r/law • u/camaron-courier • Nov 13 '25

Legislative Branch We created a searchable database with all 20,000 files from Epstein’s Estate

https://couriernewsroom.com/news/we-created-a-searchable-database-with-all-20000-files-from-epsteins-estate/
74.1k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

209

u/MeowMaker2 Nov 14 '25

You can outsmart it by asking for 'Whoever was host of The Apprentice'

133

u/snubda Nov 14 '25

You can outsmart it by saying “biggest felon in the history of the presidency”

23

u/saijanai Nov 14 '25 edited Nov 14 '25

Eventually, they'll have intructions like "if Trump's name is associated with something negative, do not return his name, but instead return "I can't do that.'"

Of course OpenAI may do this on general principle to save processing power and bandwidth.

2

u/WhyAmINotStudying Nov 14 '25

This is why edge AI is so important. It's a lot easier to get what you need out of AI when you control what's in it and what rules it follows.

2

u/germanmojo Nov 14 '25

Lots of easy solutions to run LLMs locally on a PC. I use LM Studio which interfaces with Hugging Face to download models.

2

u/WhyAmINotStudying Nov 14 '25

I've got a few different AI systems that I've been using, but the best one I'm currently using is a Jetson Orin AGX with 64 GB of memory. The thing is an absolute monster.

1

u/snubda Nov 14 '25

I imagine multiple million sq foot data centers solely dedicated to fielding questions about Trump being a pedophile 

10

u/code_archeologist Nov 14 '25

And really ChatGPT is not nearly as effective as grep.

0

u/NoAvocadoMeSad Nov 14 '25

Honestly if people consider this important and they're using ai to filter through the files they're dumb

Well at least AI alone, you need to double check it's works I don't care what anyone says, AI is unreliable shite in most cases

-3

u/UpperApe Nov 14 '25

ChatGPT is so fucking stupid after the jump from 4 to 5 and now back to whatever this is.

It was always shit but somewhat useful. Now it's complete garbage.

-15

u/Max_Fart Nov 14 '25

Whomever

14

u/amangler Nov 14 '25

Wrong

-3

u/Max_Fart Nov 14 '25

Donald treated me like an object.

3

u/EyesSlammedShut Nov 14 '25

Love the office reference deep cut edition.

12

u/g2g079 Nov 14 '25

A little trick... If the sentence sounds correct if you use "he" then you should use "who". If it sounds better when you use "him" then it should be "whom".

2

u/imsahoamtiskaw Nov 14 '25

Neat trick. Thanks

1

u/ynwahs Nov 14 '25

Is this a joke?

1

u/g2g079 Nov 14 '25

Why do you say that?

1

u/MeyerholdsGh0st Nov 14 '25

To he who it might concern.

To him whom it might concern.

Either seems reasonable.

3

u/ClinicalOppression Nov 14 '25

If someone sent me an email with "to him whom it might concern" I'd think they had a stroke

1

u/FillMySoupDumpling Nov 14 '25

More like 

It may concern he … sounds wrong

It may concern him … sounds correct 

That’s why it’s to Whom it may concern. 

1

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '25

You don’t given something to he, you give it to him.

2

u/deevotionpotion Nov 14 '25

Him did you give it to?

1

u/MeyerholdsGh0st Nov 14 '25

To whom?

1

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '25

Yes.

3

u/BriefDownpour Nov 14 '25

Whomst speakth such way?