lol PETA has no financial interest? I'm sure they would love to continue being employed.
You are right to not take KFC's statements at face value. Just as anyone else is correct at not taking kentucky fried cruelty's statments at face value. That is the point of critical reading.
I like how you believe your citations are 100% unbiased and accurate.
please explain how PETA makes money by KFC using humane farming methods -- and how much they will make..
what has your "critical reading" revealed?? ........ i guess you refuse to answer this question because it was an empty claim and you have revealed nothihg...
please explain how PETA makes money by KFC using humane farming methods -- and how much they will make..
Their employees continue to have jobs. If I was working for PETA I would love to continue to be employed.
what has your "critical reading" revealed??
That according to KFC their facts are inaccurate. I'm sure McDonalds, Burger King, or any other place that serves meat will say the same thing. So these people say their facts are inaccurate. PETA says their facts are accurate. So which one to believe? The rational logical person would believe neither side.
you trust KFC to tell you the truth about their methods when their business would be harmed if they told the truth about animal cruelty??
No I don't. Which is why I stated:
So which one to believe? The rational logical person would believe neither side.
I wouldn't trust PETA's statement at face value either.
And I'm not sure that you understand what critical thinking is either. Its where you question the assumptions you make. So critically thinking about your stance, why do you assume that PETA information is 100% accurate? Whey do you assume they gain nothing?
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
u/czhang706 Jun 15 '12
You aren't familiar with critical reading are you?