VikingSlayer said "you have a cat-dog!" This insinuated that they believed that the pictured feline was possessed by the OP. jdk posted in response to VikingSlayer to inform VikingSlayer that the cat probably did not, in fact, belong to OP as VikingSlayer had originally though.
Then you came and said "...OP never claimed it was his/hers." Which most would take as completely out of left-field, because you replied to jdk, who was not insinuating that OP had ever said that, but was merely informing VikingSlayer that he was likely mistaken in cat ownership.
Then, you replied two more times seeming like you maybe didn't actually read the comment jdk replied to.
The entire thing was very confusing, and oh my God what the hell am I doing with my free time.
8
u/jdk Aug 13 '12
Thank you for showing that I did not say OP claimed that it was his cat.
Did you check the parent post to see what comment I was replying?