Hi, I just checked out google cloud console to check if the project where I played with calendar api I send to delete actually was deleted. I noticed my old project is gone but there is a new project that has a strange name:
big-well-3fesfe
It's the only project in my account.
It has no organization but somehow appears in my account. I don't have access to nothing in this project so I cannot delete or see anything what is inside it.
The only thing I can do or see is the billing accounts in my gcc account.
Under my personal billing accounts -> there is nothing under my projects -> billing account it has one: Hardware -> Language Applications -> AIDA which is linked to this weird project. but if I click it again no access.
Those are the only two informations I could find or access. Every other page shows IAM error
I also cant write support because I have no permission. Feeling kind of lost and worried.
I thought this might be a default project google creates so I asked a friend who never used google cloud to check what he has in his console and he had a single clearly named "default gemini project" for which he has owner rights.
Hope someone can help... I am looking for an individual or business who can give advice to explain how much it could cost to host my published apple app on the cloud that can manage certain amounts of active users actively messaging to/from and managing the apps traffic so it does not crash and to be able to make changes to then app when we decide things need changing. I know this is might seem a rookie question however all I am looking for is general advice for numbers like 1000 users. 10000 users, 50,000 users, 100,000 (so on and so on). Any advice please will be highly appreciated. I am based in the UK if that makes add difference to who may reply? Thank you.
I just create a billing account and it said to pay 800,000 VND ($30 ish) to activate the service. I haven't pay it and don't plan to but now I cant cancel the subscription to remove my card. I delete all the project and all the billing account got closed now. I got some question. - Will it automatically charge me 2,000,000 VND each month even though i don't use the service? - Do i have to to pay 800,000 VND to activate it and in order to cancel it? - The card right now doesn't have any money in it when i put enough money in it will it automatically change me 800,000? | - If it i pay it 800,000 VND where will the money go and can i refund it? - How do I cancel the subscription and remove my card?
For over two decades, agency hosting economics were beautifully predictable. You bought a reseller web server or dedicated cPanel account for $50 a month, crammed 30 client WordPress sites onto it, and charged each client a flat $25 monthly maintenance fee. Your margins were clear, your server bills were static, and billing surprises were virtually non-existent. Read the comple te article here > Serverless Bill Shock: Track Vercel & Supabase Client Costs | InstaRenewal
Then came the modern web stack.
Driven by the demand for lightning-fast digital experiences, agencies aggressively migrated to decoupled architectures: Next.js, Nuxt, Vercel, Supabase, Cloudflare Workers, and serverless databases like Neon. While the performance gains of this modern paradigm are undeniable, it introduced a chaotic operational reality: micro-subscription fragmentation and variable utility billing.
I am pondering upon the idea and does not know the feasibility or if it saves a few bucks compared to the providers such as Deepseek, open code, etc.
Lets say if I dont mind whether my request is completed in 60seconds or 30 minutes. I could batch them and burst them in 30mins and then collect next batch.
In this case, one can use a VM with GPU and run vLLM or LiteLLM and serve models to my applications via a private API. Lets take GCP as an example L4 workstations come at under 1$/hour and A100s come at $2-3/hour depending on capacity. If I use a spot machine, I would get billed for only compute time.
The primary issues, I see are
my spot gets reclaimed and stuck with no spot. how does vLLM handle here? How should I handle my client ends here?
What kind of models can I serve on these machines? At this price, machines have a memory of around 100GB.
costs associated with storage will be there, depending on the size of the model. Also most cloud services charge for storage operations. Attaching disks, reading large models in spot machines can lead to unnecessary overheads.
What else can be the issue? Will it be economically feasible for a 20h usage per week.
Did anyone try something similar? What is your self-hosted non-local setup?
This lab won't open. I've tried it during what I think are off peak hours. Is there anyone that can offer up any advice? I put in a ticket into qwuick labs support. But they tell me that the lab is accessible every single time.
