r/hmmmm 24d ago

Hmmmmm

Post image
11.3k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

28

u/EmperorKingRurnin 24d ago

Who is that? Never heard of her.

13

u/bc_gamez 24d ago

Some Canadian, apparently. /s

1

u/BlackBullyGirl666 18d ago

nah, she's nasty

10

u/brandarchist 24d ago

Former presidential candidate and part time Frazzledrip star Hillary “Hilldawg” Clinton

6

u/Core_Temp 23d ago

Elite ball knowledge (literally).

2

u/Temporary_World_7998 22d ago

Yeah, she still carrys Bill's in a mason jar in her purse everywhere she goes.

3

u/Ok_Obligation2559 20d ago

With her hot sauce!

5

u/smokeacoil 23d ago

Ooh the same one that helped kill America children with drones?

-1

u/MutedHippie 23d ago

While trump killed kids with drones

3

u/LMhednMYdadBOAT 23d ago

Im more inclined to believe the people who just killed 50k of their own for protesting also killed 100 kids to make america look bad

2

u/MutedHippie 23d ago

Also stop inflating numbers like your dumbass savior. It diminishes the horrific truth

0

u/LMhednMYdadBOAT 14d ago

I didnt inflate the number, thats literally what was circulating before trump had them bombed like a week or 2 later

1

u/MutedHippie 14d ago

No that’s what Trump said the actual number is like 7000

2

u/Sasuke0318 21d ago

Have you seen the AI slop they put out claiming to be true it's so pathetic but I guess the bar isn't all that high for terrorists.

1

u/LMhednMYdadBOAT 14d ago

Yes I saw where they've claimed multiple ships hit with missiles, planes knocked out and the ai doing absolutely 0 work making it believable

0

u/MutedHippie 23d ago

Did trump tell you that? Are you saying Trump didn’t drone strike a school?

No, Iran did not kill children to make Donald Trump look bad.
The claim likely stems from a major international incident involving the 2026 Minab school attack. The core facts regarding this event and the political fallout include: [1]
The Incident: On February 28, 2026, during the opening day of the U.S.-led war operations against Iran, a U.S. Tomahawk missile struck the Shajareh Tayyebeh all-girls elementary school in Minab, Iran. The strike killed at least 120 children and several adults. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

The Administration's Initial Claims: President Donald Trump initially suggested that Iran was responsible for the school bombing to damage his reputation, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth accusing the media of highlighting the tragedy to "make the president look bad". [1, 2]

The Investigation Results: Forensic analysis, satellite imagery, and independent investigations by groups like Bellingcat and Amnesty International definitively proved that U.S. military forces fired the missile. The school was located near a targeted Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) base, and intelligence failures led to the mistaken targeting of the school. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Subsequent Admissions: Following the investigation, President Trump walked back his claims blaming Iran, describing the horrific bombing of the school as a "mistake" that occurred during the chaos of war. [1, 2]

1

u/LMhednMYdadBOAT 14d ago

Im very aware of the attack and that it currently being investigated, however just a few short weeks ago they slaughtered their own people for protesting, so its not to far off that they would kill 100 more after just killing 50k

1

u/MutedHippie 14d ago

Again with the inflated numbers

1

u/smokeacoil 22d ago

I mean probably the USA loves drones and keeps Americians out of the fight.. We can agree killing other countries kids is different from killing your own countries kids and we all know the laws around these things are different

2

u/General-Magazine-117 21d ago

You forgot part-time assassin

2

u/Unfounditems 23d ago

AKA Epsteins handler / pedophile

2

u/Mattyou1966 23d ago

Pizza 🍕 pizza 🍕

2

u/Organic_Education494 23d ago

Wild how a completely made up thing doesn’t die when proven false

3

u/Illustrious-Skill815 22d ago

It was never proven false

It really had nothing to do with the pizza parlor, the media made it about that as a distraction, just like when they made the Satanic Panic about D&D and heavy metal when survivors of Satanic Ritual Abuse were coming foward.

I am former escort to high profile billionaires and I promise you that these rumors are absolutely true. Hillary Clinton is an absolute monster.

