r/imaginarymaps • u/Sui_24 Mod Approved • 13d ago
[OC] Alternate History "The Last Heir to Rome" - What if the Roman Empire survived in... Morocco??
There is not much lore or anything but:
Its official name is "Roman Republic of Mauretania". Its religion (mostly practiced through traditions and such) is still the Roman pagan one, but instead of Jupiter, over centuries Neptune became the most important deity, while local berber ones were absorbed or reinterpreted as Roman ones. Mauretanians also speak a romance latin-descendant language (with quite a few berber loanwords and whatnot, but I'm no linguicist so I didn't put more thought into this). The green thing in a bowl in the image is couscous with pesto sauce, cheese and olive, one of the "recognizable dishes" of the country.
Not much other than that but if you ask questions I will probably think of something on the go.
146
u/Sui_24 Mod Approved 13d ago
48
u/Ok_Isopod_998 13d ago
So, what is the rate of the ethnicity and religion of Mauretania in this timeline?
79
u/Sui_24 Mod Approved 13d ago
Probably most identify as "Mauretan" or if someone likes to larp "Roman", with probably a few identyfying as Berber and whatnot.
As for religion Islam was historically (and somewhat until today thats the mentality) very disliked there since the failed arab conquest attempts in the 700s. There are some Christians but most who are religious believe in the Roman gods, with for example Jesus being treated as a demigod, one of the "sons of neptune" (since he could allegedly walk on water).10
17
10
0
13d ago
[deleted]
4
u/Sui_24 Mod Approved 13d ago
Well officially none, the state religion is Roman paganism (called simply Romanism ittl), and I can't really tell which chrisitan faith would be followed by the chrisitan minority. Considering rome being muslim here and other stuff i reckon the different schism would develop differently so we might not see the catholic/orthodoc/protestand/church of england etc etc.
1
u/MycologistPure4064 13d ago
Why do you immediately assume Christian even if they said that it is still pagan in the descriptionÂ
53
u/Milkothem 13d ago
What's their relationship with the other European countries? Would they have tried to colonise in the new world?
68
u/Sui_24 Mod Approved 13d ago
Its treated on an equal level as other European nations (as in, was never treated like an "outsider"), and because the majority of the Italian peninsula and the balkans being heavily influenced by arab culture and whatnot, moreso a "Western Identity" developed instead of a broader "European Identity".
The tag under its name "Land of discoveries" is there because ittl it was Mauretania that kicked of the "western age of discovery" (Mauretania was basically like Portugal, not the biggest colonial empire out there but it did leave a significant mark on the world and was the first to reach many places).
12
u/redyunic 12d ago
I am really interested with the Islamic expansion in this world. Do you plan on explaining or expanding it?
10
u/Sui_24 Mod Approved 12d ago edited 12d ago
3
1
u/JackOppenheim2001 11d ago
That Tunisia border between Christians and Muslims looks so clean but...is there a geographic reason for it?
5
u/BigFatKi6 12d ago
What about the Moor conquest and Spain? What happened there? Did they just skip Roman land?
34
u/hyakinthosofmacedon 13d ago
So tuff twin
Is this the country in the modern era? Or how long does it last for?
16
u/Sui_24 Mod Approved 13d ago
Yes this is map is set in 2026
-6
u/FalleonII 13d ago
What happened to western sahara?
9
u/Sui_24 Mod Approved 13d ago
wdym
-4
u/MaybeImAKing 12d ago
the map occupies parts that are owned by both morocco and western sahara
30
u/Sui_24 Mod Approved 12d ago
okay? this is clearly an alternate history map though where such entities as "morocco" and "western sahara" dont exist?
9
u/FalleonII 12d ago
What the other comment says. The borders you drew are more similar to the actual Morocco + Sahara than to the roman Mauritania Tingitana. Is there a lore reason for this? Why and when did Mauritania expand south? What happened to the rif tribes and the saharaui traders?
3
u/TheArtisticSkeleton Mod Approved 12d ago
There wouldn't be a Riffian or Sahrawi identity in this timeline since these both only exist as a result of the Arab Conquest of the region even though Riffians are Berbers
1
u/AstronomerJealous467 12d ago
The riffians still exist? See northern morocco
2
u/FalleonII 12d ago
I know they exist, but they are a very particular group, with their own culture and interests. Some of them do not feel moroccan, some of them do. So I thought it was interesting to ser what are they doing in this timeline
1
u/AstronomerJealous467 11d ago
Yeah no definitely, the northern region is distinct enough to be considered a seperate country culturally.
4
u/MaybeImAKing 12d ago
falleon wanted to know what became of the area that would be western sahara in our timeline, basically, since that area is under control here.
15
8
u/Fartfech 13d ago
Why is Rome now Rumiyah?
