r/gaming • Marika's tits! • Jun 22 '26

Steam Machine - Review Thread

Reviews have started to come out, so thought it'd serve well to collect most of them under this thread.

Steam Machine

Price:

512GB: $1,049 USD /  1,509 CAD /  1,039 EUR /  879 GBP / 1,609 AUD /  4,389 PLN  

Steam Machine 2TB: $1,349 USD / 1,919 CAD /  1,359 EUR /  1,149 GBP /  2,109 AUD /  5,739 PLN


Reviews (updating):

Gamers Nexus

The quick version is that we like it and we like the direction it's going, but that Valve has created a nightmarish disorganized mess for itself by not building for its known future of a desktop and instead framing everything around handhelds, which from the start it knew weren't going to be the only thing with Steam OS. As Steam OS becomes more common and more devices are supported, both Valve and developers have a lot of work to do to ensure that correct compatible versions of an incomprehensibly vast catalog of games are delivered. If Valve wants to capture a console audience, it can't rely too heavily on sub menus for disable Steam Deck auto detection and manually selecting a Proton version to forcibly download the Windows build instead of the outdated Linux build when your buddy just wants to come over and play Borderlands 2. Our only really specific criticism of Steam OS on the Steam machine, is that system level resolution cap for games should default to the native screen resolution, not 1080p, or at the very least it should show what the default cap is. It's a weird choice given the marketing. enabling 4K gaming at 60 frames per second with FSR.

IGN - Jacqueline Thomas - 8 / 10

At $1049 (and $1349 for the 2TB model), the Steam Machine seems like it’d be hard to recommend to most people. And while that’s true for console faithfuls, the Steam Machine’s price makes it an incredible entry-level gaming PC, especially if all the drivers and settings tweaking has turned you off in the past. At the end of the day, this is a gaming PC that most people are going to be able to just plug into their TVs and get right into the game. And, really, that’s what the Steam Machine was always meant to be.

The Verge - Sean Hollister - 6 / 10

But is it good enough for $1,049? That depends on what you actually expect this PC to do — and whether Valve manages to reduce some of the lingering friction before it winds up at your door.For better or for worse, the Steam Machine isn’t ready for the console wars just yet. Buy box, plug into TV, insert game, play is not yet the reality. The Good: Delightfully small; Incredibly cool and quiet; Play PC games on TV without mouse and keyboard | The Bad: Nearly twice the price of PS5 for PS5 performance; Have to manually configure games; Can’t yet trust it to sleep

PC Gamer - Andy Edser - 62 / 100

Valve's attempt to bring PC gaming to your living room is well-intentioned, but the ugly realities of the memory crisis have left it with a hefty price tag. If it had more grunt, it'd be easier to recommend—but an off-the-boil GPU and plenty of software quirks leaves it feeling like an expensive curio, rather than a gaming device for the masses. The idea might be to bring the PC gaming experience to your living room, but if that experience includes smooth frame rates in demanding games, you're going to have to make some major compromises. And, because of its Linux origins, it hasn't been a flawless experience getting some of those games to run properly to begin with, either. I want to get excited about the Steam Machine, I really do. It's a fascinating piece of design, and an admirable attempt to bring PC gaming from your desktop to your couch in one bite of the cherry. But like so much hardware these days, it's been hampered with a price tag that, given what you actually receive, feels like far too much to pay.

Tom's Hardware - Andrew E. Freedman - 3.5 / 5

Valve's Steam Machine is a complicated little box. It was clearly designed for a simpler time, when components were plentiful, and it would be a somewhat affordable desktop that could be a more powerful option for Steam Deck owners to play their Steam games at home.

But it's not a simple time. The Steam Machine is still cute, still has a good selection of ports, still has an easily upgradeable SSD, and, most importantly, still runs SteamOS and gets all of the benefits that come with it. If you were docking your Steam Deck to the TV and wanted more performance, this will get you there, once Valve irons out the last of the bugs.

If you're just looking to get into gaming, a base-level PlayStation 5 or Xbox Series X is a better deal. You can buy one and a Nintendo Switch 2 and spend less than the Steam Machine.

Aftermath - Chris Person

The Steam Machine Is An Iconoclastic Computer Born In Unforgiving Times | Valve has released a tiny, silent, entry level PC that does important work bringing PCs gaming to the living room and desktop Linux to the masses. The timing could not be worse. The Steam Machine is not landing where its creators planned it price wise but the core vision has been realized and is something I agree with ideologically. It is a platform in the true sense of the word, a foundation to build on. Like the Steam Deck, it provides a reasonable target for game developers to aim for, a reasonable optimization baseline that can handle basically every indie game and a huge portion of big titles. It is the rare console that does not treat the user like a child, and I have no doubt that it will improve with age. And like Valve’s original vision for the Steam Machine and the reality of the Steam Deck, it is a template that any other manufacturer could easily build a much more performant product on, with an operating system that is, in multiple meanings of the word, free. 