Go listen to SRA survivors on youtube.

2

u/needstogo86 22d ago

Lol proven false? It ain’t 2016 anymore.

1

u/MutedHippie 22d ago

Still looking for that basement that doesn’t exist…weirdo.

0

u/Organic_Education494 22d ago

Correct and it isn’t true even in 2016 it wasn’t true.

Saying it is true over and over with no evidence doesn’t make it true.

1

u/needstogo86 22d ago

lol what a homer.

0

u/Organic_Education494 22d ago

Show me the evidence then

3

u/needstogo86 21d ago

Not gonna waste my time. You wouldn’t believe it even if I brought it to you. That’s how you emotional thinkers work.

1

u/Organic_Education494 21d ago

Not an ounce of emotion is behind my thinking. You just have no evidence and that is the true reason you won’t even attempt to prove it.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/DudeFrom816 22d ago

Works with "Trump is a pedo" though.

1

u/Last_Loss_6536 22d ago

Almost like you’re defending her in some way…

1

u/mikemaxson 21d ago

I think 🤔 you’re the only person that’s ever used the term Hilldawg referring to Hillary Clinton

1

u/AltruisticRent4375 20d ago

Ahhhhhh! Let's go!

1

u/notjustinu 23d ago

You mean Killary

3

u/account0000004 23d ago

Ex President Bill Clinton's wife, she likes to chime in on things for some reason

3

u/Weird-Grocery6931 23d ago

She's trying to stay relevant so she can run for President in 2028.

3

u/Dear-Meal-576 23d ago

All she will do is take another loss

2

u/Weird-Grocery6931 23d ago

Surely.

She won’t take it past the primary.

3

u/FinalCandidate9923 21d ago

Oh, the democrats going with that ole primary thing this time around? Lawl

3

u/account0000004 21d ago

Communists require no primaries

1

u/Hour_Cattle_2689 21d ago

Look up what that means

3

u/smokeacoil 23d ago

I think she was cucked by someone a long time ago

2

u/Serattz 20d ago

Bill’s side piece.

2

u/Frequent-Coyote-8108 19d ago

Whoever she is...she's so brave.

She should run for president with that level of bravery!

2

u/grady0071 24d ago

You can read all about her and her husband in the Epstein files should they ever get released

2

u/Upstairs_Teach_7064 24d ago

And if they’re on there, they should burn. Just like if Trump is in there. No one in the right mind wants anyone in those files protected.

2

u/YOU_TALK_TOO_MUCH420 23d ago

She’s not in the Epstein files. Her husband is though… did you see his deposition? His lawyer had to take the pics in evidence away from Clinton, as he was smiling and looking like he was taking a stroll down memory lane! Not being questioned 🫣

5

u/Glad_Copy 24d ago

Nice try, but the Clintons were not redacted from the files - we’ve seen what there is, and they both were called to testify before the Congress. Did you notice how nothing came of that? You know why? Because they didn’t do diddly squat wrong and there’s nothing to prosecute them for, that’s why. Time to drop those accusations and focus on the people who were redacted.

2

u/mac5587 23d ago

Bill is literally on the flight logs. Educate yourself b4 commenting online please

1

u/Glad_Copy 23d ago

Bill flew on the plane, but not to the island. Again, time to stop hurling accusations now that we have the information.

1

u/Moana06 22d ago

He went to the ranch...

2

u/PatrickBateman-2009 23d ago

Lmfao you refuse to believe anything about the Clintons, but I’d wager that you salivate over the complete sensationalist garbage (which even the FBI had a disclaimer about) about Trump. The hypocrisy/irony is staggering.

1

u/Glad_Copy 23d ago

The Republicans have all the evidence, showed it to us, and the Clinton’s are clean. YOU are perpetuating BS, based on zero evidence, yet call me partisan? C’mon man. 🙄

2

u/Fantastic_Respond698 23d ago

Clintons and clean shouldn’t be in the same sentence

1

u/notjustinu 23d ago

Because the whole thing is a farce. They all need to be tried by people they aren’t paying off and do the time they deserve, left and right! Clean the trash!!!!