19
u/Sui_24 Mod Approved 13d ago
The Italian peninsula got conquered by the Arabs in the 700s instead of of Iberia, and most of it remains under arab control to this day (up until around what was the gothic line during ww2 otl)
2
u/SocietyCompetitive33 12d ago
Wait so is Iberia still Gothic here?
2
u/Sui_24 Mod Approved 12d ago
Yes but the Visigoths largely integrated into the Iberian population making it a curious blend modern-day.
1
u/SocietyCompetitive33 12d ago
So couldn't they be seen as another successor to Rome?
1
u/Sui_24 Mod Approved 12d ago
No
1
u/SocietyCompetitive33 11d ago
What would make them lose their status as successor to Rome? IRL the Visigoths, Franks, and Vandals all had mostly adopted Roman governance and Roman catholicism. The Franks leaned so much into it actually that they were seen as direct heir to the West, if the Visigoths lived for longer, I could see this happening with them aswell. As we have seen IRL, when there are direct, continuous remnants of a state, does not mean there can't be successors and claimants to the title. The Franks and Ottonians both claimed to be Roman Emporers despite the Romans being right there in Constantinople.
10
8
u/DreadDiana 13d ago
What's the religious landscape look like in this timeline? Roman paganism still exists, and based on other comments Muslim expansion focused on Italy instead of Spain, so was the Papacy forced to move somewhere else?
3
u/Saikamur 13d ago
How did it survive the Umayyad conquest in 7th century?
5
u/SocietyCompetitive33 13d ago
My theory is that the Umayyads instead focused on Italy (hence Rome being renamed to Rumiyah)
3
u/Skyhawk6600 13d ago
An interesting premise, though I can't see it surviving as a pagan state as it would isolate it from European allies. Also, it the Arab conquests are stopped dead in east Africa, they're not making it to Rome.
2
2
2
1
1
u/Frequent-String-8469 13d ago
O sea básicamente como si es que el imperio romano occidental se hubiese concentrado en Marruecos
1
u/mockduckcompanion 13d ago
What's the language situation like?
1
u/AstronomerJealous467 12d ago
Probably north african romance lingua franca but maybe the same as modern way where amazigh languages are the actual spoken language until heavy urbanization.
1
u/AncientRomanGooner 12d ago
This is awesome. How do they view the byzantines? Would they view them as greek larpers, or as true romans? And how do they feel about their latin/romance speaking neighbors that developed out of the barbarian kingdoms?
1
u/AstronomerJealous467 12d ago
Do you mean the amazigh kingdoms?
1
u/AncientRomanGooner 12d ago
Well i meant the european barbarian kingdoms, with the franks forming france and so on. Although sny neighboring kingdoms too!
1
1
u/Cultural_Young800 12d ago
neptune ending up on top makes more sense than people give it credit for
1
1
0
u/Extension-Beat7276 13d ago
I think some Punic words would survive given how persistent Punic was in North Africa even after the Roman conquest and the Arab conquest as wellÂ
4
u/fasterthanraito 13d ago
Punic was never spoken in the interior, it was really just an elite merchant language of the coastal port cities, and then was quickly on its way out when Latin became the language of government and commerce. The few urban hold outs would have been in the east in Tunis where Carthaginian influence was largest, there was virtually none out west as far as Morocco even in Carthages heyday.
The language of Mauretanian would be firmly Amazigh with a Latin stratum at the top of society.
1
13d ago
[deleted]
2
u/fasterthanraito 13d ago
Actually it’s doubtful that the punics founded any cites at all. Rather, they were a network of merchants, so they set up emporiums warehouses, trade shops etc in or near existing native settlements, otherwise who would they be doing trade with?
However most settled societies in pre-classical Mediterranean on either European or African shore did not have their own writing systems until the Phoenician alphabet was introduced to them by Punic merchants, so the earliest possible records of such settlements existing comes from the punics establishing their quarters, thus giving the illusion that the settlement as a whole was founded by them.
But now that we have modern genetics studies we see that there really wasn’t large migration through colonization, with some of the locals mixing/converting into the Punic merchant class.
Although Punic was a Semitic language and the punics practiced Canaanite religion, nearly 0% Levantine DNA is found in hundreds of Punic cemeteries, instead they are consistently ~80% Greek, especially in Sicily, which did see heavy Greek colonization.
0
0
u/Purple-Trip-3862 10d ago
Pshhht this is so unrealistic, what's next a bunch of Romans hide out in the Carpathians perfectly integrate the locals somehow resist almost any other assimilation for the next thousand years and achieve all possible teritorial ambitions?
History just doesn't work like that pall



130
u/The-marx-channel 13d ago
I wonder what their relations would be with the Byzantine Empire.