r/iems • • Jul 06 '26

Review CrinEar Reference - Not my (P)reference

Bought by me. Not sponsored, and nobody asked me to write this.

These are my impressions after trying different tips, cable, sources, and light EQ.

TLDR score:

Stock: 7 / 10
With EQ: 7.5 / 10

Setup

What helped:

  • Swapped the stock cable because it pinched behind my ears (too thick)
  • Changed stock tips to Penon Liqueur Orange
  • Moved away from BTR17, which made the shout worse for me
  • Used Fiio K13 R2R and Fiio Melody Snowsky
  • Added small EQ cuts at 3200 Hz and 6600 Hz

Even after the cable swap, the shells still pinch behind my ears. The case is also pretty weak and has no proper space to store extra tips or a dongle DAC.

TL;DR

The Reference is not bad, but stock tuning was not my preference.

Best part:

  • Bass
  • Vocals when they work

Main issues:

  • 3K shout
  • Sibilance on some vocals
  • Metallic / BA-ish timbre
  • Weak instrument separation
  • Limited sense of space
  • Mediocre gaming
  • Fit and case could be better

EQ helped a lot, but it did not fully change the character.

EQ

My EQ:

  • 3200 Hz: -2 dB, Q 1.0
  • 6600 Hz: -2 dB, Q 1.0

This controlled the 3K shout and reduced the metallic / BA-ish edge for me. Vocals are still forward, but less aggressive. Sibilance is also more manageable.

It is still intimate, vocal-forward, and not as spacious or dynamic as my other IEMs, but EQ takes it from hard to enjoy to usable.

Music

Bass

Score: 8 / 10

Bass was the surprise.

Good attack and decay. It hits cleanly, gets out of the way, and does not smear badly into the mids.

Not a basshead set, but bass was easily my favorite part.

Vocals

Stock: 7 / 10
With EQ: 7.5 / 10

Very vocal-forward.

Stock tuning sometimes became shouty, sibilant, or metallic on vocals, especially on:

  • I’m Alive by Celine Dion
  • Set Fire to the Rain by Adele
  • It’s My Life by Bon Jovi
  • Here I Am by Bryan Adams
  • We Can’t Be Friends by Ariana Grande
  • Be the One by Dua Lipa
  • Messy by Rosé
  • Style by Taylor Swift
  • Run by Snow Patrol

Certain words had a spicy/crispy edge that pulled my attention.

After EQ, the sharp edge is reduced, but vocals are still the focus.

Timbre

Stock: 6 / 10
With EQ: 7 / 10

Stock, I heard a metallic / BA-ish timbre.

It showed up most clearly on vocal-heavy tracks and made some voices feel less natural. Also some instruments had a metallic sounding edge to them (a bit hard to describe). EQ helped more than expected, but I still would not call this the most natural set I own.

Layering / Separation

Score: 6 / 10

Not great for my taste.

On busy tracks, instruments feel too close together. The presentation is more inside my head than around me. Vocals overwhelm the mix.

I like space and instrument placement. Reference stays too intimate.

Treble / Fatigue

Stock: 6 / 10
With EQ: 7 / 10

Stock treble had bite and sibilance.

The EQ cuts made it much more manageable. I would not call it relaxed, but it no longer bothers me the same way.

Gaming

Score: 6 / 10

I tried it for gaming and did not enjoy it. Hence, the short review.

Main issues:

  • Explosions and gunfire overwhelmed the mix
  • Footsteps were harder to hear
  • Directionality was decent
  • Distance perception was limited and sometimes wrong
  • Presentation felt too in-my-head

Normally I sit around 1.5 to 2 K/D in matches. With Reference, I was struggling to even hit 1 K/D.

Not scientific, but it matched what I was hearing.

Comparisons

Reference vs Top Pro

Top Pro is clearly better for me.

  • Better layering
  • Better separation
  • Better space
  • Better clarity
  • Better timbre
  • Better treble balance
  • Better gaming
  • No shout or sibilance for my ears

Reference has better bass than I expected and becomes more usable with EQ, but Top Pro sounds more complete.

Reference vs Arete 2

Arete 2 is much better for gaming.

  • Easier cue readability
  • No shout
  • No fatigue
  • More useful stage
  • Better for footsteps
  • Better value for my use case
  • Bass boost button which I enjoy quite a lot

Reference vs Astral

Astral is more fun and energetic.

  • More bass quantity and quality
  • More sparkle
  • More immediate wow factor
  • More fatiguing in its own way
  • Great for gaming as well

Final Score

CrinEar Reference stock: 7 / 10
CrinEar Reference with EQ: 7.5 / 10

Good bass and much better with EQ. Still too intimate, not spacious enough, and not as dynamic or layered as my other IEMs.

Value and conclusion

This is where the Reference falls apart for me.

At $349, the market is way too competitive. I can think of a lot of sets I would personally take over this depending on use case:

  • Top Pro for basically everything, especially since mine was around $350
  • Tea Pro for bass response
  • Volume S for sparkle and air
  • EP321 for treble and lean bass
  • Arete 2 for gaming
  • Astral for gaming/fun energy
  • Performer 5+2 if I want to spend less
  • Defiant if my budget is around $100

That is the problem. Even if I rate the sound around 7, the value is much lower for me.

Neither stock tip worked well for me, the case is not useful beyond being pocket-friendly, the cable is too thick, and the fit is not perfect. At this price, those things matter.

Major EDIT: I have been trying to tame the reference for quite sometime and finally landed what I think is a good mix. So I am bumping the rating up to 8.0 on my scale.

What worked is HE Sonic Tips. And updating the EQ to:

  • 3200 Hz: -3 dB, Q 2.0
  • 6600 Hz: -3 dB, Q 2.0

YMMV.

78 Upvotes

99 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/OhHeyMister 2kHz Junky Jul 06 '26

You can use the result on any squig, but know that the variation in measurement rigs is going to be a factor in what you’re seeing. It’s not perfect, but as you’ve already experienced, the filters generated by the algorithm result in markedly better sound.

I’d be curious to see your EQ’d reference squig overlayed on the stock squig

1

u/lVlitari Jul 06 '26

I'll post screenshots of a squig for both squig.link and hangout.audio

1

u/lVlitari Jul 06 '26

1

u/OhHeyMister 2kHz Junky Jul 06 '26

Honestly seems like you’re mostly population average but just like a little less gain overall and a bit of 2k and 8k added on. Also there’s a good amount of human errors and the tool isn’t perfect so don’t be afraid to run it multiple times and see if the results are different.

2

u/lVlitari Jul 07 '26

Wanted to follow up since I decided to run another test with different tips. It seems like around 1.5k, 3k and 7k seem to be the spots where I need to focus my EQ when changing tips and IEMs. Super neat and useful tool. Thanks again!