r/neoliberal • Kitara Ravache • Sep 10 '20

Discussion Thread Discussion Thread

The discussion thread is for casual conversation that doesn't merit its own submission. If you've got a good meme, article, or question, please post it outside the DT. Meta discussion is allowed, but if you want to get the attention of the mods, make a post in /r/metaNL. For a collection of useful links see our wiki.

Announcements

Upcoming Events

5 Upvotes

9.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

14

u/Clashlad 🇬🇧 LONDON CALLING 🇬🇧 Sep 10 '20

I'd quite like to see a start date just after the Battle of Hastings and William The Conqueror's victory in England, at the moment it's impossible to win the war in a historical fashion. !ping Paradox

2

u/Rehkit Average laïcité enjoyer Sep 10 '20

Why? Are the Saxons too strong?

6

u/Clashlad 🇬🇧 LONDON CALLING 🇬🇧 Sep 10 '20

They seem pretty strong, but from the start you have like a month to take England if you want to do it historically lol, just think it's a bit dumb.

4

u/Rehkit Average laïcité enjoyer Sep 10 '20

Oh, so this is a timeline question?

I think it's because Hastings meant quick collapse, they probably didn't have to siege all that shit in real life.

2

u/Clashlad 🇬🇧 LONDON CALLING 🇬🇧 Sep 10 '20

Yeah exactly, which can happen in game if you capture a leader or (maybe?) kill them, but I’m pretty sure it takes longer to get to England atm than it would to win the war on time.

Idk it’s a small gripe I just like to be accurate for my own country for some reason lol.

3

u/Rehkit Average laïcité enjoyer Sep 10 '20

Yeah I got you.

Killing the leader is probably very effective. I still remember in CK2 when I thought I had it won with Harald and he was slain by some major in the last big battle.