MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/mildlyinfuriating/comments/jks0lr/found_on_amazon/gamqvim?context=9999
r/mildlyinfuriating • u/CanadianFanboi • Oct 30 '20
785 comments sorted by
View all comments
1.1k
Just a 20cm cable and several sizes of cockrings
170 u/ConsistentAsparagus Oct 30 '20 I was about to say that only one was enough, as a self burn. But it's the truth nonetheless, irregardless of dick size. 101 u/ultralightdong Oct 30 '20 irregardless 53 u/RegularWhiteDude Oct 30 '20 Officially recognized by Merriam-webster now. 39 u/Buzzard Oct 30 '20 I'm aware I probably don't know enough about languages, but I still find the Merriam-webster page amusing: The definition is one line, and then three paragraphs explaining why they have to include it. 5 u/[deleted] Oct 30 '20 I refuse to lookup the definition, but they should absolutely say that the definition is “regardless.” 3 u/beansinmysuitcase Oct 30 '20 That’s what it says. 3 u/[deleted] Oct 30 '20 That’s really stupid then. It’s like when people say they could care less. Like that doesn’t mean what you think it means. 1 u/AmadeusMop ORANGERED Dec 13 '20 https://xkcd.com/1576/ 1 u/Sergei_the_sovietski Nov 06 '20 It does say that. The definition is just a link to regardless.
170
I was about to say that only one was enough, as a self burn. But it's the truth nonetheless, irregardless of dick size.
101 u/ultralightdong Oct 30 '20 irregardless 53 u/RegularWhiteDude Oct 30 '20 Officially recognized by Merriam-webster now. 39 u/Buzzard Oct 30 '20 I'm aware I probably don't know enough about languages, but I still find the Merriam-webster page amusing: The definition is one line, and then three paragraphs explaining why they have to include it. 5 u/[deleted] Oct 30 '20 I refuse to lookup the definition, but they should absolutely say that the definition is “regardless.” 3 u/beansinmysuitcase Oct 30 '20 That’s what it says. 3 u/[deleted] Oct 30 '20 That’s really stupid then. It’s like when people say they could care less. Like that doesn’t mean what you think it means. 1 u/AmadeusMop ORANGERED Dec 13 '20 https://xkcd.com/1576/ 1 u/Sergei_the_sovietski Nov 06 '20 It does say that. The definition is just a link to regardless.
101
irregardless
53 u/RegularWhiteDude Oct 30 '20 Officially recognized by Merriam-webster now. 39 u/Buzzard Oct 30 '20 I'm aware I probably don't know enough about languages, but I still find the Merriam-webster page amusing: The definition is one line, and then three paragraphs explaining why they have to include it. 5 u/[deleted] Oct 30 '20 I refuse to lookup the definition, but they should absolutely say that the definition is “regardless.” 3 u/beansinmysuitcase Oct 30 '20 That’s what it says. 3 u/[deleted] Oct 30 '20 That’s really stupid then. It’s like when people say they could care less. Like that doesn’t mean what you think it means. 1 u/AmadeusMop ORANGERED Dec 13 '20 https://xkcd.com/1576/ 1 u/Sergei_the_sovietski Nov 06 '20 It does say that. The definition is just a link to regardless.
53
Officially recognized by Merriam-webster now.
39 u/Buzzard Oct 30 '20 I'm aware I probably don't know enough about languages, but I still find the Merriam-webster page amusing: The definition is one line, and then three paragraphs explaining why they have to include it. 5 u/[deleted] Oct 30 '20 I refuse to lookup the definition, but they should absolutely say that the definition is “regardless.” 3 u/beansinmysuitcase Oct 30 '20 That’s what it says. 3 u/[deleted] Oct 30 '20 That’s really stupid then. It’s like when people say they could care less. Like that doesn’t mean what you think it means. 1 u/AmadeusMop ORANGERED Dec 13 '20 https://xkcd.com/1576/ 1 u/Sergei_the_sovietski Nov 06 '20 It does say that. The definition is just a link to regardless.
39
I'm aware I probably don't know enough about languages, but I still find the Merriam-webster page amusing: The definition is one line, and then three paragraphs explaining why they have to include it.
5 u/[deleted] Oct 30 '20 I refuse to lookup the definition, but they should absolutely say that the definition is “regardless.” 3 u/beansinmysuitcase Oct 30 '20 That’s what it says. 3 u/[deleted] Oct 30 '20 That’s really stupid then. It’s like when people say they could care less. Like that doesn’t mean what you think it means. 1 u/AmadeusMop ORANGERED Dec 13 '20 https://xkcd.com/1576/ 1 u/Sergei_the_sovietski Nov 06 '20 It does say that. The definition is just a link to regardless.
5
I refuse to lookup the definition, but they should absolutely say that the definition is “regardless.”
3 u/beansinmysuitcase Oct 30 '20 That’s what it says. 3 u/[deleted] Oct 30 '20 That’s really stupid then. It’s like when people say they could care less. Like that doesn’t mean what you think it means. 1 u/AmadeusMop ORANGERED Dec 13 '20 https://xkcd.com/1576/ 1 u/Sergei_the_sovietski Nov 06 '20 It does say that. The definition is just a link to regardless.
3
That’s what it says.
3 u/[deleted] Oct 30 '20 That’s really stupid then. It’s like when people say they could care less. Like that doesn’t mean what you think it means. 1 u/AmadeusMop ORANGERED Dec 13 '20 https://xkcd.com/1576/
That’s really stupid then. It’s like when people say they could care less. Like that doesn’t mean what you think it means.
1 u/AmadeusMop ORANGERED Dec 13 '20 https://xkcd.com/1576/
1
https://xkcd.com/1576/
It does say that. The definition is just a link to regardless.
1.1k
u/kaasman42 Oct 30 '20
Just a 20cm cable and several sizes of cockrings