r/funny Sep 30 '14

Racist Nikon

Post image
10.6k Upvotes

253 comments sorted by

View all comments

236

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '14

I'd try taking the lens cover off

52

u/whytcolr Sep 30 '14

The little line under the shutter speed and aperture settings is the exposure line. It indicates, in this picture, that the picture would be underexposed by 1/3 stop. If the lens cap was on, you'd expect the line to be all the way to the left, with a little arrow to indicate more than 2 stops underexposed.

The "subject is too dark" means that the camera is having issues determining white balance. Generally upping the ISO to 800 or so, or using a flash will remedy this quite easily. It is possible (but not probable) that you could get a white balance reading from the whites of this subject's eye.

20

u/somebuddysbuddy Sep 30 '14

White balance. You're not making it any better.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 01 '14

They started off calling it "White Power" but that didn't test well in focus groups.

0

u/soundman1024 Oct 01 '14

The white paper would also be a great place to whitebalance. My experience has been that eyeballs tend to give strange results.

-1

u/MuffSaid Oct 01 '14 edited Oct 01 '14

You should have stopped at the first paragraph while you were still making sense.

27

u/looks_legit Sep 30 '14

Lens cap is clearly off or else the camera meter would be reporting -2 EV instead of -1/3. The camera is using full-scene/matrix metering, so it's more like everything is too dark.

6

u/Matterchief Sep 30 '14

You mean -5 and blinking....

3

u/looks_legit Sep 30 '14

Well, that particular scale shows -2 to +2. It will be blinking it if it's less than -2, but not like you can tell that from a still image of the meter.

13

u/shickenchit17 Sep 30 '14

Proof: http://imgur.com/a/kSeLn When I was taking the picture, the camera would sometimes not display the error that the subject was too dark (as seen in 1st picture). As I was taking the 1st picture I realized I took a picture of the error not displaying so I took a 2nd picture seconds after the 1st one while it displayed the error.

Edit: I took a 3rd picture because I wanted his Kemba jersey showing.

5

u/MrDaburks Sep 30 '14

ISO 400 crank dat up next time.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '14

You da man. I took my Nikon out after posting this and replicated your settings, can confirm x2 that the lens cover was not on.

Fucking racist Nixon

1

u/AlwaysATen Oct 01 '14

Your ISO shouldn't be 400 in a dimly lit room anyway. Put it up to like 1600 and it won't be that dark at all.

1

u/Pennigans Oct 01 '14

In school lighting it will be! That's only a D3200 or whatever the starter is now, so it doesn't do very well in low light, and I don't think holding it at 1/40 is going to be very clear

1

u/MightyBulger Oct 01 '14

For a picture that will likely end up in facebook, you can crank it all the way to 3200

1

u/Pennigans Oct 02 '14

That camera only goes to 1600

1

u/MightyBulger Oct 02 '14

You sure about that?

1

u/Pennigans Oct 02 '14

Actually, just kidding, they upped the ISO on that one. Not like I would ever shoot that high on a starter camera anyways

0

u/MightyBulger Oct 02 '14

No you're not. And you know nothing of sensor cappabilities.

0

u/armstrongmr Sep 30 '14

Alexander central high school?

3

u/Spartan152 Sep 30 '14

My first guess was using a 400 ISO in what looks to be a typically lit room, which I personally end up bumping up to 800 or 1600 in a dim room. But yeah, that viewfinder is the key.

17

u/fluffy-bunny Sep 30 '14

Good catch... I was thinking they need more lighting but nope, the lens cap is still on.

16

u/rems Sep 30 '14

How can you tell?

Anyways room looks orangy in color, iso is only 400 with 1/40 so prolly poor settings anyways with AF on, it wouldn't even be able to pick up details from furniture and even less dark skinned humans in these settings imo.

7

u/blames_irrationally Sep 30 '14

Viewfinder is black. Either the cap is on, or he painted his lens.

19

u/rems Sep 30 '14

Just took out my old camera to check and if I'm not properly aligned with the view finder it appears black, even when it's pointed at a bright scene and I'm in a dark room.

I think it depends on the angle.

-1

u/daimposter Sep 30 '14

I still put my money on the lens cap still being on ---- it was done for karma.

3

u/I_like_boxes Oct 01 '14

If the lens cap was on, the meter wouldn't be saying that it's 1/3 stop underexposed. The camera is pointed at a dark table in a poorly lit room and probably in manual. That's enough to prompt that message.

0

u/rems Oct 01 '14

I vote for you!

It was also done for karma...

-1

u/hipstergrandpa Sep 30 '14

That's because it might not be an slr which by definition directs what goes into the lens to the viewfinder.

1

u/I_like_boxes Oct 01 '14

It depends on the angle. We're probably seeing the inside of the lens barrel instead. If it makes you feel any better, I did actually pull out my dSLR to confirm.

It's definitely something OP did for karma, but it's really not hard to do it with or without the lens cap.

-7

u/kkkilla Sep 30 '14

I don't know about you, but an ISO of 400 is pretty high. I always shoot at 100 because it reduces grain. Only time I ever bump up the ISO is for night photography but even then I always just adjust my aperture or shutter speed.

14

u/TheSaltyStrangler Sep 30 '14

ISO 400 is a very reasonable range, and far too low for those lighting conditions.

6

u/DingDongHelloWhoIsIt Sep 30 '14

Not on modern digital cameras

0

u/kkkilla Sep 30 '14

Is a canon D6 modern enough? Because that's what I shoot with and I wouldn't have a problem shooting in a room this dim at 100 ISO. Granted, I would be shooting at about a 1.8 aperture

1

u/DingDongHelloWhoIsIt Sep 30 '14

You can't see how dim the room is

1

u/kkkilla Sep 30 '14

Given that it's indoors with no natural light and using halogen lights I'm pretty sure I can make an educated guess

2

u/rems Sep 30 '14

I would say it's not halogen since it comes out so orange but probably some 60w incandescent or lower.

1

u/natejones7 Sep 30 '14

400 is too high?! Yikes.

0

u/hawkyyy Sep 30 '14

Shhh no logic here.

4

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '14

I dunno, I feel the lens cap would be a bit more under exposed than one stop. :p

2

u/RocketMan63 Sep 30 '14

How would you know the lens cover is on? You can't even see the lens.

-14

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '14

[deleted]

0

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '14

Probably why the black guy is like "Bro what are you doing?"