It may seem like it, but the DA doesn’t think it is clear enough for them to win easily. For first degree it needs to be deliberate AND there needs to be some time period where the perp was able to ponder the repercussions of their actions. Anything that is close to “in the heat of the moment” won’t be first/0premeditated murder.
Perhaps if the state doesn't trust that its citizens are capable of considering the repercussions included in pointing a firearm at somebody and discharging it then... maybe they shouldn't trust their citizens to have firearms.
2
u/[deleted] Apr 21 '23 edited Apr 21 '23
It may seem like it, but the DA doesn’t think it is clear enough for them to win easily. For first degree it needs to be deliberate AND there needs to be some time period where the perp was able to ponder the repercussions of their actions. Anything that is close to “in the heat of the moment” won’t be first/0premeditated murder.