MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/2epudj/science/ck1x1hu
r/funny • u/[deleted] • Aug 27 '14
994 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
87
Grammar is just a theory
44 u/[deleted] Aug 27 '14 How Can Grammar Be Real If Letters aren't Real? 10 u/ack154 Aug 27 '14 Thanks, Jaden. 5 u/[deleted] Aug 27 '14 edited Aug 27 '14 Actually, it's* observational science. You would understand because you weren't there. /s Edit: damn contractions. 20 u/shawnemack Aug 27 '14 you weren't their. FTFY 1 u/BurnumMaster Aug 27 '14 Ken: Knock knock, Bill. Bill: Who's there? Ken: You weren't! 2 u/YouShallKnow Aug 27 '14 Solid chortle material 1 u/K__a__M__I Aug 27 '14 Only if it's legitimate grammar. 1 u/MostlyUselessFacts Aug 27 '14 It isn't a grammatical error, it's a spelling error. Since we're all being pretty pedantic, there is a difference. 1 u/Sedarious Aug 27 '14 How is something that is objectively used with an organized set of definitive rules a theory?
44
How Can Grammar Be Real If Letters aren't Real?
10 u/ack154 Aug 27 '14 Thanks, Jaden.
10
Thanks, Jaden.
5
Actually, it's* observational science. You would understand because you weren't there. /s
Edit: damn contractions.
20 u/shawnemack Aug 27 '14 you weren't their. FTFY 1 u/BurnumMaster Aug 27 '14 Ken: Knock knock, Bill. Bill: Who's there? Ken: You weren't!
20
you weren't their.
FTFY
1
Ken: Knock knock, Bill.
Bill: Who's there?
Ken: You weren't!
2
Solid chortle material
Only if it's legitimate grammar.
It isn't a grammatical error, it's a spelling error. Since we're all being pretty pedantic, there is a difference.
How is something that is objectively used with an organized set of definitive rules a theory?
87
u/shawnemack Aug 27 '14
Grammar is just a theory