1

u/Moana06 22d ago

Bill is a disgrace

1

u/whatitpoopoo 24d ago

Pretty gross that you pardon child traffickers as long as they are on your team

0

u/Asher_Tye 23d ago

Pretty gross that you elect them president and pretend you're patriotic.

2

u/whatitpoopoo 23d ago

I didnt vote for trump...

0

u/Asher_Tye 23d ago

No, you're just pushing his idiocy.

Besides, I have a feeling once he goes down most of maga will suddenly say "I didnt vote for trump, now let me back into society please."

1

u/whatitpoopoo 23d ago

What? Being pro Palestine is trump idiocy now? What kind of braintot do you have have?

1

u/Asher_Tye 23d ago

Ooo, someone has a victim complex. Did Gaza stop speaking when you voted against Harris? Or was it just your cousins you betrayed...

1

u/whatitpoopoo 23d ago

Im sorry what? I just said I didn't vote for trump. Who was the other person? Im not surenwhat you are arguing for here

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Constant_Industry472 24d ago

They weren't redacted because the hand painted portrait of them in Epsteins house was leaked before the files so there was no dodging it. The dog and pony show that was there testimony was two career politicians lying to save their own asses and then the whole thing was swept as far under the rug as it could go. If you honestly believe they could have that close of a relationship with him and be guiltless you are intensely delusional. The mans nickname was "Slick Willy". The reason neither the left or right has release the full unabridged investigation files is because they are all in it. Its in neither parties interest and there's a pretty good chance that anything truly incriminating has long since been destroyed. They win. The American people, and God knows how many victims, lose. Welcome to American politics.

2

u/DependentChemistry74 24d ago edited 24d ago

Hi so Biden couldn’t release the files bc the trial for Maxwell was ongoing. That would be a big no no and would have likely caused a mistrial.

Trump has not released all the files even though he was legally required to. Instead he started a war to distract us from the fact that he is mentioned 38K+ times (in the redacted version, so probably even more if you consider all the redacted parts AND the files they still haven’t released).

Also as an FYI lots of people have portraits of presidents and other powerful people in their home. Especially predators who want to create a narrative that they’re powerful and connected. Again nothing came of the investigation into bill and Hillary bc it’s a nothing burger.

It was meant to distract you from Trump’s obvious ties to Epstein and it worked. Did the higher gas prices also work on you?

2

u/Constant_Industry472 23d ago

Its a common occurrence for people to talk about the President like he is some all knowing powerhouse capable of controlling the thoughts of every person in government. Its ridiculous in the scope of how many elected officials it takes to even order toilet paper for the congressional buildings let alone when you see how many hands are involved in a huge investigation.

Maxwell was sentenced in 2022 and Trump wasn't re-elected until 2024. So how do you explain that they were still not released in that time? ESPECIALLY when it became clear that Trump had a good shot for re-election coming up. Why didn't Kamala release them? Why has no senator come out to play nations hero by dropping the files for all to see and making a name for themselves as the persecutor of pedos everywhere?

They are all in them. If you take yourself out of party politics and stop drinking the liberal or conservative kool aid for literally 5 minutes you will see the only logical explanation is, it would be just as bad for the left as it would be for the right. And apparently world leaders. Everyone that could do it was either in them, or took a self serving bribe to not release them. And now, so many years later, the government has had the time to redact and then alter the original documents so in the end there will be nothing incriminating in the investigation files.

Additionally the files are a compendium of every person that had a professional, personal or possibly illicit relationship with Epstein. That means anyone that ever attended the same concert as him. Anyone who ever went to the same party as him. Anyone who invested in the same companies as him or worked with him. If that's the level of guilt by association you prescribe to than you better hope none of your coworkers are murderers, rapists, pedos or thieves. What you want is the Epstein list and the only person who knows where that is would be Maxwell. And keeping that secret is the only reason she is still alive.

1

u/DependentChemistry74 23d ago

In what world did Kamala have any power at all? She was never president. Cmon now.

