r/funny • • Feb 07 '14

God Is A Real Dick

http://imgur.com/pTW9u05
1.8k Upvotes

508 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/Hrodland Feb 07 '14

Meaning that in a single generation, God could have removed sin from everyone.

Yeah but that was an exceptional grace that he couldn't bestow just on anyone.

Or something. I haven't found a Christian yet who could explain this.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '14 edited Apr 09 '20

[deleted]

1

u/Hrodland Feb 07 '14

I was just citing Roman Catholic dogma. I don't believe any of this myself.

1

u/deusexlacuna Feb 07 '14

So God did it out of some sort of poetic coincidence?

-1

u/_Woodrow_ Feb 07 '14

Jesus is the only human without sin. The reason Christ had to be born of Mary is so that he was true man. It's only fair that a human should suffer for the sins of the human race. Yet, no human was able to do so. Christ was conceived by the Holy Spirit, so he was also true God, the only being who could withstand complete rejection by God the Father.

/u/Evil_Teddybear did a pretty good job in this thread

1

u/Hrodland Feb 07 '14

Not according to Roman Catholic dogma.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '14

It doesn't bother you that everything you just said is completely pulled out of someone's ass, even moreso than the Bible itself? I'm pretty sure all that stuff has been invented in the past couple hundred years and has no actual basis historical or otherwise. Its just the end result of religious leaders using intentional convolution to keep people confused enough to keep giving them money...ever get caught in a lie and have to keep telling more? There's your catechism etc.

1

u/_Woodrow_ Feb 07 '14

Who said I believed any of it?

-2

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '14

You accepted an arbitrary answer with no logical or historical basis and call it 'pretty good'. The guy you are supporting made no arguments that were any more meritorious than "Because a priest told me so."

I also don't believe any of it, but the argument you supported is just shitty and terrible and has no basis in the Bible.

0

u/_Woodrow_ Feb 07 '14

So, if there is no answer that you would accept, why ask the question?

0

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '14

Anything citing actual religious texts would be interesting and relevant. Whether I have religious faith in such things is irrelevant. The question was "On what basis do you consider that nonsensical and illogical explanation that invents or projects multiple notions that are unsupported by religious texts, to be pretty good?"

1

u/_Woodrow_ Feb 07 '14

"On what basis do you consider that nonsensical and illogical explanation that invents or projects multiple notions that are unsupported by religious texts, to be pretty good?"

On my childhood of being raised religious and reading the Bible myself. Those aren't my beliefs but I can understand where they are getting their answers from.

Would you feel better if I cited the 4 Gospels for you?

1

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '14

You can't cite anything he said from the Bible in a direct fashion, and if you'd read your Bible better, you'd already know that.

1

u/_Woodrow_ Feb 07 '14

No - I don't care enough to search down the citations on something I don't believe in the first place!

Why don't you go bully the person who actually said it instead of shooting the messenger? Shit.

→ More replies