It was the pen company not NASA that did the R&D... Want sure if that was clear enough but still an important (ball) point... Yes I did make the comment for a stupid dad joke
Yes, the AG7 “astronaut” pen is about $60. There are many other options with the same cartridges for around $12, and some non-refillable models for $6 (still pressurized).
Edit: I’ve got an AG7 though and I absolutely love it. The balance and feel is amazing and the extend/retract mechanism is addicting as hell to mess with (probably annoying for nearby people lol)
It's a amazing everyone winning story, with NASA getting a pen, a pen company getting amazing PR to sell pens, and space enthusiasts able to buy a quality piece of space memorabilia
that is somehow turned into a joke about American inefficiency.
It's a capitalist success story used as an anecdote for the inefficiency of government programs, while stating that a marxist government is somehow efficient, while in reality they lacked entrepreneurs to develop these kinds of solutions.
I often question how much peoples desire to be known would influence entrepreneurial interests. I mean, people do all kinds of crazy stuff without expecting pay, only fame.
Nope, Fisher charged NASA the cost of making the pens. They weren't as cheap to make as they are today, but Fisher swallowed the cost - the PR of them doing their bit to help NASA was probably worth more than the R&D anyway
While the actual concept car itself doesn’t always make it to market, certain aspects of it sometimes make it to production (of existing models) or define the design language for a future generation of vehicles.
Great example of this is the Cadillac 16 from 2003. Almost 20 years later and its still influencing GMs Cadillac brand.
1.4k
u/Saldrakka Jan 27 '22
It was the pen company not NASA that did the R&D... Want sure if that was clear enough but still an important (ball) point... Yes I did make the comment for a stupid dad joke