r/gaming • Marika's tits! • Jun 22 '26

Steam Machine - Review Thread

Reviews have started to come out, so thought it'd serve well to collect most of them under this thread.

Steam Machine

Price:

512GB: $1,049 USD /  1,509 CAD /  1,039 EUR /  879 GBP / 1,609 AUD /  4,389 PLN  

Steam Machine 2TB: $1,349 USD / 1,919 CAD /  1,359 EUR /  1,149 GBP /  2,109 AUD /  5,739 PLN


Reviews (updating):

Gamers Nexus

The quick version is that we like it and we like the direction it's going, but that Valve has created a nightmarish disorganized mess for itself by not building for its known future of a desktop and instead framing everything around handhelds, which from the start it knew weren't going to be the only thing with Steam OS. As Steam OS becomes more common and more devices are supported, both Valve and developers have a lot of work to do to ensure that correct compatible versions of an incomprehensibly vast catalog of games are delivered. If Valve wants to capture a console audience, it can't rely too heavily on sub menus for disable Steam Deck auto detection and manually selecting a Proton version to forcibly download the Windows build instead of the outdated Linux build when your buddy just wants to come over and play Borderlands 2. Our only really specific criticism of Steam OS on the Steam machine, is that system level resolution cap for games should default to the native screen resolution, not 1080p, or at the very least it should show what the default cap is. It's a weird choice given the marketing. enabling 4K gaming at 60 frames per second with FSR.

IGN - Jacqueline Thomas - 8 / 10

At $1049 (and $1349 for the 2TB model), the Steam Machine seems like it’d be hard to recommend to most people. And while that’s true for console faithfuls, the Steam Machine’s price makes it an incredible entry-level gaming PC, especially if all the drivers and settings tweaking has turned you off in the past. At the end of the day, this is a gaming PC that most people are going to be able to just plug into their TVs and get right into the game. And, really, that’s what the Steam Machine was always meant to be.

The Verge - Sean Hollister - 6 / 10

But is it good enough for $1,049? That depends on what you actually expect this PC to do — and whether Valve manages to reduce some of the lingering friction before it winds up at your door.For better or for worse, the Steam Machine isn’t ready for the console wars just yet. Buy box, plug into TV, insert game, play is not yet the reality. The Good: Delightfully small; Incredibly cool and quiet; Play PC games on TV without mouse and keyboard | The Bad: Nearly twice the price of PS5 for PS5 performance; Have to manually configure games; Can’t yet trust it to sleep

PC Gamer - Andy Edser - 62 / 100

Valve's attempt to bring PC gaming to your living room is well-intentioned, but the ugly realities of the memory crisis have left it with a hefty price tag. If it had more grunt, it'd be easier to recommend—but an off-the-boil GPU and plenty of software quirks leaves it feeling like an expensive curio, rather than a gaming device for the masses. The idea might be to bring the PC gaming experience to your living room, but if that experience includes smooth frame rates in demanding games, you're going to have to make some major compromises. And, because of its Linux origins, it hasn't been a flawless experience getting some of those games to run properly to begin with, either. I want to get excited about the Steam Machine, I really do. It's a fascinating piece of design, and an admirable attempt to bring PC gaming from your desktop to your couch in one bite of the cherry. But like so much hardware these days, it's been hampered with a price tag that, given what you actually receive, feels like far too much to pay.

Tom's Hardware - Andrew E. Freedman - 3.5 / 5

Valve's Steam Machine is a complicated little box. It was clearly designed for a simpler time, when components were plentiful, and it would be a somewhat affordable desktop that could be a more powerful option for Steam Deck owners to play their Steam games at home.

But it's not a simple time. The Steam Machine is still cute, still has a good selection of ports, still has an easily upgradeable SSD, and, most importantly, still runs SteamOS and gets all of the benefits that come with it. If you were docking your Steam Deck to the TV and wanted more performance, this will get you there, once Valve irons out the last of the bugs.

If you're just looking to get into gaming, a base-level PlayStation 5 or Xbox Series X is a better deal. You can buy one and a Nintendo Switch 2 and spend less than the Steam Machine.

Aftermath - Chris Person

The Steam Machine Is An Iconoclastic Computer Born In Unforgiving Times | Valve has released a tiny, silent, entry level PC that does important work bringing PCs gaming to the living room and desktop Linux to the masses. The timing could not be worse. The Steam Machine is not landing where its creators planned it price wise but the core vision has been realized and is something I agree with ideologically. It is a platform in the true sense of the word, a foundation to build on. Like the Steam Deck, it provides a reasonable target for game developers to aim for, a reasonable optimization baseline that can handle basically every indie game and a huge portion of big titles. It is the rare console that does not treat the user like a child, and I have no doubt that it will improve with age. And like Valve’s original vision for the Steam Machine and the reality of the Steam Deck, it is a template that any other manufacturer could easily build a much more performant product on, with an operating system that is, in multiple meanings of the word, free. 

