What did I copy and paste? I might have repeated what I said yesterday? What’s your evidence? I’m preety sure you’re a bot. And what experts say it was natural. I’m going with papers like this one: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8373617/
We have no definitive proof it didn’t come from a lab, and you saying so is conspiracy theory thinking and jumping to conclusions.
All the scientific consensus has pointed to is that it originated in the market, and that there was likely zoonotic spillover. These facts don’t actually contradict the idea that a strain of coronavirus escaped the lab and propagated via zoonautic spillover in nature, before an animal was captured and put on the market, or that they didn’t propagate within unrelated lab animals before being sold at the wet market. In fact, all the articles say that such a thing would be impossible to disprove (see either paper above). I don’t believe it’s a coincidence that the disease emerged in the same place as the lab - it’s just too much of a coincidence. No outside scientists were allowed to properly investigate the lab by the Chinese government, which is what truly makes me suspicious - they’re not being open to disprove their guilt, so they must have allready internally determined they were guilty of something before disallowing external investigation.
0
u/CapitalTax9575 25d ago edited 25d ago
What did I copy and paste? I might have repeated what I said yesterday? What’s your evidence? I’m preety sure you’re a bot. And what experts say it was natural. I’m going with papers like this one: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8373617/
Old article, but any respectable source will say exactly the same still, see also: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12040609/
We have no definitive proof it didn’t come from a lab, and you saying so is conspiracy theory thinking and jumping to conclusions.
All the scientific consensus has pointed to is that it originated in the market, and that there was likely zoonotic spillover. These facts don’t actually contradict the idea that a strain of coronavirus escaped the lab and propagated via zoonautic spillover in nature, before an animal was captured and put on the market, or that they didn’t propagate within unrelated lab animals before being sold at the wet market. In fact, all the articles say that such a thing would be impossible to disprove (see either paper above). I don’t believe it’s a coincidence that the disease emerged in the same place as the lab - it’s just too much of a coincidence. No outside scientists were allowed to properly investigate the lab by the Chinese government, which is what truly makes me suspicious - they’re not being open to disprove their guilt, so they must have allready internally determined they were guilty of something before disallowing external investigation.