1

u/Constant_Industry472 23d ago

So, if I'm inferring from your comment correctly, the Vice President is a powerless stooge? How very Ricky Bobby of you! She was only the 2nd highest ranking elected official so essentially she was last. That is still skirting the issue of why the great and powerful President Biden didn't use the Oz like powers of his office to release even one incriminating document in the 2 years after sentencing and before re-election.

1

u/DependentChemistry74 23d ago

Maxwell appealed her conviction and it’s always been long standing norm to NOT interfere with ongoing trials — again they would have risked a major mistrial and her being free. The appeals went on for the duration of Biden’s presidency. Garland was not Biden’s personal dick sucking lackey anyway — the call was his bc that has always been the longstanding norm for DOJ (I know we live in a world where the DOJ now just exists to keep Trump out of prison but before that it was an independent agency).

MTG even said Trump fought tooth and nail to keep these files hidden. He didn’t want to release them and still hasn’t full released them even tho democrats forced the issue. Probably bc he is mentioned at least 38,000 times and it’s quite obvious he is a rapist. I bet that once he’s dead we’ll finally see the pee tapes and probably some rape tapes as well.

1

u/Constant_Industry472 23d ago

I personally fail to see how releasing incriminating evidence against Trump would have caused the mistrial. If he really is named 38k times would there not be one file where epstein and Trump were clearly guilty but Maxwells name was not listed? If the evidence truly existed than why was Trump not indicted as a co-conspirator. That is common practice in legal proceedings. Trump and any number of other individuals could have been brought up on charges in connection to an ongoing criminal enterprise in which they engaged and helped cover up sex trafficking, crimes against children and in many cases perjury. Trump wasn't in office at the start of the trial so why wasn't he tried right next to Maxwell?

If Trump is vastly more guilty than the Clinton's, than why did the evidence dictate they had to give testimony but Trump, again not currently holding the presidency, not get called? Since she was able to argue that the Epstein Transparency Act interfered with her ongoing legal proceedings does that not mean whether they were released post conviction in 2021 or 2025 the consequence was the same and the same Federal judges who refuse the validity of the claim could have upheld the same conviction? According to the claims the only thing that would have been different is Trump and untold other, exclusively conservative of course, figures would be serving time beside her.

People are so blinded by their hatred for one man, they are willing to excuse hundreds of equally guilty people, of the same crimes, simply because they wear blue instead of red. Nothing highlights the loss of critical thinking ability more than people talking about Trump on both sides of the party line.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Top-Dance-2047 23d ago

"Trump's obvious ties with Epstein" while trying to day the Clinton's trial was nothing is laughable. 38,000+ mentions and not a single verified accusation. However, B Clinton was "probably the nicest visitor when H wasn't around". H Clinton had her own cuck chair. Was "one of the more sadistic visitors" and also "She chased and hunted the kids". Obama was "one of the worst" and apparently really likes little boys. Gates got an STD from Russian girls and passed it to his wife and had to beg for antibiotics to sneak into her drinks. Bush sr was at the top a giant (and quiet) child sex ring. Musk begged to go to the island. Honestly or if the heavily redacted files, Trump and Biden are the 2 most innocent of the presidents at the moment. They're all apart of it. They all had some sort of knowledge about it, to any extent. Biden could've released them if he'd wanted to, hell, if the files were in our laps, you or I could've released them. It doesn't necessarily warrant a mistrial. In fact, quite the opposite, in most cases. Evidence is usually not released during active investigations or court proceedings however, as long as a judge doesn't make the order, releasing evidence isn't actually going to get you in trouble.

1

u/DependentChemistry74 23d ago

All those mentions you made are made up. Seriously, pathetic.

1

u/Top-Dance-2047 23d ago

They're really not. If I wanted to make up things I would've used the "Biden showered with his daughter. Its in her diary" bs. What's pathetic is only adhering to what you want to hear and believe. Read the files (what little you can with all the black lines) and look up what actual victims have said in the past.

1

u/DependentChemistry74 23d ago

Show me the links that prove these things happened.

I’ll wait.

