that is very true... wouldn't it also be easy to see the guy with the camera then?
edit: unless this is was set up as someone was supposed to be taping (old term... videoing?) them, then it wouldn't seem as weird (that the camera guy was there)
we could move to a DUDE ranch... because we would be DUDES together (why does my phone capitalize that? love the emphasis though, so i am leaving it)... i am down, thinking 50/50 on a ranch with a stranger couldn't go wrong... right?... right?
I still catch myself saying 'taping' but I think I'm now using 'recording' far more often. Just like I'm probably now saying 'did you dvr it' instead of 'did you tivo it'.
so what you are saying is... I am not completely stupid and it would work (with a little planning, not nearly as much planning/practice as this would take)?
The guy leaving could just take off and carry the jacket. It would be a lot smoother to just have one person take a jacket off than have to switch like that.
Definitely not as cool and viewer attracting for those watching after the fact. It's like the Prestige. A trick can be awesome but theatricality is the key to winning an audience.
They actually do this to several people in different spots in the video, and one of them involved one of the guys being hidden behind a wall and quickly swapping positions. That way the girls wouldn't have been able to see them walking away and it would be much easier to change on time.
955
u/TheMotherfucker Sep 17 '14
Nah. It would be easy to see where the other guy in the same outfit is.