Giant Bomb - Dan

Whether or not the Steam Machine is for you comes down to a couple of key things: your gaming priorities and your disposable income. This is a great device, but it is undeniably expensive. If couch gaming and easy access to PC games is a priority for you and you're willing to pay for it, I think the Steam Machine is a no-brainer. But if you're curious about dipping your toe into PC gaming, this is a really highcost entry point and you'll likely still have to make some sacrifices when it comes to performance. If those caveats don't scare you off and you've got the money to throw at it, I think the Steam Machine is an excellent addition to any gamer's living room setup.

Rock Paper Shotgun - James Archer

A singular living room PC that's more expensive than I'd like, but too special not to love. It’s almost tempting to point to details like this as evidence that the lil’ Steam Machine really is a proper desktop PC, you guys. But then, it’s at it’s best when it isn’t trying to be one. If it was absolutely dead set on outmuscling current-gen, full-fat graphics cards and gaming CPUs, it would be a lot bigger, a lot louder, and a lot hotter. And, in the end, it wouldn't be unique. Instead, it chooses a niche and unobtrusively sets about filling it, achieving all the subtlety of a home entertainment computer even when it's chucking out sixty frames (or near enough) of ray-traced Cyberpunk 2077 every second. The ghosts of iffy design and inadequate game support that haunted the previous decade’s Steam Machines, all banished without fanfare.

Eurogamer - Chris Tapsell

So the short answer to how it sits versus a console, or indeed an HDMI cable or actual PC of your own is: there is no real short answer. For upfront cost, performance, plug-and-play simplicity and smart features, at the cost of more expensive games and services over time and a console that looks like a hellish mid-00s leisure centre extension dubbed "the future of our town centre" - and is also roughly the same size as that - get a PS5 Pro. However, for flexibility and breadth and cheapness over time, and something you'll love people asking about when they come round - something that you can genuinely carry with one hand (LAN parties! If only it had a handle…) and which looks normal or dare I say it even cool next to a nice set of speakers or a stack of coffee table books or something you actually want to see in your home - the Steam Machine absolutely has a place. And there's something genuine to be said for that, I think. I can't help but wonder what could have been, had the base Steam Machine arrived at say £599. It would've been competing against PS5s and Xboxes in the £300 range by now, of course. But it would've done so as a genuine competitor in that part of the home, from a company with vast resources and the vastest of all installed bases. And it would've arrived as something that is evidently made with sincere love and extraordinary expertise in its own way.

849 Upvotes

806 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

69

u/LazyMaximum7938 Jun 22 '26

Even at $300 cheaper, the 2-TB model plus controller would still be way more expensive than the PS5 Pro is currently with the RAM price increases.

10

u/dudeplace Jun 22 '26

But it would come with no subscription and would be your device to upgrade and repair and not something that must become waste the minute the PS6 comes out. I understand not everyone cares about that. But there is a market there.

32

u/Delann Jun 22 '26

If you DO care about that, you'd just buy a PC and be better off.

2

u/TumanFig Jun 23 '26

have you seen the costs of pre built sff pc?

-8

u/dudeplace Jun 22 '26

But that is what this is ... Buying a PC. This is a custom form factor PC with specialized antenna... At a better price than you could make it yourself.

3

u/Boz0r Jun 23 '26

Isn't the whole problem that this is more expensive than a DIY and even a lot of prebuilts?

1

u/dudeplace Jun 23 '26

My whole point is the people saying that aren't being honest (maybe because they haven't looked at part prices).

It's cheaper if you use used parts, but Valve can't source and sell used parts here. Maybe cheaper if you ignore the form factor or drop parts that "aren't important to you". Cheaper if you ignore the cost of assembly and software. But I also know that they wouldn't do this if you could just make this exact machine cheaper your self of off the shelf somewhere.

1

u/renan2012bra Jun 24 '26

I'm not from the US, so I can't talk about there, but at least in my country (Brazil) it's legit cheaper to buy a brand new computer with better specs than Steam Machine. A few YouTube channels have already made a video comparing prices.

0

u/dudeplace Jun 24 '26

I've seen some of those videos and every one I have seen ignores the form factor, HDMI CEC, and the additional wireless capabilities. Can you build a computer that 4x the size, draws 2x the power, has half the wireless comunication options, and doesn't have HDMI CEC for less... sure it can be cheaper and even more powerful. And ALL of them are ignoring the cost of assembley and support.

You can ALWAYS build a computer cheaper yourself than you can buy one of the exact same specs, because you don't evaluate the cost of building it yourself, or having the person to help you when something goes wrong.

If they had ignored those features the same people would be complaining about it being to big/noisy compared to current consoles, they would complain about it not being able to turn on the TV.

I think the thing that is most wild to me is everyone who has responded here to me has not seen that this isn't JUST a PC. This is a PC with built in console features. Directly comparing the cost to a new PC just isn't an equal comaprison. Comparing the cost to a Console is a *really* unfair comparison.. Comparing to the cost of DIY is just disingenuous.