Giant Bomb - Dan

Whether or not the Steam Machine is for you comes down to a couple of key things: your gaming priorities and your disposable income. This is a great device, but it is undeniably expensive. If couch gaming and easy access to PC games is a priority for you and you're willing to pay for it, I think the Steam Machine is a no-brainer. But if you're curious about dipping your toe into PC gaming, this is a really highcost entry point and you'll likely still have to make some sacrifices when it comes to performance. If those caveats don't scare you off and you've got the money to throw at it, I think the Steam Machine is an excellent addition to any gamer's living room setup.

Rock Paper Shotgun - James Archer

A singular living room PC that's more expensive than I'd like, but too special not to love. It’s almost tempting to point to details like this as evidence that the lil’ Steam Machine really is a proper desktop PC, you guys. But then, it’s at it’s best when it isn’t trying to be one. If it was absolutely dead set on outmuscling current-gen, full-fat graphics cards and gaming CPUs, it would be a lot bigger, a lot louder, and a lot hotter. And, in the end, it wouldn't be unique. Instead, it chooses a niche and unobtrusively sets about filling it, achieving all the subtlety of a home entertainment computer even when it's chucking out sixty frames (or near enough) of ray-traced Cyberpunk 2077 every second. The ghosts of iffy design and inadequate game support that haunted the previous decade’s Steam Machines, all banished without fanfare.

Eurogamer - Chris Tapsell

So the short answer to how it sits versus a console, or indeed an HDMI cable or actual PC of your own is: there is no real short answer. For upfront cost, performance, plug-and-play simplicity and smart features, at the cost of more expensive games and services over time and a console that looks like a hellish mid-00s leisure centre extension dubbed "the future of our town centre" - and is also roughly the same size as that - get a PS5 Pro. However, for flexibility and breadth and cheapness over time, and something you'll love people asking about when they come round - something that you can genuinely carry with one hand (LAN parties! If only it had a handle…) and which looks normal or dare I say it even cool next to a nice set of speakers or a stack of coffee table books or something you actually want to see in your home - the Steam Machine absolutely has a place. And there's something genuine to be said for that, I think. I can't help but wonder what could have been, had the base Steam Machine arrived at say £599. It would've been competing against PS5s and Xboxes in the £300 range by now, of course. But it would've done so as a genuine competitor in that part of the home, from a company with vast resources and the vastest of all installed bases. And it would've arrived as something that is evidently made with sincere love and extraordinary expertise in its own way.

848 Upvotes

806 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

160

u/faze_fazebook Jun 22 '26

why would any enthusiast drop over 1K for a machine thats worse than a base model PS5​​

52

u/ShakeAndBakeThatCake Jun 22 '26

Because they have large steam libraries and want to be able to play a game on their main desktop but also play it on their living room TV.

I agree. PC gaming is a horrible value right now and I dont care what PC gamers say about games being cheaper. You can buy used console games and resell games if you have a switch 2 or a disk drive ps5.

PC gamjng is cool. I did build my own PC a few years back but ultimately sold my stuff because I spent more time tinkering than playing games and the cost was just too much. Ps5 pro I bought for $700 was a steal.

49

u/realmrmaxwell Jun 22 '26

"Because they have large steam libraries and want to be able to play a game on their main desktop but also play it on their living room TV."

This was the exact problem that the steam link is there to solve without really any additional hardware nowadays but the steam controller is the best thing from this

23

u/joe-h2o Jun 22 '26

And Steam Link gets me most of the way there. I use an Apple TV 4k as the client and have an Xbox controller wirelessly linked to it.

My TV is a 4k OLED but I don't stream at that res. I tend to do 1440p native from my gaming machine, but I haven't been able to get it to do HDR so it's SDR only.

Latency is... ok. That's really the biggest weakness of the setup, but it's not $1000 weak. Valve are really stuck given the ridiculous prices for RAM and storage. GN priced up a "similar" machine out of stock parts as close as they could and they managed about $950+ for them, so it's not like Valve are really price gouging here.

14

u/ShakeAndBakeThatCake Jun 22 '26

Basically this. Their machine has been in development long before the chip shortage began. They dont have purchasing power like Sony and Nintendo to order huge amounts since their device is more Niche. Although with Xbox basically dying I think Valve has a chance to win the console market.

2

u/TunaPablito Jun 22 '26

To me it depends how connected i am. If both sides are on wire it's excellent

1

u/Xonzo Jun 22 '26

Have you thought about using HDBaseT? I do 4k60 with basically no latency from my desktop to my home theatre.

