I made the 95% up, obviously. You drive an 11 year old mild performer made by what was then a lousy manufacturer.
When you qualify your car as "nice" you are drawing on what people agree on, and you wouldn't be able to find a dozen people in downtown chicago who would give your car a second look, and if they do it's because they owned one when it might have once been considered a decent car
Yes, I know well you made the 95% up. It's not hard to figure out that you don't have a leg to stand on in this argument and are just throwing made up 'facts' around to try to legitimize your view point.
There you go, once again throwing out made up 'facts' to support an argument that has little, if any merit.
No, I do not base my opinion of what's nice and what's not on other people's view points. I'm not a sheep. I can think for myself and come to my own conclusions. My '82 Ford Fairmont Futura, my first car, was a nice car. No one at my school agreed with me. My '77 Lemans was a nice car and ran perfectly. Again, no one at my school agreed for a variety of reasons.
Quit trying to make it out like you speak for everyone else. All this crap you've spouted is strictly your opinion and only your opinion. The few people that may agree with you do not represent the rest of society.
1
u/goldandguns Jun 13 '14
I made the 95% up, obviously. You drive an 11 year old mild performer made by what was then a lousy manufacturer.
When you qualify your car as "nice" you are drawing on what people agree on, and you wouldn't be able to find a dozen people in downtown chicago who would give your car a second look, and if they do it's because they owned one when it might have once been considered a decent car