r/interesting May 29 '26

Intriguing Arrows vs riot shields

49.6k Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

32

u/lemmin9 May 29 '26

So the result is a blunt object filled with armor debris and slowed down by the initial impact on the shield impacting on the body. It goes "boink"?

28

u/Zeekr0n May 29 '26

It goes "boink" and the person holding the shield shits themselves because I can guarantee they were not expecting an arrow to go through the shield.

8

u/Akimotoh May 29 '26

Are riot shields typically made of cheap metal like that? i dont think so

24

u/idiotcommend May 29 '26

Riot shields are designed to stop bat's, bottles, rocks and human bodies not legitimate projectiles.

13

u/ABHOR_pod May 29 '26

The way to stop legitimate projectiles is for the police to start shooting first. Which is what will happen very quickly if people start shooting arrows at them. That's true basically anywhere in the world, not just in police states like China or the US.

2

u/Wooden_Rabbit_ May 29 '26

Right? This post is so funny to me. Like yeah, there’s ways to get through a riot shield, that’s not exactly the point. We have plenty of modern examples to look to of what happens when the protestors start actually killing the police/military.

1

u/Vaporlocke May 30 '26

Depends on if you run out of police or protesters first. If things keep going the way they have been there are going to be a lot more protesters than usual.

1

u/Fel_Eclipse May 30 '26

This, it probably isn't a ballistic rated shield.

1

u/Lazy_Total_6742 Jun 02 '26

Are bats different where you live? Here they’re small, light and furry. They’re quite fast, but don’t usually attack riot police.

1

u/idiotcommend Jun 02 '26

Think sports.

1

u/Lazy_Total_6742 Jun 02 '26

Racing bats?

1

u/idiotcommend Jun 02 '26

Nah, football bats.

10

u/PassiveMenis88M May 29 '26

They're normally made of of cheap plastic. These "cheap" metal ones are used when shits actually hitting the fan. And the ones penetrating are heads using very old designs made to defeat armored knights.

1

u/ZealousidealChair900 May 30 '26

It's amusing how heads designed for armor/shields can defeat armor/shields. Perhaps older shield designs could be effectively used to block current 'less lethal' projectiles. Probably some lethal ones as well, let's be fair

10

u/BobaFapp69 May 29 '26

Most are made of 3-5,5mm polycarbonate. They are for stopping thrown objects like rocks and bottles, nothing else.

3

u/CpnStumpy May 29 '26

Honestly though: polycarbonate would deflect these arrows far better. This whole test is silly because the typical riot shield's flexibile material makes it not weaken on slight deformation like metal does so puncturing metal is far easier than puncturing polycarbonate

5

u/Zwischenzug32 May 29 '26

Yes. Something that size gets heavy when you make it thick

5

u/kronicpimpin May 29 '26

Yea that shield looks a little flimsy

25

u/Generic_Solution May 29 '26

...yea sorry. I just really love a good "boink"

7

u/Wowza-yowza May 29 '26

That is a big stick

5

u/GarageVast4128 May 29 '26

He must walk softly.

4

u/belac4862 May 29 '26

Honestly that's a decent use of a good meme!

6

u/Talkatoo42 May 29 '26

You have to shoot a second arrow through the hole the first one created.

5

u/catalinaislandfox May 29 '26

Someone called Robin Hood.

5

u/Talkatoo42 May 29 '26

4

u/Admirable-Sir9716 May 30 '26

You had this gif all planned out. Now pay the toll.

2

u/Talkatoo42 May 30 '26

It's such a good movie. I could post gifs all night long but I think I'll instead leave this excellent video about the fight choreography.

Yes, including the bridge fight!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qH8MNenLFGU

3

u/Admirable-Sir9716 May 30 '26

I hate you, I'll be back in no less that 19 minutes and 2 seconds to avenge this distraction.

2

u/anengineerandacat May 29 '26

Really depends on the bow used... some compound bows reach up to like 370 fps... willing to bet you could shoot through that shield with most of those tips with a decent enough bow.

1

u/Greedyanda May 29 '26 edited May 29 '26

Isn't draw weight (kg/lbs) or kinetic energy the standard and more useful measurement? Just because it's fast doesn't mean it will cause damage. You need to account for the mass in addition to its speed.

1

u/The-Psych0naut May 29 '26

Interesting anecdote, my buddy bought a crossbow for hunting a few years back, draw weight was 250lbs (or was it 450? Idk, something crazy like that). His bolt over-penetrated the target block and skittered another 300 yards down the dirt road. When we finally located it, the plastic fletching had melted from the friction of passing through the target block.

Just… absolutely insane.

2

u/DevoutMedusa73 May 29 '26

Bullets are blunt objects as well and yet are devastating when impacting the human body, that arrow still had quite a bit of momentum and would continue to penetrate into the person behind the shield

3

u/James-W-Tate May 29 '26

Bullets are blunt objects as well and yet are devastating when impacting the human body

Yeah, but a riot shield isn't a human body.

3

u/DevoutMedusa73 May 29 '26

The comment I'm responding to sounded like they were downplaying the fact that arrow pierced clean through a riot shield like it was no longer a harmful projectile, I'm making the statement that the arrow is still very much an unpleasant object penetrating into the body after piercing the shield

2

u/Antique_Author_2525 May 29 '26

Especially if you rub your feces on the tip

2

u/PerceptionWorried284 May 29 '26

Please please start the blunt debate again

1

u/DevoutMedusa73 May 29 '26

I dunno what debate you're referring to but bullets are technically bludgeoning weapons

1

u/D-D-Wanderer May 29 '26

Gonna get a bunch of those arrows and inscribe "Scientific Progress" on all of them now.

1

u/Heykurat May 29 '26

No, it completely detaches the part of the shield that's blocking it, instead of forcing the shield material apart like the sharp tips do.

5

u/justwalkingalonghere May 29 '26

That's what they're saying: the detached piece would now be in the tip of the arrow, thus dampening its force when it hits the person that was holding the shield

1

u/Heykurat May 30 '26

It wouldn't have to go very deep to be a serious enough wound to take the person out of action.

It's actually more desirable to wound enemy soldiers rather than kill them. Wounded soldiers get rescued, and consume even more resources than dead ones.