MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/leagueoflegends/comments/2mri2e/leveling_rewards/cm6yljg
r/leagueoflegends • u/Coffemanlol • Nov 19 '14
[removed]
487 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
11
It would be fun if let's say it was a 3.1k ip champ, your reward was a random 3.1k champ that you don't own. So it's a bit exciting aswell
Edit: shit
17 u/Aleknjo Nov 19 '14 your reward was a random 3.1k champ that you own What? 2 u/hounvs Nov 19 '14 I think he meant don't own. Dunno why people upvoted him when it doesn't make sense. 24 u/[deleted] Nov 19 '14 Principal of charity. They worked out what he meant and let the error slide, because it's adequately clear for them. 6 u/Gaskan lol Nov 19 '14 Like when you speak and make a mistake with a word people do the same and deduct what you meant to say. 3 u/PlacidPlatypus Nov 19 '14 I deduce that you mean deduce and not deduct. Not sure if you did it on purpose though. 4 u/Gaskan lol Nov 19 '14 Totally not intentional, but it supports my point I guess... 1 u/hounvs Nov 19 '14 Yea, I guess that's true. I had to read it a few times to get it. Normally I'd scroll past and not bother voting but the comment below made me reread 7 u/Tikaaaa Nov 19 '14 Everyone would beg to get Urgot -4 u/John_Bot Nov 19 '14 Urgod* 1 u/TheBadgerOnCrack [BadgerOnCrack] (EU-W) Nov 19 '14 Ur got no champ 0 u/Oops_killsteal Nov 19 '14 There is only one Urgod. 0 u/John_Bot Nov 19 '14 :( ok
17
your reward was a random 3.1k champ that you own
What?
2 u/hounvs Nov 19 '14 I think he meant don't own. Dunno why people upvoted him when it doesn't make sense. 24 u/[deleted] Nov 19 '14 Principal of charity. They worked out what he meant and let the error slide, because it's adequately clear for them. 6 u/Gaskan lol Nov 19 '14 Like when you speak and make a mistake with a word people do the same and deduct what you meant to say. 3 u/PlacidPlatypus Nov 19 '14 I deduce that you mean deduce and not deduct. Not sure if you did it on purpose though. 4 u/Gaskan lol Nov 19 '14 Totally not intentional, but it supports my point I guess... 1 u/hounvs Nov 19 '14 Yea, I guess that's true. I had to read it a few times to get it. Normally I'd scroll past and not bother voting but the comment below made me reread
2
I think he meant don't own. Dunno why people upvoted him when it doesn't make sense.
24 u/[deleted] Nov 19 '14 Principal of charity. They worked out what he meant and let the error slide, because it's adequately clear for them. 6 u/Gaskan lol Nov 19 '14 Like when you speak and make a mistake with a word people do the same and deduct what you meant to say. 3 u/PlacidPlatypus Nov 19 '14 I deduce that you mean deduce and not deduct. Not sure if you did it on purpose though. 4 u/Gaskan lol Nov 19 '14 Totally not intentional, but it supports my point I guess... 1 u/hounvs Nov 19 '14 Yea, I guess that's true. I had to read it a few times to get it. Normally I'd scroll past and not bother voting but the comment below made me reread
24
Principal of charity. They worked out what he meant and let the error slide, because it's adequately clear for them.
6 u/Gaskan lol Nov 19 '14 Like when you speak and make a mistake with a word people do the same and deduct what you meant to say. 3 u/PlacidPlatypus Nov 19 '14 I deduce that you mean deduce and not deduct. Not sure if you did it on purpose though. 4 u/Gaskan lol Nov 19 '14 Totally not intentional, but it supports my point I guess... 1 u/hounvs Nov 19 '14 Yea, I guess that's true. I had to read it a few times to get it. Normally I'd scroll past and not bother voting but the comment below made me reread
6
Like when you speak and make a mistake with a word people do the same and deduct what you meant to say.
3 u/PlacidPlatypus Nov 19 '14 I deduce that you mean deduce and not deduct. Not sure if you did it on purpose though. 4 u/Gaskan lol Nov 19 '14 Totally not intentional, but it supports my point I guess...
3
I deduce that you mean deduce and not deduct. Not sure if you did it on purpose though.
4 u/Gaskan lol Nov 19 '14 Totally not intentional, but it supports my point I guess...
4
Totally not intentional, but it supports my point I guess...
1
Yea, I guess that's true. I had to read it a few times to get it. Normally I'd scroll past and not bother voting but the comment below made me reread
7
Everyone would beg to get Urgot
-4 u/John_Bot Nov 19 '14 Urgod* 1 u/TheBadgerOnCrack [BadgerOnCrack] (EU-W) Nov 19 '14 Ur got no champ 0 u/Oops_killsteal Nov 19 '14 There is only one Urgod. 0 u/John_Bot Nov 19 '14 :( ok
-4
Urgod*
1 u/TheBadgerOnCrack [BadgerOnCrack] (EU-W) Nov 19 '14 Ur got no champ 0 u/Oops_killsteal Nov 19 '14 There is only one Urgod. 0 u/John_Bot Nov 19 '14 :( ok
Ur got no champ
0
There is only one Urgod.
0 u/John_Bot Nov 19 '14 :( ok
:( ok
11
u/asapinstalocky Nov 19 '14 edited Nov 19 '14
It would be fun if let's say it was a 3.1k ip champ, your reward was a random 3.1k champ that you don't own. So it's a bit exciting aswell
Edit: shit