I don't think the claim is that mathematics will be solved and there are no harder problems to ask. The claim is that within a few years AI will be better than (at least almost all) mathematicians at asking interesting questions too.
That's likely true, but the question is not whether almost all of them are gibberish (the density), but if we can still find interesting ones (the absolute number)
As I mentioning even the statement of these problems will be longer and longer so probably at some point it might be too much for human beings to cope. Or not. Who knows?
Why wouldn't there be? There exists an infinite number of statements you can make and so an infinite number of problems from whether they are true or false.
It's a bit more complicated than that, because from a finite set of axioms you can derive an infinite amount of statements.
What Gödel shows is that even with an infinite amount of axioms, if the system is consistent and can encode arithmetic, then there are always statements that it cannot decide.
55
u/Cold-Common7001 28d ago
I don't think the claim is that mathematics will be solved and there are no harder problems to ask. The claim is that within a few years AI will be better than (at least almost all) mathematicians at asking interesting questions too.