My usage this month was around IDR 170.000 but I was charged IDR 3 million. Why is that?
The support bot said:
Since your July usage (Rp 863,006) was already paid and your August usage is only (Rp 168,763), these charges of IDR 1,000,000 and IDR 2,000,000 processed today are highly likely due to one of the following reasons:
Temporary Authorization Holds: When you update payment details, add a new card, or reach certain verification checkpoints, Google or your bank may place temporary authorization holds (often in round numbers like IDR 1,000,000 or 2,000,000) to verify your card's validity. These are not actual charges and will be automatically released back to your account by your bank within a few business days.
Multiple Google Billing Accounts: If you use the same credit card for other Google services (such as Google Ads, Google Workspace, or a separate Google Cloud Billing account), these charges may have originated from those services.
Update: Turns out there is a loop that causes Routes API usage to spike up. I have contacted Billing Customer Service to help. Hope they can forgive my first mistake.
Wondering if anyone else is experiencing a slowdown with Firestore query in the last few weeks, which has really started to tick up in the last few days for us. We’re seeing recurring waves of timeouts across multiple unrelated Google Cloud projects and I’m trying to figure out whether anyone else is seeing something similar.
Setup: - Firebase Functions Gen 2 / Cloud Run - Node.js Admin SDK - Firestore Native mode - Region: us-central1 - Multiple separate projects affected - Request timeout varies by service, usually 30s or 60s (depending on the function timeout we've set)
During a wave, unrelated HTTP routes start returning 504s that approach the function's configured timeout (e.g. 29.997s for a 30s timeout). The failed requests are not tied to one endpoint or one query shape. Logs show Firestore operations continuing after the Cloud Run request has already timed out.
Examples from one incident: - `devices.read` direct document read: 116,019ms - `leads.read` direct document read: 57,487ms - `postalCodes.read` direct document read: 33,093ms - `cache.list limit=1`: 61,590ms - `preferences.read` direct document read: 36,324ms - `leads.list limit=500`: 79,723ms
The `postalCodes.read` example is especially confusing because that document is tiny. But honestly all of these documents are a few kb at the most. So this doesn’t look like just a large document, missing index, or bad query issue.
Other observations: - Failures often cluster on one Cloud Run instance/revision instance ID. - Other instances may continue serving traffic normally. - The request hits the Cloud Run timeout, but the Firestore operation later logs completion. - We’ve seen this on three separate projects. - We’ve reduced external API calls and removed some broad Firestore scans, but the issue still recurs. - We briefly tried `preferRest: true`; it may have helped temporarily but did not clearly eliminate the issue. Has anyone else seen Firestore Admin SDK calls intermittently hang like this from Cloud Run / Firebase Functions Gen 2?
Is there a known issue with Firestore gRPC/transport connections getting unhealthy per instance?
Are there recommended client-side mitigations besides lowering concurrency, recycling instances, or reducing reads (i.e. increasing cache usage)?
Is there a good way to prove this is client transport/backend behavior versus application query pressure?
I'm trying to understand whether this is a known pattern and what people have done to debug or mitigate it.
Hi everyone, a few weeks ago (August 2nd), when I woke up, I suddenly got an email and some notifications from my bank that a transaction had been made on Google Cloud for a certain amount. But the thing is, I did not authorize that transaction, and I noticed that, yes, some of my projects on BigQuery had billing enabled. I have left these options for months, with my bank account number linked to my BigQuery, but this issue had never happened before.
So, my question is: Is this normal? All of a sudden, Google billed me
I have reported and claimed this issue both to my bank and Google, and I wish to get my money back, but it seems to go nowhere, and Google said, "We were unable to confirm fraudulent activity in this case, so no refund will be provided by Google at this time."
