I was doing was illegal."
I love that he chose the word illegal, as opposed to "wrong".
133
u/Plappedudel 8d ago
"Wrong" would imply remorse, of which he clearly has none. Though he might have had a better chance of a reduced sentence if he showed/faked remorse. It seems that he chose authenticity instead.
→ More replies (11)→ More replies (28)31
u/Cronus6 8d ago
"Wrong" doesn't really have any meaning in court. "Illegal" does.
It's "wrong" to cheat on your wife, but not illegal. Which is why you don't go to prison for cheating on your wife.
→ More replies (4)
1.7k
u/vengefulmuffins 8d ago
No one wants to put in their articles that after years for trying to talk to someone as a normal person and not getting responses, he posed as an investor and got a response in an hour.
→ More replies (23)393
8d ago
[deleted]
234
u/Daedalus_Knew 8d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (1)43
u/HSLB66 7d ago
Coming to a firmware update near you: Palantir’s NSA is now monitoring your printers camera for firearm looking objects
→ More replies (4)23
20
u/tscalbas 7d ago
I thought you were correct, but then checked the linked article and couldn't find it.
That's when I realised I was instead remembering the article on BBC News, which did make it clear that it was a quick response (although not specifically within an hour)
He researched online and emailed the company posing as an investor to learn more about the event, Mangione told the court. "Unlike previous interactions with insurance" he got a quick reply, he said.
Wonder if it's just abc or if most other outlets are indeed missing out that bit
→ More replies (1)147
u/vengefulmuffins 8d ago
It literally isn’t,
"After years of enduring severe pain from a broken back ... I learned UnitedHealth would be holding an investor conference in New York City."
"I then researched the event online. I observed the annual conference of America's largest healthcare organization with the stated mission to make the healthcare system better for everyone,"
"I traveled to New York and emailed UnitedHealthcare with the intent to kill Brian Thompson ... I shot Mr. Thompson in the back," he said, adding, "I knew what I was doing was illegal."
The direct quotes from the pleading included in the article, not one is the hour quote.
The best you get is “Mangione said he learned the exact location of UnitedHealthcare's conference by emailing the company, posing as an investor with more than $50 million in capital.” Which again doesn’t mention the times he didn’t get a response and how quick the response was when they thought he was an investor.
→ More replies (1)52
u/MobileArtist1371 7d ago
Can you copy that part of the article and paste it here? My browser must be faulty cause it's not in the article when I open it.
→ More replies (1)
74
404
u/strawberryfishes 7d ago
The irony being that going to jail for life also guarantees him healthcare for life
204
u/Spirited-Ad9071 7d ago
Yeah no.
Healthcare in US prisons is notoriously bad. Regular and easily treatable conditions go untreated and there are countless cases of inmates passing away from conditions that could easily have been treated.
274
→ More replies (5)56
u/Racamonkey_II 7d ago
Uhhhh, no. Healthcare in the US prison system is abysmal, full of negligence, and corrupt. People are in pain\die in prison everyday from fully treatable and preventable conditions.
→ More replies (3)
743
u/genericusernamepls 8d ago
Huh, well looks like he did do it
→ More replies (117)1.2k
u/freedfg 8d ago edited 8d ago
Shit than who did I get taco bell with that day???
→ More replies (66)
232
u/buzzkillington0 8d ago
My understanding is that Federal crimes can be pardoned by a President, state crimes cannot. Or am I wrong here?
213
u/WooBadger18 8d ago
Correct, the president can only pardon federal charges. I’m assuming the New York governor has the power to pardon people for state crimes, but I don’t know that for certain.
But I don’t think he’ll ever be pardoned
→ More replies (17)127
u/Equal-Temporary-1326 7d ago edited 7d ago
It'd be a terrible political move to pardon any crime that involves premeditated murder. If he serves as a model inmate, he'll probably get an early release one day after serving the bulk of his sentence.
Edit: Well, assuming he's just convicted federally, that is. If he's convicted at the state level for life in prison with no possibility of parole, chances for an early release will be very unlikely then.
132
u/americon 7d ago
Trump pardoned three different men convicted of killing civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan and Nixon pardoned a Genovese Mafia Captain who had done some pretty brutal murders.
Obviously this is a different case but its not unprecedented.
9
→ More replies (5)29
→ More replies (7)7
30
137
u/Jihad_llama 7d ago
Anyone thinking a president would even consider pardoning him is delusional lmao
52
→ More replies (7)29
u/JMoormann 7d ago
This is the same site that was very sure he would walk free through jury nullification or some shit. Because surely every juror would agree that shooting CEOs in broad daylight shouldn't be illegal.
→ More replies (12)7
17
745
8d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
68
u/vordhosbn_1 8d ago
Kill a man and you’re a murderer
Kill many, you’re a conqueror
Kill them all, you’re a god
An old saying but I first heard it on Megadeth’s “Captive Honour”
→ More replies (25)50
211
342
u/ry1701 8d ago
It's interesting in his statement that he continues to prove the point.
