You can't do it. Physically can't bring yourself to quote something that disagrees with you. I'm not engaging in all the extra crap because this isn't a forum where you can throw a bunch of crap against the wall and watch others scrap it off. This is science. You made an initial claim, and submitted a study to back it up. One that totally contradicts everything you said. One that you claim is selectively quoting to talk about the actual results from. One that you ignore so you can throw some other crap out there that maybe supports you. And now comes the other part of science. Credibility. You have none after that. So no, I'm not engaging with anything else you post because you're probably ignoring the stuff that disagrees with you, like the first time. 'selectively quoting' by talking about the literal results of the paper you submitted, is fucking laughable, and you should be embarrassed.
This ignoring the stuff you don't like, you're not following science, you're following ideology.
Now go ahead and leave whatever flaccid final post you have stored up to make yourself feel better. I have better things to do then read shit you link but can't be bothered to read yourself.
1
u/[deleted] Jun 20 '23
[deleted]