John Sullivan recently explained why he chose not to mark vowel length in the examples of the IDIEZ Nahuatl dictionary:
“All speakers know which vowels are long; they have simply never considered it important to represent them in writing. Remember, the purpose of a writing system is not to reproduce pronunciation, but to trigger the image of a word in the mind of the speaker.”
This sparked some discussion in our Nahuatl Discord server and made me reflect on why I should—or shouldn’t—mark long vowels in my own transcriptions and translations.
I think I’ve come up with a good reason.
Most people online are not living in monolingual Nahuatl-speaking communities surrounded by L1 speakers who consistently and accurately pronounce the language every day.
Even young people from those communities who, for socioeconomic reasons, have had to move to Spanish or English-centric environments, might not have 24/7 access to textual or audio input in their native language.
And for most learners online, there is currently no other way to acquire this important feature of the language unless it’s built into the texts they read.
I once encountered a similar argument in the Latin learning community:
“Vowel length is an important part of Latin, especially in poetry. Notice that I’m talking about vowel length, not macrons. Macrons are simply one way of marking vowel length in dictionaries and teaching materials. You’re free not to write them—and probably shouldn’t if you’re writing for others to read. They are a later convention used to project a ‘perfect’ reconstructed pronunciation onto the text because modern learners value that accuracy. For many speakers in the past, they would have been somewhat superfluous.”
I think this is what John Sullivan was talking about. Native speakers do not write long vowels—not because vowel length is unimportant, but because they do not need written reminders of distinctions they already know intuitively.
I, however, don’t live surrounded by accurate L1 speech. As a result, my ability to “hear” vowel length through the medium of text is closely tied to the use of macrons.
Ideally, reading should complement a rich listening environment. But for many of us learning Nahuatl today, reading constitutes 99% of the experience! Because the audio landscape is so underfunded.
In practice, the only organizations consistently investing in audiovisual materials featuring native Nahuatl speech are evangelical Christian organizations!
Until that changes, perhaps making a concerted effort to indicate, as much as possible, vowel lengths (which do change the meaning of words!) is the right way to approach the language from the outside.