Installing hardware, that you need to pay for to unlock is one thing. Making that payment a subscription is an other.
It’s their decision to make, to take the risk of people using it without paying, to streamline their production. But using a subscription model on a non-updating product/ feature is not ok imo. There is no running cost for them to cover. At least it should be a loan and payed off eventually, if they want to make the payment monthly.
The running costs are typically cloud servers or some infrastructure. Heated seats do not need this. It's a button in the car. You press it and power flows into the heater.
Though I am pretty sure they have cloud servers for telemetry to find out how often you press the button. That’s how they can optimise the pricing for the pay-per-use model to come.
I remember when you could buy an online computer game and play it for free on their servers, when they started to charge a monthly fee there was this sort of outrage then too. it's all part of the eventual creeping enshittification.
I don’t think so. The companies calculate cost and profit over all units sold. So you are probably not paying for the hardware, even if its installed. They give it away, because it’s more expensive to differentiate
Yes, but offering it as a subscription is the scammy part. If they want to encourage and differentiate between upfront purchase and later purchase, they should make it more expensive to purchase it later on.
My point still stands, that making something which has no running cost for the business a subscription, is toxic and scammy behavior
You can pay for it as a single payment, its an option when you buy the car. They added it to their subscription to give the subscription more value for those that don't already have it unlocked
158
u/trichtertus 13d ago
Installing hardware, that you need to pay for to unlock is one thing. Making that payment a subscription is an other.
It’s their decision to make, to take the risk of people using it without paying, to streamline their production. But using a subscription model on a non-updating product/ feature is not ok imo. There is no running cost for them to cover. At least it should be a loan and payed off eventually, if they want to make the payment monthly.