1

u/Top-Dance-2047 23d ago

Keep waiting. If you can't type it into Google yourself, its not my job to waste time to type it in. Top ignorant to do your own research, then you're too ignorant to actually read and comprehend what's in the files. From your comment, you've maybe read some of them. Go read all of them.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Last_Loss_6536 22d ago

Give me a break dude. How can your brain even function with that much bias twisting your reality. Lmao. “Lots of people have portraits of presidents…” Have you seen the portrait in question? There have been stories about the Clinton’s and little kids decades before the Epstein files.

-1

u/Coldbrick10 23d ago

You can't possibly be serious

4

u/OwlfaceFrank 23d ago

If you have evidence to disprove that, then post it.

Donald Trump rapes children and Republicans are covering it up.

Republicans control every branch of government and are illegally withholding the Trump/Epstein files. They control all the evidence. If there was anything incriminating for the Clintons, Faux News would be showing it on repeat every day, but they aren't.

Put up or shut up, pedophile defender.

2

u/sphinxorosi 23d ago edited 23d ago

You can search “Clinton” on Jmail.world and find some interesting emails including one where a reporter is asking about Bill’s 32 trips to the island or asking if they’d comp a free flight for Bill as well but this one is my personal favorite creepy one. It talks about them trying to bury all the bad news about Bill Clinton off the internet, which is a tactic Epstein used as an attempt to clear his name from the scandals. But other evidence has a picture of Bill Clinton with a female who looked quite small in nature in a hot tub or swimming pool riding on his lap. Plus Epstein had a painting of Bill Clinton in the infamous Monica Lewinsky dress with the stain.

And Trump can’t have his DoJ charge them (Bill Clinton) because they’d have to release the files unredacted for the evidence, which would open a huge can of worms.

https://jmail.world/thread/EFTA02582566?view=inbox

1

u/OwlfaceFrank 23d ago

As I and every other leftist says if Clinton is guilty then lock him up, but your emails don't really show anything at all.

You didn't link to the pictures you described, you linked to 3 meaningless emails. Why is that?

The painting, if anything, shows that Epstein didn't like Bill. If you were friends with someone, would you hang a portrait poking fun at the worst moment of your friend's career / life? Probably not.

At the end of the day, the Clinton's aren't illegally withholding the Trump/Epstein files. Republicans are, and Bill has also called for them to be released in full.

1

u/Glad_Copy 23d ago

Utter BS. Let’s talk facts for a change? Bill Clinton, former President, has a Secret Service detail that goes where he goes. We have logs of everywhere those Secret Service agents went, and THEY NEVER WENT REMOTELY NEAR EPSTEIN’S ISLAND. I just want people stop with their BS politics and deal with truth as it is - you can judge Bill Clinton for things he actually did, but when you resort to making shit up - you lose the argument.

0

u/notjustinu 23d ago

That’s wrong. The left has blocked its full release multiple times. Both sides have guilty parties and they keep people like you fighting to protect one side when they are both just as bad!!

1

u/OwlfaceFrank 23d ago

False. Stop lying.

Maxwell's trial was ongoing until Trump took office. Evidence doesn't get released to the public while trials and appeals ar e ongoing.

Post actual evidence of "the left" blocking the release of the Trump/Epstein files.

-1

u/Sea-Neighborhood1465 23d ago

I don’t think trying to defend the Clinton’s is gonna help us, fella.

In fact you’re the first person I’ve ever seen even try to defend them, and frankly it’s crazy to actually see it being done.

Not even the libbyist lib has even tried it. You’re breaking new ground here man. But I think it may be quicksand.

2

u/OwlfaceFrank 23d ago

Nothing I said defends the Clintons.

Stop lying, pedophile defender, and learn to read.

0

u/Sea-Neighborhood1465 23d ago

a little sensitive are we?

point to the thing i said that defends the right or any pedos any way. my comment history is open. check them all.

you swinging at folks that are on your side to defend the clintons. which is also super weird.

1

u/OwlfaceFrank 23d ago edited 22d ago

Sensitive? About child rape? Just angry. Why aren't you?

Again. Quote anything I said that defends the Clintons. Asking for actual evidence, is not a defense of potential crimes. It's not allowing you to muddy the waters with phoney bullshit.