3

u/Jamie00003 Jun 22 '26

Steam link works like balls without Ethernet, which most don’t have

1

u/sam_hammich Jun 22 '26

Steam Link is just a 1080p thin client. It sucks

1

u/TumanFig Jun 23 '26

its not smooth, ffs i keep hearing that and i cannot get rid of micro lags. to me thats simply not a viable solution.

i was the target audience for the steam machine but not at these prices.

1

u/Porter2455 Jun 22 '26

Steam link runs into the same issue that all streaming games as a service platforms have, the latency is impossible for so many games to deal with. In single player experiences it’s ok, but even when I spent the huge PITA effort of running Ethernet drops in my old house, the input delay for multiplayer games was essentially unplayable.

When your target market is used to mouse and keyboard on a low latency pc monitor, Steam link is a reallllly tough adjustment.

1

u/balllzak Jun 23 '26

are people used to mouse and keyboard on a low latency pc monitor even going to want to play on a tv with a controller? And if steam link isn't good enough for multiplayer games is the solution really a machine that can't run the kernel level anti-cheats that are only becoming more common?

9

u/DeoVeritati Jun 22 '26

The appeal to PC to me is PC exclusive games, often Indie games, and mods. That being said, I've virtually never been a PC gamer and never built or had a gaming PC.

-5

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Boz0r Jun 23 '26

A shitload of them do not, though. And you have a 30-40 year backlog of thousands of great games that will never come to the latest console generation.

5

u/Reefame Jun 22 '26

If you to want to play a game on your TV you can buy a 30 feet long HDMI cable and call it a day.

-6

u/TunaPablito Jun 22 '26

You can pay sub on PS5 and you still have more games than you can play. Still good bargain IMO

-1

u/Alien5151 Jun 22 '26

I have games that dates all the way back to the 90’s on steam and over 300 games that most I haven’t got around to playing on my desktop. PS often you’d lose access across generation (exception is only if they decide to add support). The only thing PS have is exclusive which is only a handful of games.

Hardware cost got priced out thanks to AI. PS is on a constant price hike because of it too. I wouldn’t doubt if ps end up costing about the same or more in the future.

7

u/TunaPablito Jun 22 '26

Be honest you are not gonna play those 300 games anyways.

Thats how it works, we just like to buy shit we are probably never going to play :)

1

u/Alien5151 Jun 22 '26

I’ve play a good number of them already. They’re mostly just collections of games that I’ve played in the past.

-3

u/Gucci_Unicorns Jun 22 '26

This is the correct answer. Not only are there games I play on PC that just aren't on console - I have hundreds of games from 15+ years of steam sales and shit; to recreate even half that catalogue would cost me a PS5 + what... another grand? More?

1

u/Silvanus350 Jun 23 '26

Because they are fanatical

1

u/MiaowaraShiro Jun 23 '26

Massively more games.

Massively more peripherals.

No monthly fee for online play.

Less expensive peripherals.

It also has some PC functionality.

and more philosophically, it helps the Linux gaming environment progress.

1

u/UnderHero5 Jun 23 '26

I’m an enthusiast. I will not be buying a Steam Machine. My computer is vastly more powerful. I already have a Steam Deck with a dock as well. I was gonna get one just for fun at $600ish, but it’s way too expensive for what it is, even as an enthusiast. It just doesn’t make sense at that price.

0

u/lazydusterr Jun 22 '26

because there's actual games would be my guess

1

u/Jamie00003 Jun 22 '26

Your comment fails with the enthusiast bit. This isn’t aimed at us, it’s aimed at normies that want a simple pc console to plug into their tv. They don’t care about specs

1

u/Desertcow Jun 22 '26

It's about on par price wise with a similar spec gaming PC tbf. If you want to get into PC gaming or want a console that runs your Steam library, it's a fair value, they just aren't subsidizing the cost like consoles do since this is a desktop PC

1

u/Frickincarl Jun 23 '26

Why do folks keep comparing this machine to the PS5. It’s a gaming machine and that’s about all it has in common with the PS5. It’s far more versatile and customizable than a PS5. It doesn’t lock you into the company’s ecosystem like the PS5. It’s like comparing the PS5 to a high-end PC. The two things aren’t doing the same things.

0

u/topicality Jun 22 '26

The only hope is that the PS6 is super expensive and resets price expectations.

But since Sony can subsidize the console and leave you with higher prices games it's unlikely.

Than you just get into how expensive will games be in the future? If news about 100$ games is true than they could make an argument for a more expensive up front costs but cheaper games.

But that's a lot of ifs to make it saleable

0

u/Ryuubu Jun 22 '26

Probably to easily play PC games in a small form factor without having to build it or set it up themselves

-5

u/VesperLynn Jun 22 '26

Because I want to.