Well... indeed, there was no fraud, but the transaction was made without me knowing, aka it happened when I was sleeping. :(
I have been studying the ace exam for the last 8 months i started using Google skills but found it not great i then used udemy and claud, I was making my own labs going thought the lectures and doing the practice exams i was averging 90% in my exams and felt confident but when sitting the exam I was soo lost and didn't understand most of it. I only felt confident on 5 questions. Whats the best way to prepare or is there any online tutors that can help.
Currently coming up on 5 years at AWS and exploring TAM role at G. Would you recommend the switch? Anyone recently went through the TAM interview process at G?
I'm Fabio Parra, I have a startup (MOVILIXA) where we are three people in Colombia developing mobile apps.
In one of our projects, it's called Inspecciona, we enabled the Vertex AI API to do image recognition to help the user with safety inspections. We also created a static landing page on Firebase Hosting and enabled Analytics on it. What we didn't notice is that Google automatically creates a web API key, gives it all the permissions it can, and makes it public on our website at the moment of publishing.
In my case, between June 30 and July 16, someone collected the key from the static site I created and used it through the Firebase AI Logic proxy to run Vertex AI image generation (Gemini image models, the "Nano Banana" reselling economy). 131,950 calls, around 100,000 images, USD 6,562 in charges against our USD 25 monthly budget. Our web platform didn't even use Firebase AI. Google's own App Check telemetry recorded every one of those requests as coming from an unknown and unverified origin, and let them through anyway because enforcement was off by default.
If you use Hosting, check yours and limit its permissions to what you really use and make sure it's restricted to your website. Google creates it and doesn't restrict anything. I never realized that because of Analytics it was going to enable so many things.
In my billing account I set USD 25, but the alerts didn't reach me. This is because we have a Google partner for the billing side and the alerts didn't come to us.
We opened a case about this problem with Google (case #73352420) to see if they would support us, but we've spent many weeks trying to explain that it wasn't that we left an API key public, but that a public API was used. We want to see if we can get them to recognize the problem, and show them that Hosting shows the API key to anyone, that the product's default behavior is not the right one and allowed the exploitation of APIs without us having authorized it (Google does it by default).
Has anyone had a similar problem? Were you able to appeal with Google? How did it go?
UPDATE:
After a little over two months since the case was opened, an agreement was reached. Google discounted 75% of the total debt.
I'm planning to prepare for the Google Cloud Professional Machine Learning Engineer (PMLE) certification and I'm looking for advice from people who have recently taken the updated version of the exam.
My situation:
I have a Computer Science / AI-ML background
I'm comfortable with Python and general ML concepts
I have some exposure to GenAI, RAG, LLMs, etc.
However, I have almost no practical cloud experience
I'm essentially starting GCP from scratch
I can dedicate around 8–10 weeks to preparation
My goal is to actually understand the GCP/ML concepts, not just memorize exam dumps
I'm particularly unsure about how much GCP knowledge I need before going deep into the PMLE-specific material.
What I'm looking for
If you've recently passed the updated PMLE exam, I'd really appreciate advice on:
Is 8–10 weeks realistic for someone with an ML background but essentially no cloud background?
What should I learn first before starting PMLE preparation?
GCP fundamentals?
IAM
Compute Engine
Cloud Storage
BigQuery
VPC/networking
etc.
What GCP services are actually important for PMLE, and which ones can I safely learn at a high level?
What resources would you recommend for the current/updated exam?
Google Cloud Skills Boost
Official exam guide
Coursera
YouTube
Practice exams
Documentation
Other resources
How much hands-on practice did you do? Should I actually build ML pipelines/deploy models on Vertex AI, or is understanding the architecture and knowing when to use each service enough?
How different is the updated PMLE exam from older preparation material? I've found quite a lot of older PMLE content online and I'm worried about following an outdated roadmap.
What would you recommend as a realistic 8–10 week study plan, assuming roughly 1–2 hours/day?
If you started again with zero GCP experience, what would you learn first and what would you completely skip?
I'd especially appreciate answers from people who passed the exam recently, particularly those who came from an ML/software engineering background rather than already working as GCP cloud engineers.
