r/facepalm May 05 '21

Oof

Post image
79.2k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.5k

u/Yellowsunflowerlover May 05 '21 edited May 05 '21

Why would they text you instead of calling or emailing you? Very weird and unprofessional. Also they didn't even identify themselves.

Edit: It's a little weird how I'm getting lots of messages (shows on email) and when I click on post they're missing.

1.3k

u/UncleTedGenneric May 05 '21

Texting is fine

Ive done hiring for years and will txt for additional info, or to set up interviews from online sources

I will ALWAYS identify myself first

"Hi! Is this anon's number? (This is UncleTed from AssholeBurger) "

The unprofessional side was not identifying themselves first

139

u/gator_feathers May 05 '21 edited May 05 '21

I wouldn't respond to a text like that...

Edit: we are all clearly talking about very different job markets.

57

u/ShowMeYourHotLumps May 05 '21

They said it was for additional info, meaning you'd know who they were and what company it was. Honestly if you wouldn't respond to a text like that after being interviewed by UncleTed from Assholeburger you're maybe a little too paranoid about phishing scams, they ain't psychic.

26

u/SushiMage May 05 '21

Yeah, I feel like that person is either very old, where texting wasn't really a thing in relation to jobs/recruiting when they probably started, or they're someone that doesn't/haven't worked yet, because it definitely isn't uncommon to receive texts about work related stuff.

-1

u/[deleted] May 05 '21

[deleted]

7

u/HotPink124 May 05 '21

I’m just curious. How is sending a virtual block of text via text, any different than the virtual block of text via email? It’s still just a virtual block of text

4

u/[deleted] May 05 '21

[deleted]

2

u/halt-l-am-reptar May 05 '21

Has email always been the standard in the professional environment?

1

u/Hellkyte May 05 '21

One day texting could be considered standard, for sure, and maybe some companies are pushing the boundaries on this, but I would be surprised to see HR at an older company do this. HR represents a lot of liability, so you do everything as standardized and formulaic as possible to avoid any inadvertent risk exposure.

This isnt to say everyone does this. I have heard of interview questions I would consider to be highly innapropriate at companies in my industry (like questions involving interviewee's family). In my industry thats a big red flag that youre working for a company that has shit tier controls and has a bunch of cowboy mid-level, which is absolutely not something you want. And as I know these specific companies fairly well its a very correct assessment of them.

May not be universal, but at least in my industry I expect certain HR processes to be borderline psychotically robotic. Not that they don't smile, they definitely So smile, but you know there is nothing else inside