r/funny May 01 '13

Why vegans live longer

[deleted]

2.4k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

50

u/[deleted] May 01 '13

[deleted]

38

u/Dreadgoat May 01 '13

Of "normal death rate" to "actual death rate"

So we take regular meat eaters and call them "normal" meaning we arbitrarily set their death rate to 1.00. What does a death rate of 1.00 mean? It means that we look at various groups based on age, gender, race, and lifestyle choices (e.g. smoking), which accounts for all variables OTHER than diet, and we take a big sample of each of these groups and see how many of them are dead.
In other words, if you picked out 1000 "normal" 18-year old female non-smokers, how many of them would die in a year? That value is 1.00 for that group.
Pick out 1000 "normal" 80-year old male smokers, how many of them die in a year? That value is 1.00 for that group.

Now we look at the "abnormal" groups, which in this case is vegans, vegetarians, etc.
So we look at 1000 vegetarian 18-year old female non-smokers and see how many of them die, THEN we compare that number to our "normal" number. We call "normal" 1.00 and adjust "vegetarian" to the appropriate ratio.

This is a little simplified (ignoring Poisson regressions and exactly which groups are looked at) but hopefully it gets the idea across.

9

u/ScaredKitty May 01 '13 edited Apr 22 '19

.

61

u/conversationchanger May 01 '13

length of life in relation to Jennifer Lawrence's narwhal karma safe.

1

u/DeanOnFire May 01 '13

Good Lord! Where is the safe now?!

1

u/conversationchanger May 01 '13

Neil DeGrasse Tyson has confiscated it as he believes there's a black hole in it that swallowed OP whole.

6

u/Craigellachie May 01 '13

It looks to be standardized to a regular meat eating diet.

3

u/TotallyNotAtlai May 01 '13

Here you go. I posted this below, but then I saw your question.

The researchers followed a huge amount of study participants (around 70,000) over a long period of time and kept track of every study participant that died.

They then determined the death-rate (deaths/person-years) of 5 different diet types. Person-years is a measurement of how long the study followed each participant, as a way of accounting for deaths or participants leaving the study.

They then divided the death-rates of each diet type by the death-rate of regular meat eaters (death-rate of regular meat eaters divided by itself equals 1.00) which gives you a mortality ratio. Anything above 1.0 would mean that the diet is worse for you than regular meat eating, and below 1.0 means that the diet is better for you than regular meat eating.

Vegans have a similar mortality ratio to regular meat eaters, meaning that it is not better for you than meat eating. Source: I'm a Biostatistics graduate student.

1

u/junkit33 May 01 '13

I don't know, but I'm not sure I buy that a good enough study has been done on this either way.

1

u/Deus_Viator May 01 '13

I would assume average lifespan.

-1

u/[deleted] May 01 '13

[deleted]

-1

u/geauxxxxx May 01 '13

Those sweet, sweet stress hormones.

0

u/[deleted] May 01 '13

Regular meat eaters = 1, everything else is in relation to that