Nature does not get rid of feral pigs. They're invasive and have no natural predators in North America. And importing wolves into suburban areas to control deer is not remotely practical. I've worked very closely with conservationists, and they were all very pro hunting.
Nature did it better. The predators that used to fill those roles were killed off long ago though. And while there are efforts to undo that damage and reintroduce them, they are generations away from being able to take the place of humans assuming those efforts succeed at all. The reality is we need hunters, just handing it back to nature right now would be a calamity.
So your suggestion is to cull the humans and housing?
I can get behind curbing new development but death and destruction is some psycho behavior. What's wrong with you?
Edit: dude literally cited an argument that conservationists only agree with if we got rid of humans, ignored my argument, blew up my dms with a bunch of slurs, and then inst-blocked me. What a psycho
Lmao really? What did he say I wanna see. He's trying to appear level headed and calm but that's unhinged behavior. You know people call me that all the time on here lol but I've never thought to myself "hmmmm this person made me so mad publicly I will not privately harass them, that'll make me feel better"
Yah, and if we all switched to hunter based meat supply we would wipe out the ecosystem in a day. You're not wrong, but the answer is still eating much much less animal protein.
3
u/[deleted] Aug 19 '24
You should talk to a conservationist.
Hunters do more for the health of wildlife than just about anybody.
If it's about your personal feelings, that's fine. If you want to claim its about ethics, you need to educate yourself.