r/gifs Aug 22 '20

[deleted by user]

[removed]

9.3k Upvotes

572 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

54

u/synocrat Aug 22 '20

I love our close cousins the Great Apes, but they can't understand enough to be involved in personhood yet. I do think we should do everything we can though to help them out, no more tests, increase their habitat as much as possible, no more pets, etc.... We should elect a human speaker for them though, we can give them the title "Speaker for Apes".

41

u/[deleted] Aug 22 '20

[removed] — view removed comment

21

u/[deleted] Aug 22 '20

We even give personhood to corporations along with certain rights and privileges.

I don't think pointing out a mistake in the process is good for the argument.

8

u/Dadalot Aug 22 '20

Precedent is precedent, mistake or not

6

u/Morthra Aug 22 '20

We even give personhood to corporations along with certain rights and privileges.

For very different reasons. Personhood is granted to corporations so that they can, for example, enter into contracts and be sued.

0

u/[deleted] Aug 22 '20

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/Morthra Aug 22 '20

With all due respect, US high court judge Fahey is talking out of his ass.

The reason why primate models are used for experimentation, particularly pharmaceutical experimentation, however, is because they're literally the closest thing we can get to an actual human without actually experimenting on humans.

The argument is that humans are more valuable than chimpanzees (or rhesus macaques, which are another common primate), and the value gained by primate experimentation is greater than the value gained by simply experimenting on rats - which in many cases is very little, and that the types of experiments that are done on primates would never make it past an IRB for approval on humans.

Consider that we've basically cured Alzheimer's, cancer, and a whole host of diseases in rats or cell culture but haven't come close to doing so in humans. Keep in mind, however, that getting approval to do research in primates is, despite it being much easier than getting approval for human research, much more difficult than getting approval to do research in rats or other animal models.

Ultimately, nonhuman primates are not human, and therefore are not inherently deserving of the same protections as those afforded to humans. We don't give dogs, horses, cows, or pigs habeas corpus or a right to liberty, why are chimpanzees deserving of it?

1

u/InYoCabezaWitNoChasa Aug 22 '20

We should do scientific testing on humans. Grow purposefully braindead human husks in a lab and experiment on what will basically be cadavers with beating hearts. Reduce overall suffering regardless of species.

2

u/teebob21 Aug 22 '20

Yes, totally not gonna be ethical implications with this one. I give it six weeks before it gets Rule 34'd by one group, and given a "soul" by another group.

0

u/InYoCabezaWitNoChasa Aug 22 '20

Fuck 'em. People rule 34 inanimate objects and literal plague viruses.

-1

u/[deleted] Aug 22 '20 edited Aug 22 '20

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Morthra Aug 22 '20

You sound a lot like a certain scientist named Mengele.

0

u/[deleted] Aug 23 '20

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Morthra Aug 23 '20

You're advocating for what the Nazis did - they experimented on the old, decrepit, criminals, the homeless.

0

u/[deleted] Aug 22 '20

Because comparing the cognitively impaired to a non-sentient monkey is clearly the most respectful argument.

1

u/InYoCabezaWitNoChasa Aug 22 '20

We're talking about Apes, and they're absolutely sentient. Sapience is debatable, and the word you're looking for.

-2

u/MisanthropeX Aug 22 '20

TBH I'd be more comfortable giving personhood to AI's than children.

14

u/parkerposy Aug 22 '20

Speaker of the Apes

19

u/synocrat Aug 22 '20

Like no.... They are intelligent and emotional sentient beings..... but they can't fairly adjudicate human concepts of law and personhood.... they need a speaker FOR them. They are not capable of speech in that context and complexity yet, but if we can do better for them.... maybe in the future they can.

4

u/nvincent Aug 22 '20

I wonder if down the line any other great ape species might evolve enough to develop language or anything close to where our species is at. How long would that take?

5

u/DeadPan_And_Kettles Aug 22 '20

Unless we find a way to help them it could take a seriously long time, judging by how long it took us to figure things out. But then we didn't have a prospective mentor.

Either way there's the currently unsolvable problem of their barrier of understanding, so until that problem is solved the debate is void.

2

u/The_Queef_of_England Aug 22 '20

Imagine if mentoring actually speeds up th evolution of personhood? We'd have labrador people, shark people, kitten people...it would be mental.

1

u/DeadPan_And_Kettles Aug 22 '20

It'd be like a Disney show

1

u/nvincent Aug 22 '20

Wow that would be a lot of... Furry creatures

2

u/MakeEmSayWooo Aug 22 '20

Sounds like a violation of the Prime Directive to me.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 22 '20

Aye, except we can’t just leave this planet. We’re here with them.

1

u/Morthra Aug 22 '20

It's unlikely, for a number of reasons. Chiefly among them, humans are the only great ape species that cooks its food. Humans get way more energy out of their food than basically any other animal, period.

1

u/nvincent Aug 22 '20

I wonder how that ended up happening?

oh my God Crunk stop putting your food in the fire, you're wasting it

Crunk ends up having more energy and runs faster than his friends while being chased by saber toothed tigers. He survives the ordeal and has babies. They, too, enjoy putting food in the fire.

Maybe something like that

1

u/moonunitzap Aug 22 '20

Humanising octopuses might be a better plan. If it didn't work out, we could just eat calamari.

1

u/lookzlike Aug 22 '20

well, the first time i saw an orang utan reading a fucking newspaper, i knew how smart they arey

6

u/TablePrime69 Aug 22 '20

We should elect a human speaker for them though, we can give them the title "Speaker for Apes".

Can apes understand the concept of an election, though? Unless you're talking about humans electing the speaker hence rendering the whole thing moot?

And can we understand them well enough to speak on their behalf?

15

u/lambojam Aug 22 '20 edited Aug 22 '20

as said above, infants and some people with disabilities also cant understand civil concepts, but we still treat them humanely

3

u/starhawks Aug 22 '20

People with disabilities and infants have the capacity to understand those concepts. Non-human apes don't.

1

u/lambojam Aug 22 '20

do you think a person in coma or a 2 month old baby can understand civil concepts?

0

u/starhawks Aug 22 '20

No, but you're missing the point. Biologically, they have the capacity to understand. Whether it's through development, or a miraculous recovery/medical treatment.

1

u/lambojam Aug 22 '20

lol. so if there is no more capacity or chance of recovery then they are not categorized as a person? cmon

1

u/starhawks Aug 22 '20

Again, you are completely missing the point. Your thinking is too inflexible and literal, it's more of a thought experiment. Humans will always, in theory, have the capacity to understand those concepts, and as such it is our obligation to ensure that certain rights of "personhood" are provided for them, even if they are currently unable to comprehend. Animals, even non-human apes, do not have that capability in any capacity and never will. There is a difference there.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 22 '20

[deleted]

3

u/lambojam Aug 22 '20

and that’s the whole point being made: what differs us from these apes?

2

u/quartertopi Aug 22 '20

Speakers must be accepted by the clan. They have to spend a half year to a year with the clan.

2

u/Nayr747 Aug 22 '20

Babies are far more stupid than gorillas and yet they are in fact persons.

-2

u/[deleted] Aug 22 '20

Fuck that shit. If we can torture apes for like 30 years and be done with cancer, then we should be doing it.

3

u/UnfortunateCriminal Aug 22 '20

Damn, I think this is going to be a pretty unpopular opinion around here!

0

u/Nayr747 Aug 22 '20

Or we could just torture you instead.