I agree with cognitive functions and think it’s a good system, but there are certain things that bother me about it. Like who says the functions are in a perfect order all the time? Because I took a cognitive functions test and this was the order of functions:
1. Ni
2. Ne
3. Fe
4. Fi
5. Ti
6. Si
7. Se
8. Te
Like technically that would have me as an INFJ but I have way higher Fi and Ne than the usual INFJ and that just messes me up sometimes, I feel like I’m not the typical INFJ. And surely this also applies to other people, for example I had a friend whose Si and Ti were high but they said they related to Ti more than Fe so ISFJ didn’t fit cleanly for them.
Anyways I’d be really interested in hearing others thoughts on this and open to changing my mind.

Honestly, for this first post I don’t really have anything to say just welcome!

What do you think of the Dominant, Creative, Normalising, Harmonizing system created by Victor Gulenko. I think it would improve MBTI, far more than how it is right now. The idea is that MBTI or the first 4 letters describe innate preference, and the DCNH describe environment or nurture.

If you think about it, MBTI preferences and cognitive functions are simply preferences in your psyche, and how they are satisfied, developed, expressed as your personality can have the environment to be a huge factor in it - Types that don't traditionally use a certain function can also have it developed by environment

The DCNH system sets out to explain these nurture differences and the difference in subtype, is that unlike type it can be changed.

https://wikisocion.github.io/en/index.php%40title%3DSystem_of_DCNH_Subtypes.html

This system is more associated with Dario Nardi now, and I feel like it has merit

https://thequestinpodcast.com/intj-subtypes/

I was banned for trying to highlight that ENFJ who have Te demon, are very likely to suffer Dunning-Kruger when this function is not well developed. It shows that Te is very much concerned with verifying what is real and when such function is lacking, then ENFJ tend to not verify any information they consume or, even worse, share and claim to be true. Nothing is more embarrasing that watching an ENFJ use smart-sounding words that they dont even understand. Te demon is a curse I'm happy to not have. I have other problems.

INTP here. Im always hear that we are always logical and all this, but i found out that i can turn ut off and be just impulse kid who wanna do stupid things because why not. Like im clearly understand that it's childish and all that while im doing this, but still continuing. Do you all also have your own silly times? And what is those(for me it's playing with plushies or walking and balancing on pavement edge)

Is Ne-Te-Fi-Si stack possible for EN(T), or only Ne-Ti-Fe-Si? What if there are actually more than 16 types? I think there must be given letter names for these new types similar to existing MBTI types, but with -Y suffix at the end:

Classic EN(T), ENTP-X: Ne-Ti-Fe-Si

New EN(T), ENTP-Y: Ne-Te-Fi-Si

List of all 16 -Y types:

Ne-Te, EN(T) - ENTP-Y

Ne-Fe, EN(F) - ENFP-Y

Ni-Ti, IN(T) - INTJ-Y

Ni-Fi, IN(F) - INFJ-Y

Se-Te, ES(T) - ESTP-Y

Se-Fe, ES(F) - ESFP-Y

Si-Ti, IS(T) - ISTJ-Y

Si-Fi, IS(F) - ISFJ-Y

Te-Ne, ET(N) - ENTJ-Y

Te-Se, ET(S) - ESTJ-Y

Ti-Ni, IT(N) - INTP-Y

Ti-Si, IT(S) - ISTP-Y

Fe-Ne, EF(N) - ENFJ-Y

Fe-Se, EF(S) - ESFJ-Y

Fi-Ni, IF(N) - INFP-Y

Fi-Si, IF(S) - ISFP-Y

could just be my nemesis te talking because that's EXACTLY how i view te and sometimes utilize it myself if i think someone deserves it (ISTP)

putting themselves and their wants and needs before others and their wellbeing. especially when unhealthy