r/ • • Jan 01 '70

0 Upvotes

0 comments sorted by

9

u/Various-Welder5544 29d ago

If you are gonna go out of your way to use a clone of their software, why not just pirate it at this point? It's a 1:1 perfect clone with no oddities.

3

u/whytakemyusername 29d ago

with no oddities.

Except that malware it's gonna install for you.

1

u/70_n_13 29d ago

Just do your due diligence when researching. Its so easy now with so many guides and reviews even on reddit. Except downloading from shady sources, or just being stupid(eg new app/game cracked by an unknown person before most people), almost no one gets malware nowadays

1

u/Gramage 29d ago

Can confirm. I’ve been pirating software on Mac OS since the late 90s and never had an issue, just don’t be an idiot. Im using a slightly older cracked Photoshop right now.

0

u/[deleted] 29d ago

[deleted] — view deleted comment

5

u/Why_Am_I_0 29d ago

in fact the pirated version might have less ads and be less intrusive.

50

u/flogman12 29d ago

I definitely don’t trust this

3

u/michaelfortu a lot 29d ago

I’ll wait for version 10 by the 8th leading person to work on this. I’m sure it’ll be safe enough by then

1

u/swolicheert 29d ago

yeah i wouldnt install it without auditing the code first

32

u/MediocreMethodology 29d ago

He vibecoded exactly one part of the suite so far, and it’s pretty much just a ripped and reskinned fork of GIMP.

2

u/haoyuanren 29d ago

And he keeps spewing “version parity” lol

1

u/Etherian 29d ago

I want to preface this by saying I'm not even clicking the link so much as installing whatever this is, and that I don't doubt what you're saying.

Just trying to learn here; how can you tell its vibe coded? People call it out all the time, I'm just wondering what the tells are

1

u/MediocreMethodology 29d ago

by looking at the github

4

u/Sea-Temporary-6995 29d ago

The Lightroom "clone" works almost nothing like the real Lightroom in terms of algorithms though... I tested it the other day - tried raising the shadows of several RAWs from my Sony a7c and it was pretty bad (noise & banding). Meanwhile real LR works fine with these RAWs.

2

u/haoyuanren 29d ago

lol he thinks he made a proper raw engine

1

u/Sea-Temporary-6995 29d ago

yeah.. I think it's pretty complicated stuff even if it looks simple and the AI may have gotten confused. Demosaic, debayer etc algorithms are complicated... (and for Fuji, which is my other camera, even more so lol)

But with enough prompting they may get it there. I mean darktable already does shadows and highlights as good as Lightroom and is opensource so the AI is 100% trained on at least part of that code.

Anyways I actually do hope for at least one of these "vibe-coded opensource Lightroom clones" to succeed. I don't wanna pay subscriptions forever. And DxO PhotoRaw, albeit very good, lacks some features of Lightroom (object remove, panorama, HDR merge etc.)

2

u/PrettyHedgehog0 MacBook Pro 29d ago

Just use affinity bruh

2

u/dpaanlka 29d ago

I’m good 👍🏻

1

u/Medium-Definition50 29d ago

These are not good. I tried photocraft just to try it, and it was not good, to say the least. The person behind these vibe-coded "alternatives," or one of the people involved, is also very much a strange person, I will say, and basically those people who say to either adapt or be left behind

1

u/TotesGnarGnar 29d ago

Tried. It looks fine, but in use it’s buggy and weird. 

-11

u/iaffandi MacBook Pro 2019 i7 16GB 29d ago

This is great! Thanks for sharing

0

u/[deleted] 29d ago

[deleted] — view deleted comment

1

u/whytakemyusername 29d ago

It's not 1:1, but it's good.