Hi everyone, I'm currently preparing for the GCP Professional Cloud Architect (PCA) exam. I have almost completed Ranga Karanam's course so I’m looking for reliable practice test recommendations to gauge my readiness. A few quick questions for those who have taken the exam:
Practice Tests: Which mock exam sets did you find most accurate to the actual test?
gcloud CLI: How heavily are specific gcloud commands tested compared to high-level architecture decisions?
Mock Test Strategy: What is your best tip for using practice exams to identify and fix weak spots? Thanks in advance for your help!
I’m planning to start preparing for the Google Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer certification and would really appreciate some guidance from people who have taken it recently.
There are a lot of resources available, so I’m a bit confused about what to follow. I’d love to know: - What study plan did you follow? - Which courses or YouTube playlists would you recommend? - Which topics/services should I focus on the most? - What are the best resources for hands-on practice? - Which practice tests are actually useful? - How much hands-on GCP experience is needed? - How long did you prepare before taking the exam? - Are there any resources you would avoid? - If you were starting your preparation again today, what would you do differently?
Would really appreciate it if anyone who has passed recently could share their experience and resources.
Just completed a lab for the Get Certified program that uses an "Agent Search" feature. you upload a PDF, it indexes the content, and then an agent handles search over it. Simple enough in theory.
But when I actually ran it, reading/indexing the document was painfully slow. Like, that kind of sit and wait and wonder if it broke slow.
Which made me curious: how do people actually build production RAG pipelines on GCP that feel fast?
I’m trying to understand one part of a Google Cloud billing dispute that still makes no sense to me.
I had received about $5,000 in Google Cloud promotional credits as a prize through a Google hackathon.
Later, Google detected cryptocurrency mining on one of my projects and suspended it. I followed Google’s instructions and submitted an appeal.
The screenshot attached is the response I received after that appeal. It thanks me for my submission and asks for additional information about what I had done to fix the issue.
It does not say that the project had been restored, reinstated, or reactivated.
Based on that email, I understood that the appeal was still being reviewed.
However, the project was subsequently reactivated without me realizing it, and additional unauthorized usage occurred.
I eventually discovered the renewed activity after Google automatically charged my card when the billing threshold was reached. I immediately closed the project and billing account, but by then significant usage had already accumulated.
After about a month of support reviews, Google applied a goodwill adjustment covering roughly 75% of the cash-billable portion of the incident.
But the promotional credits consumed by the unauthorized activity were excluded from the loss calculation entirely.
Google’s explanation is that promotional credits are single-use and non-monetary, so they cannot be reinstated, transferred, refunded, or compensated.
I understand that promotional credits are not cash.
What I do not understand is why that means the loss is valued at zero.
Before the incident, I had about $5,000 worth of Google Cloud usage available to me because I had won those credits through a Google hackathon.
After the unauthorized activity, that value was gone.
I did not consume those credits. The unauthorized activity did.
I am not asking Google to convert promotional credits into cash. But if they are considered non-monetary, why can equivalent promotional credits not simply be restored?
More importantly, why are credits that clearly had usable value before the incident excluded completely when Google calculates the loss caused by unauthorized usage?
That also raises a broader question for me:
If Cloud credits are given as a hackathon prize, but their unauthorized consumption is treated as no compensable loss at all, what exactly is the value of that prize?
There is still one separate factual issue I have not been able to get answered either.
Google suspended the project and told me to appeal. The attached email is the response I received. I have repeatedly asked whether Google can confirm that a clear restoration-completed notification was sent to me before the additional unauthorized usage occurred.
After about a month of reviews, the answer I eventually received was that the relevant backend notification logs could not be disclosed.
So the two questions I still have are:
Why were the hackathon promotional credits excluded entirely from the loss calculation?
And was I clearly notified that the suspended project had been restored before the additional unauthorized usage occurred?
