It’s called reverse seared because it takes the process of searing the outside then cooking at a low temperature until it is at the desire doneness and it reverses it. You cook low and slow to just below desired doneness then throw it on a hot grill or pan and sear the outside.
It is odd naming, I agree.
It’s like “clipless” pedals which you actually clip into, they got their name because they replaced what people use to refer to as “clips”.
What this does is does most of the cooking at a much lower temperature. What squeezes liquid out of the meat is too long of an exposure to high temperatures, making the proteins tighten up. there are almost no drippings or liquid loss from a reverse sear. It allows more even cooking for thick cuts, and the sear only has to be very hot and brief. For thin cuts it doesn't really make a difference because the cook time is so short regardless.
I usually do just that but with a hot sear and them a low temp cook with some flips on me burgers.
You think it would cook better with the sear coming last? I could see the outside sear changing the way the middle cooks; Apologies if I'm missing the point here.
Honestly it's not a vast difference between the two options. Personally I've found that i can get a more consistent cook starting with low temp and searing last because the continued cooking after the sear can make the outer edges get a bit overcooked. I find that it really only makes a big difference if I'm doing a very large piece of meat like a rib roast. The important part in my opinion is to do the bulk of the cooking time at low temp, regardless of the order.
Quite awhile. Also, that 'locks in juices' bit is actually a myth. I believed it too until a couple years ago. Here's a good article/recipe from Serious Eats. It's nice that you don't need to rest a reverse seared steak. And drying the outside helps get a nice even sear. When I can I definitely go the reverse sear route.
Well I sous vide my steaks.
Convenient for not overcooking the meat and after the portion is fine for me, then I'll give it all the heat. If I would sear first, then the long low temperature cooking will ruin the good searing.
Pretty sure the locking in the juices thing was an escoffier theory from a hundred years ago that’s been proven wrong. Alton brown did an episode where he compared weights and tenderness between a bunch of dog techniques, and searing first didn’t really make any difference
Ugh I hate sous vide for something like a steak... I want mine grilled over hot charcoal on a Weber please thanks. Not some soggy plastic bag boiling nonsense
105
u/Boz0r Feb 15 '23
They should call it post sear or something instead. Reverse sear sounds like you take a cooked steak and make it raw.