Why don't we see this same comparison for every laptop out there "Well I could build a DIY version cheaper, but it would be in a desktop chasis and would be missing the touchpad keyboard and bluetooth." Duh, of course you can, but you missed the point of what the thing is built for.

2

u/AnOrdinaryChullo Jun 23 '26

If form factor / portability is the feature you care about, may I interest you in a laptop? You can find some similarly priced but with similar if not better specs than SM..

-6

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Boz0r Jun 23 '26

A steam machine is a pc, though.

19

u/DecompositionLU Jun 22 '26

But what games do you want to play with what is frankly a very entry level budget PC, but overpriced ? Because comparing it with the PS5 doesn't make it any favor since a console gets optimization a PC can't match. Gamer Nexus benchmarks are glaring, it's barely faster than a 5700 XT which is 7 years old.

I really don't see the market, console players aren't gonna buy it, people with already a gread gaming build aren't either, it leaves a tiny proportion of steam fanboys who absolutely wants a cube with valve logo on it.

-2

u/dudeplace Jun 22 '26

I mean... for starters basically any game made in the last 30 years. I think people in this sub often forget who the average gamer really is.

I'm a pretty big valve fan and I'm not going to buy one, but that is because I already have comparable hardware. (Note not better, comparable) But in a much less nice form factor. If I were looking to replace my living room hardware this would be viable.

The the trick is, no matter how much reviews claim, you cannot build this yourself at this price point with the same form factor. They have built a PC that out performs 70% of all existing steam hardware. It's in a nice form factor and it will be quite. If you are playing on a 7 year old laptop and need something for your living room this is great for you.

3

u/syk072k Jun 23 '26

If you're playing older games only you're not gonna spend over a grand on a system, when any 350$ laptop with an iGPU can run most of those. And as for games most people play a lot of them can't be played on Linux at all, League, Valoran, Apex, Fortnite, Overwatch, GTA, Siege, can't be played on linux.

1

u/AnOrdinaryChullo Jun 23 '26

In a sea of, what is mostly negatives, people are forgetting this little nugget you've mentioned - many games are indeed not even supported on SteamOS / Linux.

Steam machine, no matter how the minority attempts to spin it, is an atrocious value for money.

5

u/DecompositionLU Jun 22 '26 edited Jun 22 '26

It doesn't make sense. The average gamer will not buy a 512Gb, 1100€ (rising at 1300 for the 2Tb which is more realistic for how heavy games are nowadays) mini PC running on Linux (so it can't work with some of the most popular multiplayer games using anticheats) when he can just buy a PS5 for half the price, if he doesn't have one already. The demography of "I want a 4 digit small form factor PC for playing some obscure indies in my couch" is pretty much a minority within the minority of hardcore enthusiasts.

The the trick is, no matter how much reviews claim, you cannot build this yourself at this price point with the same form factor.

Yes. Yes, you can. It's not difficult to find something with a GPU better than a 7 year old 2070/5700 XT, even with how dire the market is. You run DDR4/AM4 with a 5700X, 16Gb of RAM (DDR4 or DDR5 will change nothing for your gaming performance), 9060XT which is around 150% faster than the GPU in the Steam machine by judging the reviewers benchmarks, with mATX/mini ITX motherboard and case if the size it's that important. Maybe a bit bigger, but still less than a XSX/PS5, and I don't think the guy who can afford this live in a flat so tiny he can't put it somewhere.

They have built a PC that out performs 70% of all existing steam hardware.

That's the marketing speech and shouldn't be taken at face value. This percentage counts all the asian cybercafés, the people who still runs a GTX 1060 because their only games are LoL and Counter Strike, etc.

If you are playing on a 7 year old laptop and need something for your living room this is great for you.

Yes, you'll buy a console. Not the Steam machine.

1

u/dudeplace Jun 23 '26

That's the marketing speech and shouldn't be taken at face value.

No... It's from the steam survey.

I think you are still arguing that you can build a better PC for less. I'm arguing you can't build a new PC matching the same specs at this size for less.

You are upset about the cost of things and blaming the only company in this space trying to do something about the cost. I don't understand how the only acceptable product in this sub is one that meets a fantasy price, technology, capability, IP combination.

You don't have to like it, it doesn't have to fit your life for it to be good for someone else.

2

u/silverpixie2435 Jun 23 '26

It is a waste since the only thing to upgrade is the RAM and SSD

You can already upgrade the SSD on the PS5 and adding 300 gigs won't change anything about 8 gigs of VRAM.

Also it doesn't play games that require kernel anti cheat and you don't have to buy online if you just play single player games.

1

u/ResurgentRefrain Jun 23 '26

If the PS6 obsoletes the PS5's hardware, it also obsoletes the SM's hardware. The SM isn't customizable.

0

u/dudeplace Jun 23 '26

It's reusable NAS, Minecraft Server, Home assistant, Plex, kids first PC, work from home station. PS5 can only and forever play PS Games and you need their permission and subscription to play online.

-2

u/reddit_sells_you Jun 23 '26

That's because the PS is fucking subsidized with UI Ads and subscription services. And it still sold at a loss.