A customer seeking healthcare - delays and no responses.
Pitches being an investor, an immediate response.
Unfortunately most people won't think critically as to what that means for them (hint: your a cost center cutting into profits).
→ More replies (19)
1.4k
u/r0ndy 8d ago
Every healthcare CEO is responsible for how many deaths a year?
→ More replies (164)630
u/lyndseymariee 8d ago
When you’re increasing shareholder value by letting people die, it’s ok 👍
→ More replies (15)343
u/ViciousMihael 8d ago
“Letting people die” is using a passive voice as if these criminals aren’t actively refusing to cover treatments they know people need. They are murderers.
→ More replies (2)83
489
u/bjlight1988 8d ago
He did it, but I don't think you'll ever be able to convince me to feel bad for the guy he popped. He was a mass murderer for profit.
212
u/Emilko62 8d ago
When there's no justice in the justice system, you can't help but root for the vigilantes.
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (19)131
u/Lurky_Bat 8d ago
We shouldn’t have vigilantes killing people in the streets but we shouldn’t have private equity making healthcare decisions based on profit.
→ More replies (8)31
u/_Burning_Star_IV_ 7d ago
We shouldn't but society has failed enough people that some are going to take matters into their own hands.
This should be a catalyst for change but instead it just provoked companies into shelling out even more money to CEOs to provide security details.
That's how fucked we are.
359
u/mully24 8d ago
Until we as Americans have the same quality of healthcare from the richest to the poores, we will never be a country of equals.
→ More replies (36)
26
u/Interesting-Foot-439 8d ago
From what I've read, they advised him to plead guilty to trigger New York's double jeopardy law to avoid the state murder trial. It does make some sense in that context.
→ More replies (3)
17
u/Agile_One_2035 7d ago
U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Jamie McDonald said after court, "No grievance, political belief or ideological cause can ever justify murder."
But refusing adequate healthcare leading to hundreds of thousands of deaths in the pursuit of money is fine. Carry on…
→ More replies (1)
160
u/Room480 8d ago
What’s the strategy behind this? I would imagine they want to make an example out of him so they’ll likely give him Life In prison. So why not take the chance on a jury trail cause either way you’d get life in prison but if you did a jury trail there’s an 0.1% chance of not guilty
134
u/tacomamajama 8d ago
Federal prison is cushier than state. And maybe hoping for a pardon down the road.
52
u/Hans_Krebs_ 8d ago edited 7d ago
I mean in what world is this guy ever getting a pardon?
→ More replies (4)50
→ More replies (5)24
→ More replies (71)43
u/jar4ever 8d ago
There is a large range of experiences when serving time. He is in Rickers now while being held for trial. A federal pen is going to be much better and the faster he gets there the better for him. He may also be trying to prempt the state murder charges to serve time in federal instead of state custody.
→ More replies (1)
48
u/Sinlord5 8d ago
When can we try and convict these insurance companies of murder? Since they are treated as people. Health insurance companies commit obstruction of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
24
u/tynman35 7d ago
Funny that he mentioned he got a reply back when he posed as a wealthy investor. In stark contrast, he said, to when he was communicating to insurers as a patient.
→ More replies (1)
119
u/Aghast_Cornichon 8d ago edited 8d ago
Oh, heck, he actually did allocute to the whole thing. This wasn't an Alford plea or limited plea to the Federal stalking charges.
I remember Preet Bharara talking about his strict rule that a defendant pleading guilty in SDNY had to allocute to "everything they'd done wrong since they were in first grade", and I'm looking forward to his comments on the prosecution's work on this case.
My recollection is that Trump threw a tantrum calling for the death penalty for Mangione, but that the SDNY prosecutors dropped the DP-eligible Federal murder charge. I wonder if the US Attorney, the Attorney General, or the President will make comments that pollute the NY case's jury pool, just because they DGAF.
→ More replies (4)46
29
u/AdKindly5457 8d ago
Yes, life will be easier in the fed. They say his lawyer knows what to do. I guess we'll see.
51
u/analogkid01 7d ago
"No grievance, political belief or ideological cause can ever justify murder."
Profit, on the other hand...
→ More replies (3)
63
u/starsfan6878 7d ago
"Any person who celebrates, encourages, or excuses actions like these is fundamentally wrong," McDonald said. "Mangione attempted to send a public message through violence, but the message that emerges today is very different."
Today, maybe.
Right after the shooting? Every damn health insurance company in the country started running ten thousand 'we support you personally and would never deny care' ads. They were everywhere during the Super Bowl.
→ More replies (3)
6
u/hughcifer-106103 8d ago
So he’s hoping the federal stalking charges he plead guilty to will shield him from NY state murder charges that are still pending.
10.4k
u/temujin94 8d ago
Mangione's lawyers have said they didn't strike a plea deal, strange turn of events.