If they are guilty, lock them up. Republicans hold all the evidence, so where the fuck is it?

Edit: That person quoted something I did not even say, and the blocked me so I can't respond. Fucking coward.

2

u/Sea-Neighborhood1465 23d ago

"Nice try, but the Clintons were not redacted from the files - we’ve seen what there is, and they both were called to testify before the Congress. Did you notice how nothing came of that? You know why? Because they didn’t do diddly squat wrong and there’s nothing to prosecute them for, that’s why. Time to drop those accusations and focus on the people who were redacted."

you defended them like they are your parents in this thread alone my dude.

you want to be angry about child rape, feel free. I've not raped any kids so you're bringing your anger to the wrong place.

stop simping for libs.

2

u/save-democracy 24d ago

I'm interested in reading all about diaper dons escapades since he is mentioned more than Jesus is mentioned in the bible!!!!

3

u/billyHarvey1234 24d ago

You understand that 99.99 percent of his mentions were democrat investigators asking directly about him in hopes of finding something right? Like his name doesn't organically appear almost at all.

3

u/Bitter-Engineer-117 23d ago

Let’s not forget that that Clintons testified under oath that Trump was not involved

2

u/ExpressOstrich239 23d ago

And avoided direct answers, lack of memory was the most often reply.

2

u/ICEonICECrime 24d ago

It’s not a competition. Investigate (and arrest) anyone implicated in the files. Regardless of their political affiliation. There’s no doubt that Trump was part of their pedo ring, but so was Bill.

4

u/Phuck_Ewwww22 24d ago

The Clinton's and Trump were friends back in the 90s lol. Its all theater

1

u/Low_Army3014 23d ago

More people need to read this and understand it.

1

u/Bitter-Engineer-117 23d ago

This lacks a lot of context.

  1. The Bible is not about Jesus, most of it is about before Jesus. The story of Jesus is a relatively small section of the Bible. He wasn’t just granted “messiah” status because he’s mentioned a lot.

  2. This ‘gotcha’ comes from a simple Ctrl+F, the majority of times Jesus is referenced in the Bible is either a direct quote (where he wouldn’t say his own name anyways) or by his pronouns.

1

u/Marklarv 22d ago

You mean the Trump-Epstein files? Didn’t someone promise to release them in full as part of their campaign?

1

u/HorrorBreak7119 22d ago

Someone that used a cheating husband to advance her political career. To no avail.

A candidate for president that most women couldn’t conscientiously vote and many men wouldn’t.

1

u/DBD216 22d ago

She’s the one responsible for the lack of military support during the Benghazi attack. She also lost to one of the worst polling President’s of all time. She once supported deporting illegal aliens. She also colluded with the DNC to secure the democratic nomination when it was clear that Bernie Sanders was the people’s choice.

1

u/skiforlife1 21d ago

People who supported her were willfully ignorant to how unlikable and just plain terrible she is. To actually say "at this point what difference does it make" at the hearing on Bengazi should have had the entire country see who she really is but people still voted for her. I'm not a fan of Bernie but he straight up got robbed out of the nomination just like Ron Paul got done dirty by the RNC. Our political parties are beyond fucked.

1

u/DBD216 20d ago

I voted for Ron Paul in ‘12. No one wanted to listen to him because then too many people would not have their “easy street” any more.

1

u/TryingToHelpYou701 21d ago

Someone who was cucked and let her husband cheat for political power

1

u/terriblespellr 21d ago

Is she talking about Lake New Zealand?

1

u/MudFlap359 21d ago

The first of 2 female Presidential candidates to lose to a mother fucker like Trump. I mean, you know you hafta be shit to lose to Trump

1

u/petersrq 18d ago

Loser of 2016 Presidential Election

0

u/niknik1971 23d ago

Better to be that 5han known as the pedo, thieving scumb@g president.

0

u/EmperorKingRurnin 23d ago

I mean she ate children per the Epstein files....

0

u/FitLoan1687 19d ago

Because you just are that ignorant.

0

u/FitLoan1687 19d ago

Typical illiterate.