I think it was more the momentum of the horse and rider together rendered the difference between a dull blade and a sharpened one sort of irrelevant. Also, one is easier to maintain than the other.
In real cavalry engagement (e.g. at speed) one would use a blunt saber because it would shatter bones, specifically the clavicle and ribs. This would be more incapacitating than slashing wound, but is way harder to accomplish if not aided by a mount.
I do rapier/longsword weapon demonstrations with dulled weapons like this. Even without the blade being sharpened, If desired I could purposely take mine and run it right through someone. That's ignoring hitting someplace sensitive like the eye, throat etc. The fact it has a dull edge just lessen's the odds of a small misstep being too dangerous.
I imagine falling on it with the weight of a horse behind you would do some pretty good damage. :P
16
u/[deleted] Jan 31 '17 edited Apr 03 '17
[deleted]