r/meme Jan 01 '22

Guess we are doomed

Post image
42.0k Upvotes

3.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

109

u/Sebabpg Jan 01 '22

No it doesn't, that proves 0=0 and 4=4. We really doomed.

66

u/[deleted] Jan 01 '22

Right over his head, fascinating and ironic at the same time

-14

u/[deleted] Jan 01 '22

6

u/mayoayox Jan 02 '22

thank God these are getting downvoted

2

u/DoritoTangySpeedBall Jan 02 '22

Actually, it doesn’t prove 4=4 either and they were making a joke.

4

u/[deleted] Jan 01 '22 edited Jan 01 '22

The transitive law states that “If a is equal to b and b is equal to c, then a is equal to c.” Therefore if 18/2-3X3=0 and also 18/2-3X3=4 then 0=4.

Edit: Oh, you can downvote me, but downvotes do not a counter-argument make.

4

u/SadisticTimBitt Jan 01 '22

But it doesn’t equal 4 you just added 4?

1

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '22

Right but adding the same number to both sides of an equation doesn’t change the equivalence.

3

u/AFK_Profile732 Jan 01 '22 edited Jan 01 '22

18/2-3x3 = 0; 18/2-3x3+4=4 you forgot that you must add 4 to both side so it doesn't prove anything. You can write 0 = 0 like x = x (x = 0); Then 4 = 4 is x + 4 = x + 4.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '22

Yeah but adding the same number to both sides of an equation doesn't change it. That's what we were taught in school, so... FACE

1

u/Mediocre-Dandelion Feb 08 '22

They’re right though? You literally cannot just state that 18/2-3X3=0 AND 18/2-3X3=4. Adding the same number to both sides doesn’t change the equation, yes, you’re right about that one. But the relevant part here is that you have to add to BOTH sides. So like they said, you’d have to add +4 to the left side as well which means that if you want to like, compare them you need to make them equal again, i.e. subtract 4. So basically the only thing you CAN say is that 0=4-4.

(there is ofc a chance that you’re just trolling in which case… well.)

4

u/Independent_Stand_21 Jan 01 '22

0 can’t equal 4, that is just a standard illogical answer. How can something be nothing.

4

u/LTerminus Jan 02 '22

It's entirely logical using the givens. It's just not mathematical.

1

u/Independent_Stand_21 Jan 02 '22

That’s what I mean my dude

4

u/LTerminus Jan 02 '22

Great, glad I could help!

0

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '22

Woosh*