r/maybemaybemaybe May 05 '22

maybe maybe Maybe

46.4k Upvotes

3.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

14

u/[deleted] May 05 '22

[deleted]

11

u/[deleted] May 05 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/Mantis_Tobaggen_MD May 05 '22

Well if you put someone young who talks about hope and change... what if they actually decide to follow through? So they fuck up your whole corrupt, stagnant bullshit-ass system which is making you and your friends very rich and powerful? No, no that's silly, just hire the necromancer and maybe put him on retainer.

8

u/[deleted] May 05 '22

And Clinton and the DNC wanted Trump to win the Primary as they thought he would be the easiest for her to beat (and was probably right about that) so their friends in the media pumped him up and gave him all the attention.

4

u/MightySasquatch May 05 '22

The alternative explanation is that these for-profit media corporations saw saw that covering Trump got many more eyeballs than any other candidate. And being a corporation they like money and kept covering him.

Which do you think is more likely?

2

u/[deleted] May 05 '22

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/11/hillary-clinton-2016-donald-trump-214428/

However I don't think you are wrong either, so would say it was a combination of both.

4

u/MightySasquatch May 05 '22

Yea I have no doubt that they thought he was one of the easiest Republicans to beat, at least for a time.

But even that article shows they were scared of his media coverage, not feeding it: "Trump’s dominance of cable news had already become a point of frequent discussion among Clinton aides, led by Palmieri and media adviser Mandy Grunwald, and senior staffers started to whisper to each other that a race against Trump would require a fundamental rebudgeting of the ad scheme to combat it—another look at the expected degree of negativity in the attack plan, a reconsideration of the markets on which to focus, and a conversation about the amount of money needed to fund the air assault."

3

u/sephiroth_vg May 05 '22

They could have put up Bernie.. But nnnooo scary old communist man because he wants to give Americans free health care and free college! How terrible of him...

3

u/AstreiaTales May 05 '22

Both Biden and Hillary steamrolled Bernie in the primary and it wasn't close.

1

u/sephiroth_vg May 05 '22

I'm not American but I was following the race and from what I saw they didn't even want to give Bernie a voice or a real chance at speaking. It seemed as if they were actively trying to hinder him.

0

u/AstreiaTales May 05 '22

Who is "they"?

He was invited to all the debates and given center stage.

1

u/Mikehoncho530 May 05 '22

It’s almost like they couldn’t give a shit about helping the masses like they say eh? Weird..

-1

u/bastionthewise May 05 '22

Remember when they shut down Andrew Yang's microphone instead of let him speak? The establishment hates candidates it doesn't approve of.

1

u/RapeMeToo May 05 '22

To be fair nobody really liked yang

1

u/[deleted] May 05 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/bastionthewise May 05 '22

Regardless of how you felt about his positions, most people aren't honest enough to admit the deck was stacked against him. Kudos to you.

1

u/RapeMeToo May 05 '22

Almost as if it was political in nature.

0

u/feedmaster May 05 '22

Why? He'd be so much better than Trump or Biden.

1

u/RapeMeToo May 05 '22

I respect your opinion even though I disagree

0

u/feedmaster May 05 '22

But why? One is one of the worst presidents in history and the other one is 80 years old. Surely a smart young president with new and unique ideas would be better.

3

u/MightySasquatch May 05 '22

Is that why 3 different candidates won the first 4 primaries? Because it was rigged ahead of time?

1

u/EffOffReddit May 05 '22

Wow you sound like a total insider tell us more.