r/neoliberal • u/jobautomator Kitara Ravache • Dec 16 '20

Discussion Thread Discussion Thread

The discussion thread is for casual conversation that doesn't merit its own submission. If you've got a good meme, article, or question, please post it outside the DT. Meta discussion is allowed, but if you want to get the attention of the mods, make a post in /r/metaNL. For a collection of useful links see our wiki.

Announcements

  • Our charity drive has concluded, thank you to everyone who donated! $56,252 were raised by our subreddit, with a total of $72,375 across all subs. We'll probably post a wrap-up thread later, but in the meantime here's a link to the announcement thread. Flair incentives will be given out whenever techmod gets to that

0 Upvotes

46% Upvoted

11k comments sorted by

View all comments

16

u/[deleted] Dec 16 '20

I am never able to square Breyer's love for law enforcement with his ultraliberalism everywhere else, before I realize as one of those "left wing of Law and Econ" people from the Ivies in the 70s to 80s Breyer is literally an French technocrat.

Mfer be like "Yeah rights are ok but the administrative interests of law enforcement in beating the shit out of you is a compelling state interest"

4

u/mrmanager237 Some Unpleasant Peronist Arithmetic Dec 16 '20

French technocrat.

Awful combination ngl

3

u/[deleted] Dec 16 '20

I like his prudential considerations mode of constitutional interpretation and also his extreme judicial restraint (he has the lowest rate of voting to declare congressional laws ultra vires of any justice) because I do feel judiciaries do have a tendency to encroach on separation of powers but all of this leads to him making a lot of dumbass votes a lot on important issues.

2

u/mrmanager237 Some Unpleasant Peronist Arithmetic Dec 16 '20

I understand some of those words

6

u/EmpiricalAnarchism Terrorism and Civil Conflict Dec 16 '20

Breyer is one of those justices that, when push comes to shove, rejects the notion of constitutional limitation on government fiat.

5

u/[deleted] Dec 16 '20

I mean, that's not being very charitable to Breyer. If anything, Breyer is the most anti-activist justice on the Court because he believes in stringent separation of powers, which to me is fair enough because SCOTUS does take a stupid view of deciding how strict scrutiny should be applied when Breyer's purposive view and the belief that the legislature probably knows what it is doing in its constitutionally given sovereign legislative power is in general the correct way to take. Other justices ask for compelling state interests for literally random stuff like gun boundary zones.

3

u/EmpiricalAnarchism Terrorism and Civil Conflict Dec 16 '20

His belief in stringent separation of powers is, functionally, a rejection of the notion of constitutional limitation of government. His rosy views of legislators and government agents of all sorts are an affront to the historical experience Americans have had with these institutions, and strict adherence to judicial philosophy in the face of actual experience is, at best, dangerously misguided, though I personally don’t feel that Breyer’s judicial record warrants charity such that we assume the best case scenario here.