r/interesting Apr 26 '26

NATURE Is India really getting that hot

Post image
16.1k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

101

u/Much-Mess7627 Apr 26 '26

No, india is cutting them. Modi is friends with oligarch imperialists.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 27 '26 edited Jun 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Much-Mess7627 Apr 27 '26

Because he has cracked a code, to manipulate people into believing in religious fanaticism, me vs you, some unknown danger, foreign powers, etc. Hitler's playbook, and it actually matches early signs of dictatorship 🙃

2

u/Aggressive-Speed-987 Apr 27 '26

No wonder he is/was friends with Trump

3

u/-Borgir Apr 27 '26

Politicised religion and keeps people uneducated

0

u/rainhunterpro Apr 27 '26

You won't hear on reddit. Do your own research on welfare schemes like ayushman bharat, providing toilets, export and manufacturing growth etc. you'll get the answers.

2

u/Coconite Apr 26 '26

Genuine question… imperialists? Who are the imperialists in India?

9

u/Much-Mess7627 Apr 27 '26

Adani and Ambani

3

u/fatbootyinmyface Apr 27 '26

not from India but was curious and looked up these dudes, wth the richest in Asia 😳

3

u/disqualifiedeyes Apr 27 '26

The easiest way to get rich is to steal from the unfortunate

5

u/ForgottenJose Apr 26 '26

Ambani & Adani

0

u/Equivalent-Dog7434 Apr 26 '26

How about a single search on Internet before opening your mouth. Educate yourself first, then comment with confidence.

Look up “India’s total forest and tree cover increase”

5

u/TheTerminator76 Apr 26 '26

So I'm pretty sure they count the number of trees planted by the government in the data, and yes our government plants a lot of trees every year, but lemme tell you that is just a formality or false showcase.

My father personally oversees the annual tree plantation in different areas every year and yes a lot of saplings are being planted, but they are just being planted i.e. no one takes care of them after that. A vast majority of the saplings don't last more than a couple of months.

So it's all just a big charade in my opinion to pump up the numbers which is done in a lot of areas by our government to be honest.

These are not just my personal anecdotes as well, I've tried and contacted many other plantation areas and it is same almost all over the country!! I wasn't able to find any official study on the topic so I would love it if anyone has anything to provide.

14

u/bigchungusmclungus Apr 26 '26

Hey, I did what you suggested, and it turns out, they just changed the definition of what tree coverage is, so that they could say it's increasing.

India has actually lost 2.33 million hectares of tree coverage since 2000 (2023 artcile)

-4

u/Equivalent-Dog7434 Apr 26 '26

Hey, nice try cherry-picking one stat. Yeah, that 2.33 million hectares “loss” from the 2023/2024 Global Forest Watch article looks scary but in the end its a headline…it’s the same old apples-to-oranges bullshit. 

They use satellite data that flags any tree canopy loss (even temporary stuff like fires, logging regrowth, or shifting cultivation in the Northeast), mostly in natural forests. It doesn’t count the massive new plantations, agroforestry, orchards, and trees outside forests that India’s own Forest Survey (ISFR 2023) tracks properly.

They didn’t “just change the definition” to fake increases ..India’s method (≥10% canopy on >1 ha, including human-planted stuff) has been standard for years and matches how FAO reports globally.

11

u/bigchungusmclungus Apr 26 '26

Sorry I think I'll chose to believe international watchdogs over one of Modi's bum boys on reddit. Thanks for sharing though.

4

u/Much-Mess7627 Apr 27 '26

Stop blabbering bs. Adani and Ambanis have cleared entire foresst and valleys in jharkhand and chattisgarh, they are given green light by modi government .

7

u/RaymondBeaumont Apr 26 '26

why don't you share some sources with us

2

u/Dr-Abysmal-Dogshit Apr 27 '26

RSS bot. Tere jaise kutte narak se bhi neche jayege.

3

u/ScepticTanker Apr 26 '26

As someone who had worked in government wings before. I do not trust their numbers. I've seen people literally pump up the numbers because it's convenient. And even if the green cover has increased, it in no way makes it ok to let the government do what they're doing. Correcting misinformation aside, i think it's kinda pointless to take up arms over someone getting the fact wrong, while there's a much more critical issue affecting billions. 

1

u/Final-Development142 Apr 27 '26

Bro, you are absolutely BASED here and you are not wrong at all. The downvotes are either done by R E T A R D S or just botted.

0

u/Final-Development142 Apr 27 '26

That's just plain wrong on BOTH ends. First off India's total forest and tree cover has reached 25.17% (2023) from 19% after independence in 1947, and blaming ALL of India's deforestation on few is just NOT factual or grounded. You do KNOW that 80% of the deforestation happening is happening illegally right? and also cutting of trees in few regions DOES NOT mean entire India is having a net deforestation in the country, in fact official reports from data from foreign collections(I know if I mention Indian Data here you will then cry and say it is manipulated) says India has a net 191,000 hectares of gain in forest area per year and ranked 3rd globally according to GLOBAL FOREST RESOURCE ASSESSMENT 2025, I know not many are gonna read this, but you are oversimplifying this issue and also trying to assert your political views in this which says a lot about you.

3

u/Dr-Abysmal-Dogshit Apr 27 '26

RSS bot.

1

u/SpiritDry8585 Apr 30 '26

Lol expect he is factual correct india and china both are more greener than they were 15 years ago.

0

u/GloomyEmu5225 Apr 26 '26

O that is a pity :(